Skip to main content
Log in

Displaced distal radius fractures

A comparative study of early results following external fixation, functional bracing in supination, or dorsal plaster immobilization

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A comparison of the radiographical and functional results after displaced distal radius fractures in 41 patients treated by external fixation (EF), 36 patients treated by functional bracing in supination (FUSU), and 49 patients treated by dorsal plaster immobilization (DPI) was performed. The rate of initial complications after EF was 53%, compared with 22% after FUSU and 14% after DPI. The radiographical result after EF was significantly better than after nonoperative treatment, but the functional result after 3 and 6 months demonstrated no significant difference between the three series. Consequently, EF and FUSU do not restore wrist function faster than conventional plaster treatment (DPI), but EF improves the radiographical result, though the rate of complications is higher.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bünger C, Sølund K, Rasmussen P (1984) Early results after Colles fracture: functional bracing in supination versus dorsal plaster immobilization. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 103:251–256

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cooney WP (1983) External fixation of distal radius fractures. Clin Orthop 180:45–49

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cooney WP, Dobyns JH, Lindscheid RL (1980) Complications of Colles fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 62-A: 613–619

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bruijn HP de (1987) Functional treatment of Colles fracture. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 223

  5. Forgon M, Mammel E (1981) The external fixateur in the management of unstable colles fracture. Int Orthop 5:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  6. Foster DE, Kopta JA (1986) Up-date on external fixateurs in the treatment of wrist fractures. Clin Orthop 204: 177–183

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frykman G (1967) Fractures of the distal radius including sequelae — shoulder-hand-finger syndrome, disturbances in the distal radius ulnar joint and impairment of nerve function. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 108

  8. Gartland JJ, Werley CW (1951) Evaluation of healed Colles fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 33-A: 895–907

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grana WA, Kopta JA (1979) The Roger Andersson device in the treatment of fractures of the distal end of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg 61-A: 1234–1238

    Google Scholar 

  10. Green DP (1975) Pins and plaster treatment of comminuted fractures of the distal end of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg 57A:304–310

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jenkins NH, Jones DG, Johnson SR, Mintowt-Czyz WJ (1987) External fixation of Colles fractures — an anatomical study. J Bone Joint Surg 69-B: 207–211

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kongsholm J (1987) Colles fractures — a clinical experimental and anatomical study. Acta Univ Upsal 74

  13. Kreiner S (1987) Analysis of multidimensional contingency tables by exact conditional tests: technics and strategies. Scand J Stat 14:97–112

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lidström A (1959) Fractures of the distal end of the radius. A clinical and statistical study of end-results. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 41

  15. McQueen MM, Maclaren A, Chalmers J (1986) The value of re-manipulating Colles fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 68-B: 232233

    Google Scholar 

  16. Older TL, Stabler EW, Cassebaum WH (1965) Colles fracture: evaluation and selection of therapy. J Trauma 5:469–476

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sarmiento A, Pratt GB, Berry NC, Sinclair WF (1975) Colles fractures — functional bracing in supination. J Bone Joint Surg 57-A: 311–317

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sølund K, Rasmussen P, Borg L, Bünger C (1983) Radiological functional and social healing after Colles fracture. A prospective investigation. Ugeskr Læg 145:2289–2292

    Google Scholar 

  19. Solgaard S (1985) Classification of distal radius fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 56:249–252

    Google Scholar 

  20. Solgaard S (1988) Late functional results after distal radius fracture. Acta Orthop Scand 59:39–42

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stewart HD, Innes AR, Burke FD (1984) Functional cast bracing for Colles fractures — a comparison between cast bracing and conventional plaster cast. J Bone Joint Surg 66-B: 749–753

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vaughan PA, Spenser ML, Harrington IJ, Maistrelli GL (1985) Treatment of unstable fractures of the distal radius by external fixation. J Bone Joint Surg 67-B:385–389

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wermuth N, Lauritzen SL (1983) Graphical and recursive models for contingency tables. Biometrika 70:537–552

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solgaard, S., Bünger, C. & Sølund, K. Displaced distal radius fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 109, 34–38 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00441907

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00441907

Keywords

Navigation