Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence of objective eye manifestations in people working in office buildings with different prevalences of the sick building syndrome compared with the general population

  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A cross-sectional clinical epidemiological study was carried out among 169 office workers in four Copenhagen town halls with different prevalences of the sick building syndrome. The results were compared with those in 112 subjects randomly selected from the general population. Biomicroscopic eye manifestations, such as premature break-up of the precorneal tear film, absence of foam at the inner eye canthus and epithelial damage of the bulbar conjunctiva, were investigated together with self-reported eye complaints. Although intercorrelated, the objective eye manifestations independently were statistically associated with self-reported eye complaints in office workers. The prevalence of the objective eye manifestations was significantly elevated in office workers compared with the general population and most pronounced for the buildings with a high prevalence of the sick building syndrome (P < 0.001). In the general population, subjects with a non-industrial occupation, including office workers, had a significantly higher prevalence of objective eye manifestations than those with an industrial occupation (P = 0.03), but the prevalence was still significantly lower than that among the office workers in buildings with a high prevalence of the sick building syndrome (P<0.001). Since possible confounders were found not to explain the difference in prevalence of objective eye manifestations and complaints among the two populations, it is concluded that the office environment (buildings and/or type of office work) promotes these objective changes accompanied by self-reported complaints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berglund B, Lindvall T (1986) Sensory reactions to “sick buildings”. Environ Int 12:147–159

    Google Scholar 

  2. Editorials (1991) Sick building syndrome. Lancet 338:1493–1494

  3. Finnegan MJ, Pickering CAC, Burge PS (1984) The sick building syndrome: prevalence studies. Br Med J 289:1573–1575

    Google Scholar 

  4. Franck C (1986) Eye symptoms and signs in buildings with indoor climate problems (‘office eye syndrome’). Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 64:306–311

    Google Scholar 

  5. Franck C (1991) Fatty layer of the precorneal film in the ‘office eye syndrome’. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 69:114–120

    Google Scholar 

  6. Franck C, Skov P (1989) Foam at inner eye canthus in office workers, compared with an average Dansih population as control group. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 67:61–68

    Google Scholar 

  7. Franck C, Skov P (1991) Evaluation of two different questionnaires used for diagnosing ocular manifestations in the sick building syndrome on the basis of an objective index. Indoor Air 1:5–11

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hedge A, Burge PS, Robertson AS, Wilson S, Harris-Bass J (1989) Work related illness in offices: a proposed model of the sick building syndrome. Environ Int 15:143–158

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hodgson MJ, Frohliger J, Permar E, et al. (1991) Symptoms and microenvironmental measures in nonproblem buildings. Occup Med 33:527–533

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mendell MJ, Smith AH (1990) Consistent pattern of elevated symptoms in air-conditioned office buildings: a reanalysis of epidemiologic studies. Am J Public Health 80:1193–1199

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nordbäck D, Torgén M, Edling C (1990) Volatile organic compounds, respirable dust, and personal factors related to prevalence and incidence of sick building syndrome in primary schools. Br Ind Med 47:733–741

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nordbäck D, Edling C (1991) Environmental, occupational, and personal factors related to the prevalence of sick building syndrome in the general population. Br J Ind Med 48:451–462

    Google Scholar 

  13. Norn M (1983) External eye, methods of examination. Scriptor 80, Copenhagen

  14. Norn M (1987) Foam in the external part of the eye. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 65:143–146

    Google Scholar 

  15. Skov P, Valbjørn O (1987) The “sick” building syndrome in the office environment: the danish town hall study. Environ Intl 3:339–349

    Google Scholar 

  16. Skov P, Valbjørn O, Pedersen BV (1989) Influence of personal characteristics, job related factors and psychosocial factors on the sick building syndrome. Scand J Work Environ Health 15:286–295

    Google Scholar 

  17. Skov P, Valbjørn O, Pedersen BV (1990) Influence of indoor climate on the sick building syndrome in an office environment. Scand J Work Environ Health 16:363–371

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franck, C., Bach, E. & Skov, P. Prevalence of objective eye manifestations in people working in office buildings with different prevalences of the sick building syndrome compared with the general population. Int. Arch Occup Environ Heath 65, 65–69 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00586061

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00586061

Key words

Navigation