Skip to main content
Log in

Accuracy of phonotaxis by the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea)

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Phonotactic approaches (N=156) of 42 female green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) were videotaped over a distance of 3.75 m in response to synthetic mating calls (0.9 kHz and 0.9, 2.7 and 3.0 kHz).

  2. 2.

    To quantify the accuracy of phonotaxis, jump anglesγ and head orientation angles α were measured (Fig. 2) when the animals were 1 m or farther from the sound source.

  3. 3.

    Phonotaxis was extremely accurate in response to the 3-component call, which is behaviorally equivalent to the male's natural mating call. The mean jump angle was\(\bar \gamma = 16.1^\circ\) (Fig. 5). Head scanning occurred prior to about 25% of the jumps. The accuracy of head orientation after scanning was even greater\((\bar \alpha = 8.4^\circ )\) as were the subsequent jumps\((\bar \gamma = 11.8^\circ )\) (Fig. 6 and Table 1).

  4. 4.

    With respect to the two synthetic calls no statistically significant differences in jump accuracy were found (Table 1). Thus the high frequency components around 3 kHz, normally found in the mating call, do not enhance the accuracy of sound localization.

  5. 5.

    Our results are discussed in terms of models of sound localization in vertebrates and invertebrates, and we suggest that the treefrog's ear must act as a sound pressure gradient receiver.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Autrum, H.: Über Lautäußerungen und Schallwahrnehmung bei Arthropoden. II. Das Richtungshören vonLocusta und Versuch einer Hörtheorie für Tympanalorgane vom Locustidentyp. Z. Vergl. Physiol.28, 327–352 (1940)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beranek, L.L.: Acoustics. New York: McGraw-Hill 1954

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, S.G., Pettigrew, A., Anson, M.: Dynamics of the amphibian middle ear. Nature London272, 142–147 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Erulkar, S.D.: Comparative aspects of spatial localization of sound. Physiol. Rev.52, 237–360 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, A.S., Capranica, R.R.: Sound localization in anurans. I. Evidence of binaural interaction in dorsal medullary nucleus of bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana). J. Neurophysiol.39, 871–881 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, A.S., Capranica, R.R.: Sound localization in anurans. II. Binaural interaction in superior olivary nucleus of the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea). J. Neurophysiol.41, 43–54 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, A.S., Gerhardt, H.C., Capranica, R.R.: Sound localization behavior of the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) and the barking treefrog (H. gratiosa). J. Comp. Physiol.107, 241–252 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt, H.C.: The significance of some spectral features in mating call recognition in the green treefrog (Hyla cinera). J. Exp. Biol.61, 229–241 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D.R., Dunning, D.C., Cahlander, D.A., Webster, F.A.: Correlated orientation sounds and ear movements of horseshoe bats. Nature196, 1185–1186 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K.G., Boyan, G.S.: Sensitivity to frequency and direction of sound in the auditory system of crickets (Gryllidae). J. Comp. Physiol.121, 79–97 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Klumpp, R.G., Eady, H.R.: Some measurements of interaural time difference thresholds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.28, 859–860 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, E., Konishi, M.: Personal communication (in preparation) (1979)

  • Konishi, M.: Locatable and non-locatable acoustic signals for barn owls. Am. Nat.107, 775–785 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, O.N., Michelsen, A.: Biophysics of the ensiferan ear. III. The cricket ear as a four-input system. J. Comp. Physiol.123, 217–227 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.B.: The physiology of the tettigoniid ear. II. The response characteristics of the ear to differential inputs: Lesion and blocking experiments. J. Exp. Biol.60, 839–851 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen, A., Nocke, H.: Biophysical aspects of sound communication in insects. Adv. Insect Physiol.10, 247–296 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, A.W.: Auditory localization. In: Foundations of modern auditory theory, Vol. II. Tobias, J.V. (ed.), pp. 303–348. New York: Academic Press 1972

    Google Scholar 

  • Moushegian, G., Stillman, R.D., Rupert, A.L.: Characteristic delays in superior olive and inferior colliculus. In: Physiology of the auditory system. Sachs, M.B. (ed.), pp. 245–254. Baltimore, Maryland: National Educational Consultants 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphey, R.K., Zaretsky, M.D.: Orientation to calling song by female crickets,Scapsipedus marginatus (Gryllidae). J. Exp. Biol.56, 335–352 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, W.D.: Localization and lateralization of sound in space. In: Ciba Foundation Hearing Mechanisms in Vertebrates. Reuck, A.V.S. de, Knight, J. (eds.), pp. 207–233. London: Churchill 1968

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, R.S., Gerhardt, H.C.: Behavioral isolating mechanisms of the treefrogsHyla cinerea andH. gratiosa. Copeia2, 223–230 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, H.F.: Gradient microphones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.17, 192–193 (1943)

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, R.S.: Acoustic location of prey by barn owls (Tyto alba). J. Exp. Biol.56, 535–573 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pumphrey, R.J.: Hearing in insects. Biol. Rev.15, 107–132 (1940)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye, J.D., Flinn, M., Pye, A.: Correlated orientation sounds and ear movements of horseshoe bats. Nature196, 1186–1188 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye, J.D., Roberts, L.H.: Ear movements in a Hipposiderid bat. Nature225, 285–286 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzkopff, J.: Beitrag zum Problem des Richtungshörens bei Vögeln. Z. Vergl. Physiol.32, 319–327 (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, E.A.G.: The external ear. In: Handbook of sensory physiology V/1. Keidel, W.D., Neff, W.D.S. (eds.), pp. 455–490.Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, J.A., Vernon, J.A.: Echolocation: discrimination of targets by the batEptesicus fuscus. J. Exp. Zool.176, 315–328 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Strother, W.F.J.: The electrical response of the auditory mechanisms in the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.52, 157–162 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F.A.: Active energy radiating systems: the bat and ultrasonic principles. II. Acoustical control of airborne interceptions by bats. In: Proc. Intern. Congress Technol. Blind 1963

  • Zwislocki, J., Feldman, R.S.: Just noticeable differences in dichotic phase. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.28, 860–864 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

(BNS-7300795; NS-00217-02) and to R.R. Capranica (NS-09244). We especially appreciate the cooperation of the staff of the Savannah Science Museum for letting us use their facilities. We thank Richard Daniel, Steve A. Perrill and Sarah Hopkins for assistance and Mary Vella for typing the manuscript. A.J.M. Moffat and R.B. Coles critically read the manuscript and contributed excellent comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rheinlaender, J., Gerhardt, H.C., Yager, D.D. et al. Accuracy of phonotaxis by the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea). J. Comp. Physiol. 133, 247–255 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00661127

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00661127

Keywords

Navigation