Skip to main content
Log in

Primary liver cancer in Hong Kong

  • Session III: Poster Session
  • Liver Cancer, Etoposide, Epirubicin
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

From 1984 to 1987, we conducted a series of chemotherapy trials to assess their efficacy and impact on survival in patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma. A total of 18 patients were treated with etoposide at a dose of 200 mg/m2 given on days 1–3 every 3 weeks for a maximum of 8 courses. No response was observed in any of the 18 patients studied. A further trial using epirubicin at doses of 40 and 75 mg/m2 again showed no evidence of a tumor response in 14 consecutive patients. The dose of epirubicin was further escalated to 90 mg/m2. Of the 33 patients treated, 1 (3%) achieved a complete response and 2 (6%) showed a partial response. Although the overall median survival amounted to only 72 days, the survival of the three responders was 15, 13, and 12 months, respectively. Therefore, we believe that the tumor response to epirubicin may be dose-dependent. However, the toxicity was also dose-dependent. To improve the therapeutic index we are currently evaluating the impact of intrahepatic artcrial injection of a lipiodol-epirubicin emulsion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bonfante, V, Villani F, Bonadonna G (1982) Toxic and therapeutic activity of 4′-epi-doxorubicin. Tumori 68:105

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cancer Registry (1986) Medical and Health Department, Hong Kong Government

  3. Lee NW, Wong J, Ong GB (1982) The surgical management of primary carcinoma of the liver. World J Surg 6:66

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lee, YJ, Staquet M, Simon R, Catane R, Muggia F (1979) Two-stage plans for patient accrual in phase II cancer clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rep 63:1721

    Google Scholar 

  5. Melia WM, Johnson PJ, Williams R (1983) Induction of remission in hepatocellular carcinoma. A comparison of VP16 with Adriamycin. Cancer 51:206

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A (1981) Reporting results of cancer treatment Cancer 47:207

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ong GB, Chan PK (1976) Primary carcinoma of liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet 143:31

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson HH, Tompkins RK, Longmire WP Jr (1983) Major hepatic resection. A 25-year experience. Ann Surg 197:375

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tsuzuki T, Ogata Y, Iida S, Shimazu M (1984) Hepatic resection in 125 patients. Arch Surg 119:1025

    Google Scholar 

  10. Von Hoff DD, Layard, MW, Basa P, Davis HL Jr, Von Hoff AL, Rozencweig M, Muggia FM (1979) Risk factors for doxorubicin-induced congestive heart failure. Ann Intern Med 91:710

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shiu, W.C.T. Primary liver cancer in Hong Kong. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 31 (Suppl 1), S143–S145 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00687124

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00687124

Keywords

Navigation