Skip to main content
Log in

Standardized uptake values of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: the value of different normalization orocedures

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While the evident advantages of absolute metabolic rate determinations cannot be equalled by static image analysis of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic (FDG PET) studies, various algorithms for the normalization of static FDG uptake values have been proposed. This study was performed to compare different normalization procedures in terms of dependency on individual patient characteristics. Standardized FDG uptake values (SUVs) were calculated for liver and lung tissue in 126 patients studied with wholebody FDG PET. Uptake values were normalized for total body weight, lean body mass and body surface area. Ranges, means, medians, standard deviations and variation coefficients of these SUV parameters were calculated and their interdependency with total body weight, lean body mass, body surface area, patient height and blood sugar levels was calculated by means of regression analysis. Standardized FDG uptake values normalized for body surface area were clearly superior to SUV parameters normalized. for total body weight or lean body mass. Variation and correlation coefficients of body surface area-normalized uptake values were minimal when compared with SUV parameters derived from the other normalization procedures. Normalization for total body weight resulted in uptake values still dependent on body weight and blood sugar levels, while normalization for lean body mass did not eliminate the positive correlation with lean body mass and patient height. It is concluded that normalization of FDG uptake values for body surface area is less dependent on the individual patient characteristics than are FDG uptake values normalized for other parameters, and therefore appears to be preferable for FDG PET studies in oncology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. DiChiro G, Brooks RA. PET quantitation: blessing and curse [editorial].J Nucl Med 1988; 29: 1603–1605.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Strauss LG, Conti PS: The application of PET in clinical oncology.J Nucl Med 1991; 32: 623–648.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zasadny KR, Wahl RL. Standardized uptake values of normal tissues at PET with FDG: variations with body weight and a method for correction.Radiology 1993; 189: 847–850.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dahlbom M, Hoffman EJ, Hoh CK, Schiepers C, Rosenqvist G, Hawkins RA, Phelps ME. Whole-body PET: part I. Methods and performance characteristics.J Nucl Med 1992; 33: 1191–1199.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kim CK, Gupta NC, Chandramouli B, Alavi A. Standardized uptake values of FDG: body surface area correction is preferable to body weight correction.J Nucl Med 1994; 35: 164–167.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Griffeth LK, Dehdashti F, McGuire AH, Perry DJ, Moerlein SM, Siegal BA. PET evaluation of soft-tissue masses with FDG.Radiology 1992; 182: 185–194.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim CK, Gupta NC. Dependency of standardized uptake values of FDG on body “size”: body surface area correction versus lean body mass correction [abstract].J Nucl Med 1995; 36: 201P.

  8. Hübner KF, Buonocore E, Singh SK, Gould HR, Cotten DW. Characterization of chest masses by FDG PET.Clin Nucl Med 1995;20:293–298.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wong FCL, Garcia JR, Kim EE, Wong WH, Podoloff DA. Normal organ uptake of FDG and C-11 methionine during PET scans of oncologic patients [abstract].J Nucl Med 1994; 35: 220P.

  10. Leskinen-Kallio S, Minn H, Zasadny KR. Standardized uptake values of FDG [letter].J Nucl Med 1994; 35: 1564.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schomburg, A., Bender, H., Reichel, C. et al. Standardized uptake values of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: the value of different normalization orocedures. Eur J Nucl Med 23, 571–574 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00833394

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00833394

Key words

Navigation