Skip to main content
Log in

Large striatocapsular infarcts: Clinical features and risk factors

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We defined large striatocapsular infarcts as subcortical softenings of more than 20 mm in diameter involving the territories of the lateral and medial groups of lenticulostriate arteries. The aim of this study of 56 patients was to compare the clinical features and risk factors of these infarcts with those of cortical and lacunar infarcts. On the whole, our data suggest that both the clinical features and risk factors of large striatocapsular infarcts are similar to those of cortical infarcts, but significantly different from those of lacunar infarcts. The clinical manifestations of large striatocapsular infarcts with a maximum diameter of less than 50 mm may sometimes resemble those of lacunar infarcts because neuropsychological disorders are less frequent; however, our study indicates that, even in these cases, cardioembolic sources and artery-to-arteiy embolism are significantly more frequent in large striatocapsular than in lacunar infarcts, thus suggesting a different pathogenesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bamford J, Warlow CP (1988) Evolution and testing of the lacunar hypothesis. Stroke 19:1074–1082

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bisiach, Cappa S, Vallar G (1983) Guida all'esame neuropsicologico. Cortina, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bladin PF, Berkovic SF (1984) Striatocapsular infarction: large infarcts in the lenticulostriate arterial territory. Neurology 34:1423–1430

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bogousslavsky J (1992) The plurality of subcortical infarction. Stroke 23:629–631

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boiten J, Lodder J (1992) Large striatocapsular infarcts: clinical presentation and pathogenesis in comparison with lacunar and cortical infacts. Acta Neurol Scand 86:298–303

    Google Scholar 

  6. Caplan RL, Schmahmann JD, Kase CS, Feldmann E, Baquis G, Greenberg JP, Gorelick PB, Helgason C, Hier DB (1990) Caudate infarcts. Arch Neurol 47:133–143

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coté R, Battista RN, Wolfson C, Boucher J, Adams J, Hachinski V (1989) The Canadian Neurological Scale: validation and reliability assessment. Neurology 39: 638–643

    Google Scholar 

  8. Damasio H. (1983) A computed tomographic guide to the identification of cerebral vascular territories. Arch Neurol 40:138–142

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Renzi E, Faglioni P (1978) Normative data and screening power of a shortened version of the Token test. Cortex 14:41–49

    Google Scholar 

  10. Donnan GA, Bladin PF, Berkovic SF, Longley WA, Saling MM (1991) The stroke syndrome of striatocapsular infarction. Brain 114:51–70

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ferro JM, Kertesz A, Black SE (1987) Subcortical neglect: quantitation, anatomy, and recovery. Neurology 37: 1487–1492

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fisher CM (1969) The arterial lesions underlying lacunes. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 12:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fisher CM (1982) Lacunar strokes and infarcts: a review. Neurology 32:871–876

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fisher CM (1991) Lacunar infarcts: a review. Cerebrovasc Dis 1:311–320

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ghica JA, Bogousslavsky J, Regli F (1990) Deep perforators from the carotid system. Arch Neurol 47:1097–1100

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goodglass H, Kaplan E (1983) The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  17. Levine RL, Lagreze HL, Dobkin JA, Turski PA (1988) Large subcortical hemisphere infarctions. Presentation and prognosis. Arch Neurol 45:1074–1077

    Google Scholar 

  18. Morris JA, Altman DG (1988) Confidence interval rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. BMJ Med J 292:746–750

    Google Scholar 

  19. Oberg RGE, Divac I (1979), Cognitive functions' of the neostriatum. In: Divac I, Oberg RGE (eds) The neostriatum. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 291–313

    Google Scholar 

  20. Olsen TS, Bruhn P, Oberg RGE (1986) Cortical hypoperfusion as a possible cause of “subcortical aphasia”. Brain 109:393–410

    Google Scholar 

  21. Perani D, Vallar G, Cappa S, Messa C, Fazio F (1987) Aphasia and neglect after subcortical stroke. Brain 110:1211–1229

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sandercock P (1989) The odds ratio: a useful tool in neurosciences. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 52:817–820

    Google Scholar 

  23. Weiller C, Ringelstein EB, Reiche W, Thron A, Buell U (1990) The large striatocapsular infarcts: a clinical and pathophysiological entity. Arch Neurol 47:1085–1091

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weiller C, Willmes K, Reiche W, Thron A, Isensee C, Buell U, Ringelstein B (1993) The case of aphasia or neglect after striatocapsular infarction. Brain 116:1509–1525

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nicolai, A., Lazzarino, L.G. & Biasutti, E. Large striatocapsular infarcts: Clinical features and risk factors. J Neurol 243, 44–50 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00878530

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00878530

Key words

Navigation