Abstract
The present investigation evaluated the acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior. Clinical cases of children who displayed severe behavioral problems at home and at school were described along with three different treatments. The treatments, time-out from reinforcement, locked seclusion, and medication, were rated by psychiatric inpatient children and parents in a 3 × 3 replicated Latin-square design. The investigation also evaluated whether acceptability ratings were influenced by the clinical effectiveness of treatment in altering behavior. Although children and parents did not differ overall in acceptability ratings, they differed in their ranking of different treatments. Children viewed medication as the most acceptable treatment, whereas parents viewed time out as the most acceptable treatment. For both children and parents, treatments described as producing marked effects were rated as more acceptable than treatments producing weaker effects. The results indicated that disturbed children and their parents can readily distinguish the acceptability of alternative treatments. The implications of treatment acceptability for clinical applications of treatment are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (1980).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental Disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.
Brown, J. L., & Bing, S. R. (1976). Drugging children: Child abuse by professionals. In G. P. Koocher (Ed.),Children's rights and the mental health professions (pp. 219–228). New York: Wiley.
Budd, K. S., & Baer, D. M. (1976). Behavior modification and the law: Implications of recent judicial decisions.Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 4, 171–244.
Hollingshead, A. B., & Redlich, F. C. (1958).Social class and mental illness. New York: Wiley.
Kazdin, A. E. (1980a). Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 259–273.
Kazdin, A. E. (1980b). Acceptability of time out from reinforcement procedures for disruptive child behavior.Behavior Therapy, 11, 329–344.
Kazdin, A. E. (1980c).Behavior modification in applied settings (2nd ed.). Homewood, Illionis: Dorsey.
Kazdin, A. E. (1981). Acceptability of child treatment techniques: The influence of treatment efficacy and adverse side effects.Behavior Therapy, 12, 493–506.
Kazdin, A. E., French, N. H., & Sherick, R. B. (1981). Acceptability of alternative treatments for children: Evaluations by inpatient children, parents, and staff.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 900–907.
Koocher, G. P. (1976). Bill or rights for children in psychotherapy. In G. P. Koocher (Ed.),Children's rights and the mental health professions (pp. 23–32). New York: Wiley.
Maher, B. A. (1978). Stimulus sampling in clinical research: Representative design reviewed.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 643–647.
Martin, R. (1975).Legal challenges to behavior modification: Trends in schools, corrections and mental health. Champaign, Illinois: Research Press.
Mattson, M. R., & Sacks, M. H. (1978). Seclusion: Uses and complications.American Journal of Psychiatry, 135, 1210–1213.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957).Measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Rosenberg, C. M., & Raynes, A. E. (1976).Keeping patients in psychiatric treatment. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger.
Ross, A. E. (1980).Psychological disorders of children: A behavioral approach to theory, research and therapy (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schwab, P. J., & Lahmeyer, C. B. (1979). The uses of seclusion in a general hospital psychiatric unit.Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 40, 228–231.
Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights, Committee of the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-Third Congress. (1974).Individual rights and the federal role in behavior modification. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Werry, J. S. (Ed.) (1978).Pediatric psychopharmacology: The use of behavior modifying drugs in children. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Completion of this investigation was facilitated by a Research Scientist Development Award (MH00353) and a grant (MH35408) from the National Institute of Mental Health. The author is grateful for the assistance of the clinical research team of the Child Psychiatric Treatment Service, especially that of Irene Heidish, M.A., who assisted with the data analyses.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kazdin, A.E. Acceptability of aversive procedures and medication as treatment alternatives for deviant child behavior. J Abnorm Child Psychol 12, 289–301 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00910669
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00910669