Abstract
In response to the need to differentiate the effects of female and male violence, scales were developed applicable to female violence against men. Two versions of the Severity of Violence Against Men Scale (SVAMS) were devised as a counterpart to the Severity of Violence Against Women Scales (SVAWS). On 10-point rating scales, college males (N = 570) rated how serious, aggressive, abusive, violent, and threatening it would be if a woman did each of 46 acts to a man. The mean of each act across the ratings was calculated and then submitted to factor analysis. Eight factors emerged representing threats of mild, moderate, and serous violence, actual mild, minor, moderate, and serious violence and sexual violence. Community men (N = 115) rated the same acts on seriousness, aggressiveness, and abusiveness. All factors were unidimensional. Second order factor analysis confirmed that two dimensions (physical threats and actual violence) were represented. In contrast to the SVAWS, sexual violence loaded with threats of physical violence. The groups' ratings of physical and emotional harm provided the weightings for future research with student (SVAMS-S) and adult (SVAMS) samples.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arias, L, and Johnson, P. J. (1986).Evaluations of physical aggression in marriage, Paper presented at the 20th Annual Convention of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Chicago, IL.
Barling, J., O'Leary, K. D., Jouriles, E. N., Vivian, P., and MacEwen, K. E. (1987). Factor similarity of the conflict tactics scales across samples, spouses, and sites: Issues and implications.J. Fam. Viol. 2: 37–54.
Finkelhor, P., Hotaling, G. T., and Yllo, K. (1988).Stopping family violence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Gondolf, E. W. (1987). Evaluation programs for men who batter: Problems and prospects.J. Fam. Viol. 2: 95–108.
Hudson, W. W., and McIntosh, S. R. (1981). The assessment of spouse abuse: Two quantifiable dimensions.J. Marr. Fam. 43: 873–885.
Makepeace, J. M. (1986). Gender differences in courtship violence victimization.Fam. Relat. 35: 383–388.
Marshall, L. L. (1992). Development of the Severity of violence against women scales.J. Fam. Viol. 7: 103–121.
O'Leary, K. D., and Arias, I. (1988). Assessing agreement of reports of spouse abuse. In Hotaling, G. T., Finkelhor, A., Kirkpatrick, J. T., and Straus, M. A. (eds).Family Abuse and Its Consequences, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Pirog-Good, M. A., and Stets, J. E. (1989). The help-seeking behavior of physically and sexually abused college students. In Pirog-Good, M. A., and Stets, J. E. (eds.),Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues, Praeger, New York.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales.J. Man. Fam. 41: 75–86.
Sugarman, D. B., and Hotaling, G. T. (1989). Dating violence: Prevalence, context, and risk markers. In Pirog-Good, M. A., and Stets, J. E., (eds.),Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues, Praeger, New York.
Weis, J. G. (1989). Family violence research methodology and design. In Ohlin, L. L., and Tonry, M. (eds.),Family Violence, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Windle, M. (1988). Psychometric strategies of measures of temperment: A methodological critique.Int. J. Behav. Devel. 11: 171–201.
Yllo, K. (1989). Political and methodological debates in wife abuse research. In Yllo, K. and Bograd M. (eds.),Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marshall, L.L. The Severity of Violence Against Men Scales. J Fam Viol 7, 189–203 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00979027
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00979027