Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of cognitive set on performance and arousal under different noise loads

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three groups of 12 subjects each performed a mental arithmetic task while exposed to continuous white noise in two experimental sessions. In Session I, each group was exposed to a different noise level [56, 72.5, or 85dB(A)], whereas in Session II all had the medium [72.5 dB(A)] intensity. Arithmetic performance deteriorated with increasing noise intensity in Session I, and in Session II each group retained its position relative to the other two groups. Thus, the higher the noise intensity in the first session, the poorer the performance in the second session. These results suggest that the motivation and energy mobilized in Session II were determined by the cognitive set adopted to meet the demands of Session I. Arousal level, as measured by adrenaline excretion and heart rate, was higher during both experimental sessions than in a control session. The rise in adrenaline output was of the same magnitude regardless of the intensity of the noise, which indicates that the subjects adjusted to the increase in total load by slowing down their performance rather than by raising their energy mobilization. Heart rate rose in response to changes in noise level in Session II relative to Session I, regardless of the direction of the change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson, B., Hovmöller, S., Karlsson, C.-G., & Svensson, S. Analysis of urinary catecholamines: An improved auto-analyzer fluorescence method.Clinica Chimica Acta 1974,51 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E., Borsa, D. M., Hamacher, J. H., & Koenig, I. D. V. Paired-associate learning and the timing of arousal.Journal of Experimental Psychology 1966,72 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E. Effect of noise on an “intellectual” task.Journal of Acoustical Society of America 1958,30 824–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, D. W. J. Noise and loss of sleep.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1962,14 178–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. C., Buchwald, A. M., & Frankmann, R. W. Autonomic and muscular responses, and their relation to simple stimuli.Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 1955,69(20, Whole No. 405).

  • Euler, U. S. v., & Lishajko, F. Improved technique for the fluorimetric estimation of catecholamines.Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 1961,51 348–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenhaeuser, M. Behavior and circulating catecholamines.Brain Research 1971,31 241–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenhaeuser, M. Sympathetic-adrenomedullary activity, behaviour and the psychosocial environment. In P. H. Venables & M. J. Christie (Eds.),Research in psychophysiology. New York: Wiley, 1975. Chap. 4, pp. 71–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenhaeuser, M. The role of peripheral catecholamines in adaptation to understimulation and overstimulation. In G. Serban (Ed.),The psychopathology of human adaptation. New York: Plenum Press, 1976, pp. 173–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenhaeuser, M., & Johansson, G. Task demand as reflected in catecholamine excretion and heart rate.Journal of Human Stress 1976,2 15–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenhaeuser, M., & Lundberg, U. Immediate and delayed effects of noise on performance and arousal.Biological Psychology 1974,2 127–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, D. C., & Singer, J. E.Urban stress. Experiments on noise and social stressors. New York: Academic Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulian, E. Effects of prior acoustic conditions on performance and its psychophysiological correlates.Revue Roumaine des Sciences Sociales-Serie de Psychologie 1974,18(1), 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization.Method for calculating loudness level. ISO/R 532–1966 (E).

  • Jerison, H. J. Effects of noise on human performance.Journal of Applied Psychology 1959,43 96–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D.Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, U. Urban commuting: Crowdedness and catecholamine excretion.Journal of Human Stress 1976,2 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selye, H.Stress without distress. Philadelphia/New York: Lippincott, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. E., Lundberg, U., & Frankenhaeuser, M. Stress on the train: A study of urban commuting.Advances in Environmental Research, in press.

  • Sokolov, E. N.Perception and the conditioned reflex. New York: Macmillan, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. Perceived level of noise by Mark VII and decibels (E).Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1972,51 575–601. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S.Psychophysics and social scaling. Morristown: General Learning Press, 1972. (b)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Financial support was obtained from the Swedish Medical Research Council (Project No. 997) and the Swedish Council for Social Science Research. Lennart Forsman and Gunnar Mellander assisted in the collection and treatment of the data, and Lars Holmberg performed the catecholamine analyses.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frankenhaeuser, M., Lundberg, U. The influence of cognitive set on performance and arousal under different noise loads. Motiv Emot 1, 139–149 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998516

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998516

Keywords

Navigation