Skip to main content
Log in

A review of two measures of pathological gambling in the United States

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses a debate that has emerged in the field of pathological gambling research. This debate concerns measurement of the prevalence of pathological gambling in the general population. Two instruments have been used to measure prevalence in the United States, the South Oaks Gambling Screen and the Cumulative Clinical Signs Method. These instruments are described and several problems with the statistical properties of the Cumulative Clinical Signs Method are discussed. The authors conclude with a call for continued research in the area of prevalence studies of pathological gambling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd Edition. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on the Review of the National Policy Toward Gambling. (1976).Gambling in America. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culleton, R.P. (1985).A survey of pathological gamblers in the state of Ohio. Report prepared for the Ohio Lottery Commission.

  • Culleton, R.P. (1989). The prevalence rates of pathological gambling: A look at methods.Journal of Gambling Behavior, 5, 22–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culleton, R.P. & Lang, M.H. (1985).The prevalence rate of pathological gambling in the Delaware Valley in 1984. Report prepared for People Acting To Help, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Dunne, J.A. (1985). Increasing public awareness of pathological gambling behavior: A history of the National Council on Compulsive Gambling.Journal of Gambling Behavior, 1, 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairley, W.B. & Mosteller, F. (Eds.). (1977).Statistics and public policy. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, M.L. (1988).Casino gambling and college students: Three sequential years of data. Paper presented at the Third National Conference on Gambling Behavior.

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1962).The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R. & Mireault, C. (1988). Gambling behaviors among high school students in the Quebec area.Journal of Gambling Behavior, 4, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H.R. & Blume, S. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers.American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H.R. & Klein, R. (1985).Prisoners, gambling and crime. Paper presented at the meetings of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences.

  • Lesieur, H.R. & Klein, R. (1987). Pathological gambling among high school students.Addictive Behaviors, 12, 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosecrance, J. (1988).Gambling without guilt: The legitimation of an American pastime. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H.J. (1986). Conceptual crises and the addictions: A philosophy of science perspective.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 3, 285–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommers, I. (1988). Pathological gambling: Estimating prevalence and group characteristics.International Journal of the Addictions, 23, 477–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R.A. (1983).Constraints and commitments in the development of American botany, 1880–1920. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R.A. & Steadman, H.J. (1988). Refining prevalence estimates of pathological gambling.American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 502–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R.A. & Steadman, H.J. (1989a). Policy implications of prevalence estimates of pathological gambling. In H.J. Shaffer, S. Stein, B. Gambino & T.N. Cummings (Eds.)Compulsive gambling: Theory, research and practice (pp. 163–174). Boston, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R.A. & Steadman, H.J. (1989b).Problem gambling in Iowa. Report prepared for the Iowa Department of Human Services.

  • Volberg, R.A. & Steadman, H.J. (1989c). Prevalence estimates of pathological gambling in New Jersey and Maryland.American Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 1618–1619.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was partly funded by the Antisocial and Violent Behavior Branch of the National Institute of Mental Health (MH-44295).

The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of Henry J. Steadman, Ph.D. to the initial formulation of the ideas presented here.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Volberg, R.A., Banks, S.M. A review of two measures of pathological gambling in the United States. J Gambling Stud 6, 153–163 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01013495

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01013495

Keywords

Navigation