Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of theophylline pharmacokinetics in a pediatric population using mixed effects models

  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Routine clinical pharmacokinetic data collected prospectively from pediatric patients receiving theophylline were analyzed using the NONMEM (nonlinear mixed effects model) digital computer program. A total of 314 measured serum theophylline concentrations (STCs) were obtained from 84 hospitalized patients ranging in age from 4 months to 15.2 years with the majority of patients between the ages of 1 and 8 years. Fifty-six percent were male. The race/ethnicity distribution was 71.4% Latin, 15.5% black, 11.9% Caucasian, and 1.2% (one subject) Pakistani. Of the total number of observed STCs, 16.2% reflected some degree of outpatient dosing. The pharmacokinetic model used was a one-compartment open model with either zero-order or first-order absorption and first-order elimination. Age was the most important determinant of theophylline clearance (Cl);weight was inferior to age and did not statistically improve the model (p>0.005when combined with age. Total Clincreased by 10%/year over the age range of 1 to 15 years of age. Black race and male gender were associated with higher Clvalues: for a given age, Clwas 34% higher for blacks than the reference population composed of the remaining patients, and Clfor males was 25% higher than that for females. The volume of distribution (Vdfor the population was estimated to be 0.62 L/kg. The interindividual variability in Cland Vdexpressed as coefficients of variation were 19 and 28%, respectively. The residual intraindividual error variance corresponded to a standard deviation of 2.8 μg/ml. The STCs that represented some degree of outpatient dosing were 21 % lower than those reflecting only inpatient dosing. Alternate models that include weight as a determinant of theophylline clearance are also provided. The NONMEM method of determining population pharmacokinetics is well suited to the pediatric population since it does not require a large number of STCs per patient. In this study a mean of only 3.7 STCs per patient were utilized to provide information which should prove useful in the design and adjustment of theophylline dosage regimens in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. H. Jackson, J. I. McHenry, F. B. Moreland, W. J. Raymer, and R. L. Etter. Clinical evaluation of Elixophyllin with correlation of pulmonary function studies and theophylline serum levels in acute and chronic asthma patients.Dis. Chest 45:75 (1964).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. P. A. Mitenko and R. I. Ogilvie. Rational intravenous doses of theophylline.N. Engl. J. Med. 289:600–603 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Levy and R. Koysooko. Pharmacokinetic analysis of the effect of theophylline on pulmonary function in asthmatic childrenJ. Pediat. 86:789–793 (1975).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. F. E. R. Simons, G. H. Luciuk, and K. J. Simons. Sustained release theophylline for treatment of asthma in preschool children.Am. J. Dis. Child. 136:790–793 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. H. J. Neijens, E. J. Duiverman, B. H. Graatsma, and K. F. Kerrebijn. Clinical and bronchodilating efficacy of controlled-release theophylline as a function of its serum concentrations in preschool children.J. Pediat. 107:811–815 (1985).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. D. E. Zaske, K. W. Miller, E. L. Strem, S. Austrian, and P. B. Johnson. Oral aminophylline therapy. Increased dosage requirements in children.J. Am. Med. Assoc. 237:1453–1455 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. W. J. Jusko, J. J. Schentag J. H. Clark, M. Gardner, and A. M. Yurchak. Enhanced biotransformation of theophylline in marijuana and tobacco smokers.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 24:405–410 (1978).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Mangione, T. E. Imhoff, R. V. Lee, L. Y. Shum, and W. J. Jusko. Pharmacokinetics of theophylline in hepatic disease.Chest 73:616–622 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. W. J. Jusko, M. J. Gardner, A. Mangione, J. J. Schentag, J. R. Koup, and J. W. Vance. Factors affecting theophylline clearances: Age, tobacco, marijuana, cirrhosis, congestive heart failure, obesity, oral contraceptives, benzodiazepines, barbituates, and ethanol.J. Pharm. Sci. 68:1358–1366 (1979).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. J. H. G. Jonkman and R. A. Upton. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with theophylline.Clin. Pharmacokin. 9:309–334 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Kappas, K. E. Anderson, A. H. Conney and A. P. Alvares. Influence of dietary protein and carbohydrate on antipyrine and theophylline metabolism in man.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 20:643–653 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. L. B. Sheiner, B. Rosenberg, and K. C. Melmon. Modeling of individual pharmacokinetics for computer-aided drug dosage.Comput. Biomed. Res. 5:441–449 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. L. B. Sheiner, B. Rosenberg, and V. V. Marathe. Estimation of population characteristics of pharmacokinetic parameters from routine clinical data.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 5:445–479 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. L. B. Sheiner and S. L. Beal. Evaluation of methods for estimating population pharmacokinetic parameters. I. Michaelis-Menten model: Routine clinical pharmacokinetic data.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 6:553–571 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. K. E. Opheim, M. R. Glick, C. Ou, K. W. Ryder, L. C. Hood, V. Ainardi, L. A. Collymore, W. De Armas, V. L. Frawley, J. Hutchinson, S. A. Jackson, J. L. Trent, D. K. Taylor, J. C. Baezinger and T. O. Oei. Particle-enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay for theophylline evaluated with the Du Pont aca.Clin. Chem. 30:1870–1874 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. R. A. Upton, L. Sansom, T. W. Guentert, J. R. Powell, J. F. Thiercelin, V. P. Shah, P. E. Coates, and S. Riegelman. Evaluation of the absorption from 15 commercial theophylline products indicating deficiencies in currently applied bioavailability criteria.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 8:229–242 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Weinberger, L. Hendeles, and L. Bighley. The relation of product formulation to absorption of oral theophyllineNew Engl. J. Med. 299:852–857 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. J. R. Haltom and S. J. Szefler. Theophylline absorption in young asthmatic children receiving sustained release formulations.J. Pediat. 107:805–810 (1985).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Pedersen and J. Møller-Petersen. Erratic absorption of a slow-release theophylline sprinkle product.Pediatrics 74:534–553 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. L. Hendeles, R. P. Infante, and M. Weinberger. A clinical and pharmacokinetic basis for the selection and use of slow release theophylline products.Clin. Pharmacokin. 9:95–135 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. L. Hendeles and M. Weinberger. Theophylline. A “state of the art” review.Pharmacotherapy 3:2–44 (1983).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. P. O. Fagerstrom. Absorption pattern of different sustained release preparations. In F. W. H. M. Merkus and L. Hendeles (eds.),Theophylline: A Biopharmaceutical Challenge to a Clinical Need, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, 1983, pp. 108–117.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. A. Osman, R. B. Patel, and P. G. Welling. Absorption of theophylline from sustained release formulations. In F. W. H. M. Merkus and L. Hendeles (eds.)Theophylline: A Biopharmaceutical Challenge to a Clinical Need, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, 1983, pp. 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. P. Rosen, M. Danish, M. C. Ragni, C. L. Saccar, S. J. Yaffe, and H. I. Lecks. Theophylline pharmacokinetics in the young infant.Pediatrics 64:248–251 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. L. Hendeles, L. Vaughan, M. Weinberger, and G. Smith. Influence of gender on theophylline dosage requirements in children with chronic asthma.Drug Intell. Clin. Pharm. 15:338–340 (1981).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. E. F. Ellis, R. Koysooko, and G. Levy. Pharmacokinetics of theophylline in children with asthma.Pediatrics 58:542–547 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. F. E. R. Simons and K. J. Simons. Pharmacokinetics of theophylline in infancy.J. Clin. Pharmacol. 18:472–476 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. E. Ginchansky and M. Weinberger. Relationship of theophylline clearance to oral dosage in children with chronic asthma.J. Pediat. 91:655–660 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. J. D. Arnold, G. N. Hill, and L. N. Sansom. A comparison of the pharmacokinetics of theophylline in asthmatic children in the acute episode and in remission.Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 20:443–447 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. P. D. Walson, R. C. Strunk, and L. M. Taussig. Intrapatient variability in theophylline kinetics.J. Pediat. 91:321–324 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. P. Leung, A. Kalisker, and T. D. Bell. Variation in theophylline clearance rate with time in chronic childhood asthma.J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 59:440–444 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. G. J. Kaldec, L. T. Ha, C. H. Jarbor, D. Richards, and J. M. Karibo. Theophylline half-life in infants and young children.Ann. Allergy 40:303–310 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  33. M. J. Gardner and W. J. Jusko. Effect of age and sex on theophylline clearance in young subjects.Pediat. Pharmacol. 2:157–169 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. A. F. Isles, P. H. Scott, E. Tabachnik, H. Levinson, S. M. Macleod, C. Newth, and M. Spino. Circadian variation in theophylline disposition in asthmatic children. In L. F. Soyka and G. P. Redmond (eds.),Drug Metabolism in the Immature Human, Raven Press, New York, 1981, pp. 241–247.

    Google Scholar 

  35. P. M. Loughnan, D. S. Sitar, R. I. Ogilvie, A. Eisen, Z. Fox and A. H. Neims. Pharmacokinetic analysis of the disposition of intravenous theophylline in young children.J. Pediat. 5:874–879 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. K. Wilson. Sex-related differences in drug disposition in man.Clin. Pharmacokin. 9:182–202 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. S. M. MacLeod, K. W. Renton, and N. R. Eade. Development of hepatic microsomal drug-oxidizing enzymes in immature male and female rats.J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 183:489–498 (1972).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. D. W. J. Clark. Genetically-determined variability in acetylation and oxidation: Therapeutic implications.Drugs 29:342–375 (1985).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. R. Dahlqvist, L. Bertilisson, D. J. Birkett, M. Eichelbaum, J. Sawe, and F. Sjoqvist. Theophylline metabolism in relation to antipyrine, debrisoquine, and sparteine metabolism.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 35:170–182 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. M. Miller, K. E. Opheim, V. A. Raisys, and A. G. Motulsky. Theophylline metabolism: Variation and genetics.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 35:170–182 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. K. A. Conrad and J. R. Woodworth. Orciprenaline does not alter theophylline elimination.Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 12: 756–757 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. P. Godard, P. Selles, J. Bres, C. Terral, S. Brun, J. Bousquet, and F. B. Michel. Influence d'un betamimetique sur les parametres pharmacocinetiques de la theophylline (Abstract).Rev. Franc. Allerg. Immunol. Clin. 21:3 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  43. S. M. Madsen and U. Ribel. Pharmacokinetics of terbutaline and theophylline in guinea pigs when administered simultaneously.Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol. 48:13–20 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. M. P. Hemstreet, M. V. Miles, and R. O. Rutland. Effect of intravenous isoproterenol on theophylline kinetics.J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 69:360–364 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Y. Danziger, M. Garty, B. Volwitz, D. Ilfeld, I. Varsano, and J. B. Rosenfeld. Reduction of serum theophylline levels by terbutaline in children with asthma.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 37:469–471 (1985).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. T. P. Lombardi, J. S. Bertino, A. Goldberg, E. Middleton, and R. L. Slaughter. The effects of a beta-2 agonist and a non-selective beta antagonist on theophylline clearance (Abstract).Drug Intell. Clin. Pharm. 20:19 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  47. D. Berdel, R. Süverkrüp, G. Heimann, A. V. Berg, N. Liappis and A. Stühmer. Total theophylline clearance in childhood: the influence of age-dependent changes in metabolism and elimination.Eur. J. Pediat. 146:41–43 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. D. D. Tang-Liu, R. L. Williams, and S. Riegelman. Nonlinear theophylline elimination.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 31:358–369 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. M. Weinberger and E. Ginchansky. Dose-dependent kinetics of theophylline disposition in asthmatic children.J. Pediat. 91:820–824 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. E. Sarrazin, L. Hendeles, M. Weinberger, K. Muir, and S. Riegelman. Dose-dependent kinetics for theophylline: Observations among ambulatory asthmatic children.J. Pediat. 97:825–828 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Driscoll, M.S., Ludden, T.M., Casto, D.T. et al. Evaluation of theophylline pharmacokinetics in a pediatric population using mixed effects models. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 17, 141–168 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059025

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059025

Key words

Navigation