Skip to main content
Log in

The discrepancy between echocardiography, cineventriculography and thermodilution

Evaluation of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction

  • Articles
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have often experienced disagreement in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV) and ejection fraction (EF) between cineventriculography and echocardiography not performed simultaneously, and unnaturally hyperdynamic left ventricular wall motion. We determined EDV, ESV, stroke volume, and EF (with modified Simpson's rule) in 65 consecutive patients using 2-dimensional echocardiography with a 2.5 MHz, 128-element phased-array transducer within three days of cardiac catheterization and compared our results with those obtained by the thermodilution technique and biplane cineventriculography. Heart rate and stroke volume were significantly different among the three techniques: cineventriculography yielded the highest values. These findings suggest that patients may have been in a hyperadrenergic state caused by anxiety experienced during invasive cineventriculography and thermodilution examinations. Inter- and intraobserver variabilities for echocardiography differed little from the variability in cineventriculography. Although there were good correlations between echocardiographic and cineventriculographic findings for EDV (r=0.67), ESV (r=0.80), and EF (r=0.78) by two independent observers, there was a lack of agreement for EDV, ESV, and EF. Echocardiographic EDV values were significantly lower than cineventriculographic values. When left ventricular function is good, the left ventricle tends to be hyperadrenergic and in a more hyperdynamic state with smaller ESV than echocardiographic values during cineventriculography. When left ventricular function is poor, the left ventricle tends to be influenced by the effect of the contrast medium and stress during the invasive examinations and in a more hypodynamic state with larger ESV than echocardiographic values during cineventriculography. The echocardiography is highly reproducible and may provide information that is not available from cineventriculography and thermodilution. Cineventriculography may provide another manifestation of cardiac reserve. In conclusion, we must take into account each peculiar property of the echocardiography, the cineventriculography, or the thermodilution technique when patients are examined with cardiac conditions by different methods at different days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eaton LW, Maughan WL, Shoukas AA, Weiss JL. Accurate volume determination in the isolated ejecting canine left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1979; 60: 320–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schapira JN, Kohn MS, Beaver WL, Popp RL. In vitro quantitation of canine left ventricular volume by phased array sector scan. Cardiology 1981;67: 1–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Helak JW, Reichek N. Quantitation of human left ventricular mass and volume by two-dimensional echocardiography: in vitro anatomic validation. Circulation 1981;63: 1398–407.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dodge HT, Sandier H, Ballew DW, Lord JD. The use of biplane angiocardiography for measurement of left ventricular volume in man. Am Heart J 1960; 60: 762–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mullins CB, Mason DT, Ashburn WL, Ross J. Determination of ventricular volume by radioisotope angiography. Am J Cardiol 1969; 24: 72–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schiller NB, Acquatella H, Ports TA, et al. Left ventricular volume from paired biplane two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1979; 60: 547–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carr KW, Bugler RL, Forsythe JR, Johnson AD, Gosink B. Measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by mechanical cross-sectional echocardiography. Circulation 1979; 59: 1196–206.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Holland ED, Parisi AF. Moynihan PF, Jones DR, Feldman CL, Tow DE. Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes by real-time, two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1979; 60: 760–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schnittger I, Fitzgerald PJ, Daughters GT, Ingels NB, Kantrowitz NE, Schwartzkopf A, Mead CW, Popp RL. Limitations of compairing left ventricular volumes by two dimensional echocardiography, myocardial markers and cineangiography. Am J Cardiol 1982; 50: 512–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bengur AR, Snider AR, Vermilion RP, Freeland JC. Left ventricular ejection fraction measured with Doppler color flow mapping techniques. Am J Cardiol 1991; 68: 669–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith MD, Macphail B, Harrison MR, Lenhoff SJ, Demaria AN. Value and limitations of transesophageal echocardiography in determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 1213–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Levett JM. Replogle RL. Current research review: thermodilution cardiac output: a critical analysis and review of the literature. J Surg Res 1979; 27: 392–404.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mackenzie JD, Haites NE, Rawles JM. Method of assessing the reproducibility of blood flow measurement: factors influencing the performance of thermodilution cardiac output computers. Br Heart J 1986; 55: 14–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ihlen Halfdan, Endresen K, Golf S, Nitter-Hauge S. Cardiac stroke volume during exercise measured by Doppler echocardiography: comparison with the thermodilution technique and evaluation of reproducibility. Br Heart J 1987; 58: 455–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, DeMaria A, Devereux R, Feigenbaum H, Gutgesell H, Reichek N, Sahn D, Schnittger I, Silverman NH, Tajik AJ. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echo 1989; 2: 358–67.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bland JM, Airman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986 February; 8: 307–10.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gordon EP, Schnittger I, Fitzgerald PJ, Williams P, Popp RL. Reproducibility of left ventricular volumes by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983; 2: 506–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takenaka, A., Iwase, M., Sobue, T. et al. The discrepancy between echocardiography, cineventriculography and thermodilution. Int J Cardiac Imag 11, 255–262 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01145194

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01145194

Key words

Navigation