Skip to main content
Log in

Fundus pigmentation and the electroretinographic luminance-response function

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dark-adapted and light-adapted electroretinogaphic luninance-response functions were recorded from subjects with light or dark fundus pigmentation based on digitized fundus photographs. For dark- and light-adapted electroretinograms, subjects with dark fundi had smaller b-wave amplitudes at all luminance levels. There was no significant difference in b-wave implicit time for the dark-adapted electroretinogram, but there was a significant difference for the light-adapted ERG between the two groups. The results suggest that fundus pigmentation should be considered in the interpretation of electroretinogram results. A possible mechanism for the influence of fundus pigmentation on b-wave amplitude is based on increased resistance associated with melanin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ISI:

interstimulus interval

L-R function:

luminance-response function

ND:

neutral density

References

  1. Wali N, Leguire LE. Fundus pigmentation and the dark-adapted electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 1992; 80: 1–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Naka KI, Rushton WAH. S-potentials from color units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae). J Physiol 1966; 185: 536–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wali N, Leguire LE. Dark-adapted luminance-response functions with skin and corneal electrodes. Doc Ophthalmol 1991; 76: 367–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Doslak MJ, Plonsey R, Thomas CW. The effects of variations of the conducting media inhomogeneities on the electroretinogram. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1980; 27: 88–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Steinberg RH, Linsenmeier RA, Griff ER. Retinal pigment epithelial cell contributions to the electroretinogram and electrooculogram. Prog Retinal Res 1985; 4: 33–66.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rodieck RW. The vertebrate retina. Principles of structure and function. San Francisco: WH Freeman, 1973: 525–36.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weiter J, Delori FC, Wing GL, Fitch KA. Retinal pigment epithelial lipofuscin and melanin and choroidal melanin in human eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1986; 27: 145–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Faber DS. Analysis of the slow transretinal potentials in response to light. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York, 1969. Dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  9. McGinness J, Proctor P. Amorphous semiconductor switching in melanins. Science 1974; 183: 853–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pethig R. Electronic properties of biomacromolecules. In: Dielectric and electronic properties of biological materials. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1979: 343–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Filatovs J, McGinness J, Corry P. Thermal and electronic contributions to switching in melanins. Biopolymers 1976; 15: 2309–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wali N, Leguire LE. The photopic hill: A new phenomenon of the light adapted electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 1992; 80: 335–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wali, N., Leguire, L.E. Fundus pigmentation and the electroretinographic luminance-response function. Doc Ophthalmol 84, 61–69 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01203283

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01203283

Keywords

Navigation