Abstract
The problem of sexual harassment in the workplace can be viewed within the framework of personal control. In particular, sexual harassment can be viewed as an infringement upon employees' rights to control the conditions under which they work. Targets of harassment must tolerate sexual harassment to avoid negative consequences such as termination, demotion, distasteful remarks or jokes, and so forth. Previous research (Wortman & Brehm, 1975; Greenberger & Strasser, 1986) into personal control has drawn upon two theories—reactance theory and learned helplessness theory—to explain behavioral responses to infringement upon personal control. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of personal control theories in explaining responses of targets who file discrimination suits.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramson, L., Seligman, M. E. P. & Teasdale, J. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 87, 49–74.
Aiken, M. & Hage, J. (1966). Organizational alienation: A comparative analysis.American Sociological Review, 31, 497–507.
Baucom, D. J. & Danker-Brown, P. (1979). Influence of sex roles on the development of learned helplessness.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 928–936.
Blauner, R. (1964).Alienation and Freedom: The Factory Worker and His Industry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brehm, J. W. (1966).A Theory of Psychological Reactance. New York: Academic Press.
Brehm, J. W. (1972).Responses to Loss of Freedom: A Theory of Psychological Reactance. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
Brewin, C. R. (1985). Depression and causal attributions: What is their relation?Psychological Bulletin, 98, 297–309.
Brown, J. D. & Siegel, J. M. (1988). Attributions for negative life and depression: The role of perceived control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 316–322.
Corley v. Conrail, 34 FEP 129, E.D. Michigan (1982).
Davis v. Western Southern Life Ins. Co., 34 FEP 97, N.D. Ohio (1984).
Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1980). An analysis of learned helplessness: II. The processing of success.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 940–952.
Dillon v. Chrysler Corp., 35 FEP 1871, E.D. Missouri (1981).
diTomaso, N. (1989). Sexuality in the workplace: Discrimination and harassment. In: Hearn, J., Burrell, G., Sheppard, D. & Tancred-Sheriff, P. (Eds.),Sexuality in the Organization, 71–90. London: Sage Publications.
Greenberger, D. B. & Straser, S. (1986). Development and application of a model of personal control in organizations.Academy of Management Review, 11, 164–177.
Groth, N. A. (1979).Men Who Rape: The Psychology of the Offender. New York: Plenum Publishing Co.
Gutek, B. A. (1990). Predicting social-sexual behavior at work: A contract hypothesis.Academy of Management Journal, 33, 560–577.
Gutek, B. A. (1985).Sex and the Workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Heath, L. & Davidson, L. (1988). Dealing with the threat of rape: Reactance or learned helplessness?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1334–1351.
Hill v. BASF Wyandotte Corp., 27 FEP 66, E. D. Michigan (1981).
Hiroto, D. S. (1974). Locus of control and learned helplessness.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 187–193.
Jensen, I. & Gutek, B. (1982). Attributions and assignment of responsibility for sexual harassment.Journal of Social Issues, 38, 121–137.
Johnson, P. B. (1976). Women and power: Toward a theory of effectiveness.Journal of Social Issues, 32, 99–110.
Klink v. Ransey County, 43 FEP 1476, Minn. Ct. of App. (1986).
Krantz, D. S., Glass, D. C. & Synder, M. L. (1974). Helplessness, stress level, and the coronary-prone behavior pattern.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 284–300.
Krulewitz, J. E., & Payne, E. J. (1977). Sex differences in attributions about rape, rapists, and rape victims. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.
Larwood, L. & Wood, M. M. (1977).Women in Management. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Livington, J. (1982). Responses of sexual harassment on the job: Legal, organizational and individual actions.Journal of Social Issues, 38, 5–22.
Mainiero, L. A. (1986). Coping with powerlessness: The relationship of gender and job dependency to empowerment-strategy usage.Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 633–653.
Martinko, M. J. & Gardner, W. L. (1982). Learned helplessness: An alternative explanation for performance deficits.Academy of Management Review, 7, 195–204.
Medea, A., & thompson, K. (1974).Against Rape. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.
Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 106 S.Ct. 2399 (1986).
Nieva, V. F., & Gutek, B. A. (1981).Women and Work: A Psychological Perspective. New York: Praeger.
Overmier, J. B., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1967). Effects of inescapable shock upon subsequent escape and avoidance learning.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 63, 28–33.
Pittman, T. S., & Pittman, N. L. (1980). Deprivation of control and the attribution process.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 377–389.
Pryor, J. (1987). Sexual harassment proclivities in men.Sex Roles, 17, 269–290.
Radloff, L. & Monroe, M. (1978). Sex differences in helplessness—With implications for depression. In Hanson, L. S. & Rapoza, R. S. (Eds.),Career Development and Counseling for Women, 199–221. Springfield, JL: Charles C Thomas.
Reichman v. Bureau of Affirmative Action, 30 FEP 1644, M.D. Pennsylvania (1982).
Rinkel v. Aslsociated Pipeline Contractors, 17 FEP 224, D.C. Alaska (1978).
Seligman, M. E. P. (1974). Depression and learned helplessness. In Friedman, R. J. & Katz, M. M. (Eds.).The Psychology of Depression: Contemporary Theory and Research, 83–113. Washington, DC: Winston-Wiley.
Shaffer v. National Can Corp., 34 FEP 172, E.D. Pennsylvania (1983).
Sheppard, D. (1989). Sexuality and social construction of organizational power: The image and self-image of women managers. In Hearn, J., Burrell, G., Sheppard, D. & Tancred-Sheriff, P. (Eds.),Sexuality in the Organization, 139–157. London: Sage.
Tangri, S., Burt, M. & Johnson, (1982). Sexual harassment at work: Three explanatory models.Journal of Social Issues, 38, 33–54.
Terpstra, D., & Baker, D. D. (1988). Outcomes of sexual harassment charges.Academy of Management Journal 31, 185–194.
Terpstra, D. & Cook, S. (1985). Complaint characteristics and reported behaviors and consequences association with formal sexual harassment charges.Personal Psychology, 38, 559–574.
Thacker, R. A. (1992). Preventing sexual harassment in the workplace.Training and Development, 46, 50–53.
Thacker, R. A. & Ferris, G. R. (1991). Understanding sexual harassment in the workplace: The influence of power and politics within the dyadic interaction of harasser and target.Human Resource Management Review, 1, 23–37.
United States Merit Systems Protection Board (1981).Sexual Harassment in the Federal Workplace: Is It a Problem? Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
United States Merit Systems Protection Board (1988).Sexual Harrassment in the Federal Government: An update. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Wicklund, R. A. (1974).Freedom and Reactance. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Wortman, C. B. & Brehm, J. W. (1975). Responses to uncontrollable outcomes: An integration of reactance theory and the learned helplessness model. In Berkowitz, L. (Eds.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 8, 278–337. New York: Academic Press.
York, K. M. (1989). Defining sexual harassment in workplaces: A policy-capturing approach.Academy of Management Journal, 32, 830–850.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thacker, R.A. A descriptive study of behavioral responses of sexual harassment targets: Implications for control theory. Employ Respons Rights J 5, 155–171 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384734
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384734