Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Duration of symptoms as a predictor of outcome after lumbar disc surgery

  • Clinical Articles
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Retrospectively 93 consecutive patients operated on for lumbar disc herniation were studied in order to evaluate the prognostic value of symptoms (lumbar pain and sciatica) and sick-leave. Surgical results were evaluated 1–3 years postoperatively by a questionaire. The duration of the present attack of sciatica and sick-leave prior to surgery was significantly longer in the group with unsatisfactory outcome compared to the group with satisfactory outcome. Patients with duration of the present attack of sciatica of less than 6 months had a significantly better result concerning outcome compared to patients with duration of 6–12 months and more than 12 months.

Patients who returned to the same type of work had a pre-operatively statistically significant shorter duration of present sick-leave, compared to the patients who had changed the type of work and the patients who did not return to work.

The patients with duration of their present sick-leave of less than 6 months had a significantly higher percentage of returning to the same type of work compared to patients with duration of their present sick-leave of 6–12 months and more than 12 months.

We conclude that the duration of sciatica and sick-leave before the operation has value as predictive factors concerning the over-all result after surgery for lumbar disc herniation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abramowitz JN, Neff SR (1991) Lumbar disc surgery: the results of the prospective lumbar discectomy study of the joint section on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Neurosurgery 29: 301–307

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrios C, Achmed M, Arrotegui JI, Bjornsson A (1990) Clinical factors predicting outcome after surgery for herniated lumbar disc: an epidemiological multivariate analysis. J Spinal Disord 3: 205–209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dvorak J, Gauchat MH, Valach L (1988) The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation. A 4–17 years follow-up with emphasis on somatic aspects. Spine 13: 1418–1422

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dvorak J, Valach L, Fuhrimann P, Heim E (1988) The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation. A 4–17 years follow-up with emphasis on psychosocial aspects. Spine 13: 1423–1427

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Falc B, Nykvist F, Hurme M, Alaranta H (1993) Prognostic value of EMG in patients with lumbar disc herniation — a five year follow-up. Electromygr Clin Neurophysiol 33: 19–26

    Google Scholar 

  6. Finneson BE, Cooper VR (1979) A lumbar disc surgery predictive score card: a retrospective evaluation. Spine 4: 141–146

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Haaland AK, Graver V, Ljunggren AE, Loeb M, Lie H, Magnæs B, Godal HC (1992) Fibrinolytic activity as a predictor of the outcome of prolapsed intervertebral lumbar disc surgery with reference to background variables: results of a prospective cohort study. Spine 17: 1024–1027

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herron L, Turner J (1985) Patient selection for lumbar laminectomy and discectomy with a revised obective rating system. Clin Orthop 199: 145–152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Herron L, Turner JA, Ersek M, Weiner P (1992) Does the millon behavioral health inventory (MBHI) predict lumbar laminectomy outcome? A comparison with the Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory (MMPI). J Spinal Disord 5: 188–192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hurme M, Alaranta H (1987) Factors predicting the result of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 12: 933–938

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis PJ, Weir BKA, Broad RW, Grace GG (1987) Long-term prospective study of lumbosacral discectomy. J Neurosurg 67: 49–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nachemson A (1969) Intradiscal measurements of pH in patients with lumbar rhizopathies. Acta Orthop Scand 140: 23–42

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nystram B (1987) Experience of microsurgical compared with conventional technique in lumbar disc operations. Acta Neurol Scand 76: 129–141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Spengler DM, Freeman CW (1979) Patient selection for lumbar discectomy, an objective approach. Spine 4: 129–134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation a controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 8: 131–140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway

    Ø. P. Nygaard, B. Romner & J. H. Trumpy

Authors
  1. Ø. P. Nygaard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Romner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. H. Trumpy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nygaard, Ø.P., Romner, B. & Trumpy, J.H. Duration of symptoms as a predictor of outcome after lumbar disc surgery. Acta neurochir 128, 53–56 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01400653

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01400653

Keywords

Search

Navigation