Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical experience with a new pressure-adjustable shunt valve

  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The pressure-adjustable valve system Codman Medos allows valve pressure adjustment in 18 steps between 30 and 200 mm H2O. A series of 90 patients, 15 children and 75 adults, who were shunted with this new programmable valve, is reported. Indication for shunt insertion were various types of hydrocephalus in 79 cases, malfunction of a medium pressure membrane valve shunt system in 9 cases and an arachnoid cyst and pseudotumour each in one case. The valve pressure was programmed prior to insertion to 200 mm H2O in the adults and according to age in children and was modified postoperatively according to the clinical course.

Underdrainage with subdural fluid collections appearing in 5 patients could be managed by valve pressure adjustment alone in 2 cases. One malfunctioning of the valve mechanism was due to mechanical obstruction. At the time of follow-up, 7 to 29 months after operation, outcome was excellent in 64 patients, good with marked improvement but residual symptoms in 19 patients and unchanged in 7 patients.

The possibility of adjusting the valve pressure to the patient's demands was frequently used in children and adult normal pressure hydrocephalus patients with satisfying clinical results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aschoff A, Benesch C, Kremer P, von Haken MS, Klank A, Osterloh M, Fruh K (1993) The solved and unsolved problems of hydrocephalus valves: a critical comment. Advances in Neurosurgery, Vol 21. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 103–114

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aschoff A, Kramer P, Benesch C, Klank A (1991) Shunt-technology and overdrainage-a critical review of hydrostatic, programmable and variable-resistance valves and flow-reducing devices. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1 [Suppl 1]: 49–50

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barnett GH, Hahn JF, Palmer J (1987) Normal pressure hydrocephalus in children and young adults. Neurosurgery 20: 904–907

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brogesen SE, Gjerris F (1987) Relationships between intracranial pressure, ventricular size, and resistance to CSF outflow. J Neurosurg 67: 535–539

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chabra DK, Agrawal GD, Mittal P (1993) “Z” flow hydrocephalus shunt, a new approach to the problem of hydrocephalus, the rational behind its design and the initial results of pressure monitoring after “Z” flow shunt implantation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 121: 43–47

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dietrich U, Lumenta C, Sprick C, Majewski B (1987) Subdural hematoma in a case of hydrocephalus and macrocrania. Experience with a pressure-adjustable valve. Childs Nerv Syst 3: 242–244

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Faulhauer K, Schmitz P (1978) Overdrainage phenomena in shunt treated hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 45: 89–101

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gaab MR (1981) Die Registrierung des intrakraniellen Druckes, Grundlagen, Ergebnisse und Möglichkeiten. Habil. Schrift, Medizinische Fakultät, Würzburg

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gaab MR, Koos WT (1984) Hydrocephalus in infancy and childhood: diagnosis and indication for operation. Neuropediatrics 15: 173–179

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hakim C (1985) The physics and pathophysiology of the hydraulic complex of the central nervous system. The mechanics of hydrocephalus and normal pressure hydrocephalus. Ph D Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  11. Hakim S (1969) Observation on the physiopathology of the CSF pulse and prevention of ventricular catheter obstruction in valve shunts. Develop Med Child Neurol 11 [Suppl 20]: 42–48

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hakim S, Duran de la Roche F, Burton JD (1973) A critical analysis of valve shunts used in the treatment of hydrocephalus. Develop Med Child Neurol 15: 230–255

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hakim S, Venegas JG, Burton JD (1976) The physics of the cranial cavity, hydrocephalus and normal pressure hydrocephalus: mechanical interpretation and mathematical model. Surg Neurol 5: 187–210

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kosteljanetz M (1985) Resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid determined by bolus injection technique and constant rate steady infusion in humans. Neurosurgery 16: 336–340

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kremer P, Aschoff A, Kunze S (1991) Therapeutic risks of anti-siphon deivces. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1 [Suppl 1]: 47–48

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kuurne T, Servo A, Porras M (1983) Subdural effusions reappearing after shunts in patients with non-tumoral stenosis of the aqueduct. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 67: 127–134

    Google Scholar 

  17. Larsson A, Jensen C, Bilting M, Ekholm S, Stephensen H, Wikkelsö C (1992) Does the shunt opening pressure influence the effect of shunt surgery in normal pressure hydrocephalus? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 117: 15–22

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lumenta CB, Roosen N, Dietrich U (1990) Clinical experience with a pressure-adjustable valve Sophy in the management of hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 6: 270–274

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McCullough DC (1986) Symptomatic progressive ventriculomegaly in hydrocephalies with patent shunts and antisiphon devices. Neurosurgery 19: 617–621

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McQuarrie IG, Sainte-Luise L, Scherer P (1984) Treatment of normal pressure hydrocephalus with low versus medium pressure cerebrospinal fluid shunts. Neurosurgery 15: 484–488

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Penn RD, Bacus JW (1984) The brain as a sponge: a computed tomographic look at Hakim's hypothesis. Neurosurgery 14: 670–675

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Portnoy HD, Schulte RR, Fox JL, Croissant PD, Tripp L (1973) Anti-siphon and reversible occlusion valves for shunting in hydrocephalus and preventing post-shunt subdural hematomas. J Neurosurg 38: 729–738

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Portnoy HD, Tripp L, Croissant PD (1976) Hydrodynamics of shunt valves. Childs Brain 2: 242–256

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pudenz RH, Foltz EL (1991) Hydrocephalus: overdrainage by ventricular shunts. A review and recommendations. Surg Neurol 35: 200–212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sainte-Rose C, Hooven MD, Hirsch JF (1987) A new approach in the treatment of hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 66: 213–226

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sindou M, Guyotat-Pelissou I, Chidiac A, Goutelle A (1993) Transcutaneous pressure adjustable valve for the treatment of hydrocephalus and arachnoid cysts in adults. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 121: 135–139

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sutcliffe JC, Battersby RDE (1992) Do we need variable pressure shunts? Br J Neurosurg 6: 67–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tans JTJ, Poortvliet DCJ (1989) Relationship between compliance and resistance to outflow of CSF in adult hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 71: 59–62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Walsh JW, James HE (1982) Subtemporal craniectomy and elevation of shunt valve opening pressure in the management of small ventricle-induced cerebrospinal fluid shunt dysfunction. Neurosurgery 10: 698–703

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wiedemayer H, Sackers S (1993) Clinical experience with a new flow-regulating hydrocephalus shunt system. Advances in Neurosurgery, Vol 21. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 151–155

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reinprecht, A., Czech, T. & Dietrich, W. Clinical experience with a new pressure-adjustable shunt valve. Acta neurochir 134, 119–124 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01417677

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01417677

Keywords

Navigation