Abstract
Work in vitro has previously shown superior restoration of knee stability using a double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction compared with single bundles taken through the condyle or ‘over the top’. This paper describes an animal study designed to compare the three ACL reconstructions in vivo, in order to collect data that could support the clinical use of a double-bundle reconstruction. The three methods were compared in three groups of eight sheep, the ovine ACL having a distinct double-bundle structure. Biomechanically matched polyester fibre implants were used, with 6 months in vivo. The three methods led to similar intra-articular fibrous tissue integration of the implants and no evidence of implant damage, and biomechanical testing found greater laxity than normal for all three groups. The double-bundle group, however, had more joint surface degeneration than the other groups. It was concluded that clinical use of the double-bundle reconstruction was not indicated by the results of this experiment, in view of the more complex surgery and lack of superior performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amis AA (1988) The strength of artificial ligament anchorages—a comparative experimental study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 70: 397–403
Amis AA (1989) Anterior cruciate ligament replacement-knee stability and the effects of implants. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 71:819–824
Amis AA, Dawkins GPC (1991) Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament: fibre bundle actions related to ligament replacements and injuries. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 73: 260–267
Amis AA, Kempson SA, Campbell JR, Miller JH (1988) Anterior cruciate ligament implants: biocompatibility and biomechanics of polyester or carbon fibre implants in rabbits. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 70:628–634
Amis AA, Camburn M, Kempson SA, Radford WJP, Stead AC (1992) Anterior cruciate ligament replacement with polyester fibre—a long term study of tissue reactions and joint stability in the sheep. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 73:605–613
Bancroft JD, Cook HC (1984) Manual of histological techniques. Churchill Livingstone. Edinburgh
Brantigan OC, Voshell AF (1941) The mechanics of the ligaments and menisci of the knee joint. J Bone Joint Surg 23:44–66
Butler DL, Grood ES, Noyes FR, Olmstead ML, Hohn RB, Arnoczky SP (1989) Mechanical properties of primate vascularised versus nonvascularised patellar tendon grafts; changes over time. J Orthop Res 7:68–79
Girgis FG, Marshall JL, Al Monajem ARS (1975) The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint: anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop 106:216–231
Kurosawa H, Yamakoshi K-I, Yasuda K, Sasaki T (1991) Simultaneous measurement of changes in length of the cruciate ligaments during knee motion. Clin Orthop 265:233–240
Meachim G (1972) Light microscopy of Indian ink preparations of fibrillated cartilage. Ann Rheum Dis 31:457–464
Mott HW (1983) Semitendinosus anatomic reconstruction for cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Orthop 172:90–92
Radford WJP, Amis AA (1990) Biomechanics of a double prosthetic ligament in the anterior cruciate deficient knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 73:1038–1043
Sapega AA, Moyer RA, Schneck C, Komalahiranya N (1990) Testing for isometry during reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72:259–267
Zaricznyj B (1987) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee using a doubled tendon graft. Clin Orthop 220:162–175
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Radford, W.J.P., Amis, A.A., Kempson, S.A. et al. A comparative study of single-and double-bundle ACL reconstructions in sheep. Knee Surg, Sports traumatol, Arthroscopy 2, 94–99 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01476480
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01476480