Skip to main content
Log in

Computed radiographic absorptiometry and morphometry in the assessment of postmenopausal bone loss

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The best method for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk is currently considered to be bone densitometry. The most commonly used dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) methods may sometimes not predict bone mass accurately in every skeletal site, are expensive and not widely available. The recent development of computed analysis of a plain radiograph of the hand might provide a practical, inexpensive and rapid method for evaluation of bone mineral status. In this study we evaluated 20 healthy premenopausal and 660 postmenopausal women. In 36 of these subjects a second evaluation was carried out after 2 years of therapy with calcium supplements. The internal and external diameters of the second metacarpal and the metacarpal and ultradistal radial bone density were evaluated using a technical device developed in our laboratory and marketed by NIM, Verona, Italy (Osteoradiometer). The radio-graphic images, captured by a video camera, were digitized and studied by computed analysis. In 150 subjects bone density at the level of the lumbar spine, femur, and ultradistal and proximal radius was also measured by DXA techniques. Both external (D) and internal (d) diameters increase significantly with age and years since menopause (YSM), whereas metacarpal index (Dd/D) and metacarpal and ultradistal radial bone density decrease significantly with age and YSM. The ratio between metacarpal bone mineral content and the cortical area (volumetric metacarpal bone density) did not change with age. Significant correlations were found between radiometric findings and DXA measurements. The best correlation coefficients were between bone density measured at the level of the ultradistal radius by DXA and radiographic absorptiometry. In the 2-year follow-up study, a 4.9% and 6.2% decline in radial metacarpal bone density respectively were observed, but the difference was statistically significant only for the latter. In conclusion, computed radiogrammetry is closely correlated with all DXA measurements and may be useful in screening of large populations, providing a simple, inexpensive and sufficiently precise method for evaluation of bone mineral status. Further studies are warranted for assessing the accuracy of radiogrammetry for longitudinal investigations and its capacity to predict fracture risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a World Health Organization Study Group. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Riggs BL, Melton LJ Involutional osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1986;314:1676–86.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hui SL. Slemenda CW, Johnston CC Jr. Baseline measurement of bone mass predicts fracture in white women. Ann Intern Med 1989;11:355–61.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cummings SR, Black DM, Browner WS, et al. Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. The study of the Osetoporotic Fractures Research Group. JAMA 1990;263:665–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eastell R, Riggs BL. Diagnostic evaluation of osteoporosis. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1988;17:547–71.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johnston CC Jr, Slemenda CV, Melton LJ III. Clinical use of bone densitometry. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1105–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Albanese AA, Edelson AH, Lorenze EJ, Wein EH. Quantitative radiography survey technique for detection of bone loss. J Am Geriatr Soc 1969;17:142–54.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Horsman A, Simpson M. Measurement of sequential changes in cortical bone geometry. Br J Radiol 1975;48:471–6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meema HE, Meema S. Radiogrammetry. In: Cohn S, editor. Noninvasive measurements of bone mass and their clinical applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1981:5–50.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dequeker J. Precision of the radiogrammatic evaluation of bone mass at the metacarpal bone. In: Dequeker J, Johnston CC, editors. Non-invasive bone measurements: methodological problems. Oxford: IRL Press, 1982:27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miller CG, Herd RJM, Ramalingam T, Fogelman I, Blake GM. ultransonic velocity measurements through the calcaneus: which velocity should be measured? Osteoporosis Int 1993;3:31–5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meema HE, Meindok H. Advantages of peripheral radiogrammetry over dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine in the assessment of prevalence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in women. J Bone Miner Res 1992;7:897–903.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cosman F, Herrington B, Himmelstein S, Lindsay R. Radiographic absorptiometry: a simple method for determination of bone mass. Osteoporosis Int 1991;2:34–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang OS, Hagiwara S, Engelke K, et al. Radiographic absorptiometry for bone mineral measurement of the phalanges: precision and acurracy study. Radiology 1994;192:857–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Matkovic V. Osteoporosis as a pediatric disease: role of calcium and heredity. J Rheum 1992;19 (Suppl 3):54–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wishart JM, Horowitz M, Bochner M, Need AG, Nordin BEC Relationships between metacarpal morphometry, forearm and 13 vertebral bone density and fractures in postmenopausal women. Br J Radiol 1993;66:435–40.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barnett E, Nordin BE. The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach. Clin Radiol 1960;11:166–74.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Derisquebourg T, Dubois P, Devogelaer JP, Meyes E, Duquesnoy B. Automated computerized radiogrammometry of the second metacarpal and its correlation with absorptiometry of the forearm and spine. Calcif Tissue Int 1994;54:461–5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rico H, Revilla M, Martin FJ, Cardenas JL, Villa LF. Metacarpal cortical thickness by computed radiography in osteoporosis. Bone 1994;15:303–6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Adami S, Kanis JA. Assessment of involutional bone loss: methodological and conceptual problems. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:511–7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kleerkoper M, Nelson DA, Flynn MJ, Pawluszka AS, Jacobsen G, Peterson EL. Comparison of radiographic absorptiometry with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography in normal older white and black women. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:1745–9.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Watts NB, Harris ST, Genant HK, et al. Intermittent cyclical etidronate treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1990;3223:73–9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Adami S, Baroni MC, Broggini M, et al. Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with continuous daily oral alendronate in comparison with either placebo or intranasal salmon calcitonin. Osteoporosis Int 1993; Suppl 3:21–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adami, S., Zamberlan, N., Gatti, D. et al. Computed radiographic absorptiometry and morphometry in the assessment of postmenopausal bone loss. Osteoporosis Int 6, 8–13 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01626531

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01626531

Keywords

Navigation