Skip to main content
Log in

Intra-abdominal pressure measurement using a modified nasogastric tube: Description and validation of a new technique

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study assessed the accuracy of an intragastric method of measuring intra-abdominal pressure (IAP).

Design

Prospective sequential study with simultaneous paired measurement of gastric and urinary bladder pressures.

Setting

Operating theatre, University Teaching Hospital.Patients: 9 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were studied.

Interventions

Intraperitoneal pressures were monitored during peritoneal insufflation at laparoscopy up to a pressure of 20 mmHg.

Measurements and results

Intra-abdominal pressure measurements were recorded simultaneously using a gastric balloon and urinary catheter. Gastric pressure may be up to 4 mmHg higher or 3 mmHg lower than urinary bladder pressure.

Conclusions

Intra-abdominal pressure can be measured easily in this new fashion, allowing a continuous pressure trend to be obtained without interfering with urinary output estimation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Platell CF, Hall J, Clarke G, Lawerence Brown M (1990) Intra-abdominal pressure and renal function after surgery to the abdominal aorta. Aust NZ J Surg 60:213–216

    Google Scholar 

  2. Platell C, Hall J, Dobb G (1990) Impaired renal function due t raised intra-abdominal pressure. Intensive Care Med 16:328–329

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thorington JM, Schmidt CF (1923) A study of urinray output and blood pressure changes resulting in experimental ascites. Am J Med Sci 165:880–890

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bradley SE, Bradley GP (1947) The effect of increased intra-abdominal pressure on renal funcion in man. J Clin Invest 26:1010–1022

    Google Scholar 

  5. Diebel LN, Wilson RF, Dulchavshy SA, Saxe J (1992) Effect on increased intra-abdominal pressure on hepatic arterial, portal venous, and hepatic microcirculatory blood flow. J Trauma 33:279–283

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kron IL, Harman PK, Nolan SP (1984) The measurement on intra-abdominal pressure as a criterion for abdominal re-exploration. Ann Surg 196:594–597

    Google Scholar 

  7. Iberti TJ, Lieber CE, Benjamin E (1989) Determination of intra-abdominal pressure using a transurethral bladder catheter: clinical validation of the technique. Anesthesiology 70:47–50

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fiddian-Green RG (1991) Should measurement of tissue pH and PO2 be included in the routine monitoring of intensive care unit patients? Crit Care Med 19:141–143

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vantrappen G (1982) The migrating myoelectric complex. In: Weinbeck M (ed) Motility of the digestive tract. Raven Press, New York, pp 157–167

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet I:307–309

    Google Scholar 

  11. Celoria G, Steingrub J, Dawson JA, Teres D (1987) Oliguria from high intra-abdominal pressure secondary to ovarian mass. Crit Care Med 15:78–79

    Google Scholar 

  12. Motew M, Ivankovich AD, Bieniarz J, Albrecht RF, Zahed B, Scommegna A (1973) Cardiovascular effects and acid base and blood gas changes during laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 115: 1002–1012

    Google Scholar 

  13. Richards WO, Scovill W, Shin B, Reed W (1982) Acute renal failure associated with increased intra-abdominal pressure. Ann Surg 197:183–187

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sugrue, M., Buist, M.D., Lee, A. et al. Intra-abdominal pressure measurement using a modified nasogastric tube: Description and validation of a new technique. Intensive Care Med 20, 588–590 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01705728

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01705728

Key words

Navigation