Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient RGD-independent entry process of coxsackievirus A9

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Archives of Virology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Previously we showed for coxsackievirus A9 (CAV-9) that specific interactions between the RGD motif of capsid protein VP1 and the αvβ3 integrin are involved in virus binding and entry into green monkey kidney cells (GMK) and some other cell lines. The RGD-recognizing αvβ3 integrin is known as the vitronectin receptor (VNR). During replication in the gut, CAV-9 like all other enteroviruses are exposed to host proteolytic enzymes, and we showed previously that the RGD-containing 15 amino acids long carboxy terminal extension of VP1 is cleaved off by trypsin. The trypsin-treated CAV-9 was still infectious, although at an apparently reduced level as assessed in GMK cells. This indicated that the virus was able to bypass the RGD-dependent entry and possibly use an alternative receptor. We have now found that in RD cells, a human rhabdomyosarcoma cell line, neither RGD-containing oligopeptides nor polyclonal antiserum to VNR are able to protect the cells from CAV-9 infection suggesting that the RGD motif is not involved in binding or entry of the virus into these cells. This result was further confirmed by demonstrating that, in RD cells, the trypsin-treated CAV-9 lacking the RGD-containing insert appeared to be as infectious as the untreated virus. The most striking difference between the virus receptors in the RD and the GMK cells was seen when the rate of virus uncoating was studied. For virus particles bound to the RD cells, the uncoating step started already at 18–20 °C and the process went on rapidly at 36 °C resulting in complete disintegration of cell-bound virions. In contrast, αvβ3-bound virus particles in the GMK cells appeared to uncoat slowly even at 36 °C and during the 90 min observation period only a small, hardly visible fraction was found to be disintegrated. Trypsin-cleaved CAV-9 showed the rapid disintegration kinetics in GMK cells as well suggesting that these cells contain both types of receptor specificity. These results indicate that CAV-9 is able to use two different entry routes into host cells depending on the target cells and on phenotypic properties of the virus regulated by host proteases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abraham G, Colonno RJ (1984) Many rhinovirus serotypes share the same cellular receptor. J Virol 51: 340–345

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bergelson JM, Shepley MP, Chan BMC, Hemler ME, Finberg RW (1992) Identification of the integrin VLA-2 as a receptor for echovirus 1. Science 255: 1718–1720

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bergelson JM, St. John N, Kawaguchi S, Chan M, Stubdal H, Modin J, Finberg RW, (1993) Infection by echovirus 1 and 8 depends on the α2 subunit of human VLA-2. J Virol 67: 6847–6852

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bergelson JM, Chan M, Solomon KR, St. John NF, Lin H, Finberg RW (1994) Decay-accelerating factor (CD 55), a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored complement regulatory protein, is a receptor for several echoviruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 6245–6248

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berinstein A, Roivainen M, Hovi T, Mason PW, Baxt B (1995) Antibodies to the vitronectin receptor (integrin αvβ3) inhibit binding and infection of foot-and-mouth disease virus to cultured cells. J Virol 69: 2664–2666

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chang KH, Auvinen P, Hyypiä T, Stanway G (1989) The nucleotide sequence of coxsackievirus A9; implications for receptor binding and enterovirus classification. J Gen Virol 70: 3269–3280

    Google Scholar 

  7. Colonno R, (1987) Cell surface receptors for picornaviruses. Bio Essays 5: 1434–1437

    Google Scholar 

  8. Greve JM, Davis G, Meyer AM, Forte CP, Yost SC, Marlor CW, Kamarck ME McClelland A (1989) The major human rhinovirus receptor is ICAM-1. Cell 56: 839–847

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hofer F, Gruenberger M, Kowalski H, Machat H, Huetinger M, Kuechler E, Blaas D (1994) Members of the low density lipoprotein receptor family mediate cell entry of a minor-group common cold virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 1839–1842

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hughes PI, Horsnell C, Stanway G (1995) The coxsackievirus A9 RGD motif is not essential for virus viability. J Virol 69: 8035–8040

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hyypiä T, Kallajoki M, Maaronen M, Stanway G, Kandolf R, Auvinen P, Kalimo H (1993) Pathogenetic differences between coxsackie A and B virus infections in newborn mice. Virus Res 27: 71–78

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kronenberger P, Vrijsen R, Boeyé A (1992) Compartmentalization of subviral particles during poliovirus eclipse in HeLa cells. J Gen Virol 73: 1739–1744

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marsh M, Helenius A (1989) Virus entry into animal cells. Adv Virus Res 36: 107–151

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mendelsohn CE, Wimmer E, Racaniello VR (1989) Cellular receptor for poliovirus: molecular cloning, nucleotide sequence, and expression of a new member of the immunoglobulin superfamily. Cell 56: 855–865

    Google Scholar 

  15. Piirainen L, Airaksinen A, Hovi T, Roivainen M (1996) Selective cleavage by trypsin of the capsid protein VP1 of type 3 poliovirus results in improved sorting of cell bound virions. Arch Virol 141: 1011–1020

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pulli T, Koshimies P, Hyypiä T (1995) Molecular comparison of coxsackie A virus serotypes. Virology 212: 30–38

    Google Scholar 

  17. Raab de Verdugo U, Selinka HC, Huber M, Kramer B, Kellermann J, Hofschneider PH, Kandolf R (1995) Characterization of a 100-kilodalton binding protein for the six serotypes of coxsackie B viruses. J Virol 69: 6751–6757

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roivainen M, Hyypiä T, Piirainen L, Kalkkinen N, Stanway G, Hovi T (1991) RGD-dependent entry of coxsackievirus A9 into host cells and its bypass after cleavage of VP1 protein by intestinal proteases. J Virol 65: 4735–4740

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roivainen M, Piirainen L, Hovi T, Virtanen I, Riikonen T, Heino J, Hyypiä T (1994) Entry of coxsackievirus A9 into host cells: specific interactions with αvβ3 integrin, the vitronectin receptor. Virology 203: 357–365

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ward T, Pipkin PA, Clarkson NA, Stone DM, Minor PD, Almond J (1994) Decay-accelerating factor CD55 is identified as the receptor for echovirus 7 using CELICS, a rapid immuno-focal cloning method. EMBO J 13: 5070–5074

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roivainen, M., Piirainen, L. & Hovi, T. Efficient RGD-independent entry process of coxsackievirus A9. Archives of Virology 141, 1909–1919 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718203

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718203

Keywords

Navigation