Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Central venous catheter infections: Concepts and controversies

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are widely used in critically ill patients in intensive care units. However, infectious complications are common and may limit their utility. We critically review the literature to determine the impact of CVC design amd composition, insertion site selection, insertion procedures, care and removal of temporary CVCs on infectious complications. Relevant articles were identified and selected for review using a database search (Medline and manual of the English language literature) based upon study design and sample size with an emphasis on prospective randomized trials. To minimize infectious complications and maintain a reasonable cost-benefit ratio, we recommend: i) use a single lumen catheter unless clear indications for a multi-lumen catheter exist; ii) insert the catheter via the subclavian vein if no relative contraindication exists (bleeding diathesis, positive pressure ventilation); iii) disinfect the insertion site employing sterile technique; iv) apply a dry, sterile dressing and change the dressing every other day; v) inspect the insertion site for signs of infection and remove the catheter if pus is present; vi) if a catheter-related infection is suspected, change the catheter over a guidewire and culture the distal segment. The replacement catheter should be removed if an original catheter segment culture is positive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hampton AA, Sheretz RJ (1988) Vascular access infections in hospitalized patients. Surg Clin North Am 68: 57–71

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maki DG, Band JD (1981) A comparative study of polyantibiotic and iodophor ointments in prevention of vascular catheter-related infection. Am J Med 70:739–744

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP et al (1992) American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med 20: 864–874

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW (1977) A semiquantitative culture method for indentifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med 296: 1305–1309

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cleri DJ, Corrado ML, Seligman SJ (1980) Quantitative culture of intravenous catheters and other intravascular inserts. J Infect Dis 141:781–786

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kelly CS, Ligas JR, Smith CA, Madden GM et al (1986) Sepsis due to triple lumen central venous catheters. Surg Gynecol Obstet 163:14–16

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stillman R, Soliman F, Garcia L, Sawyer P (1977) Etiology of catheter-associated sepsis: correlation with thrombogenicity. Arch Surg 112:1497–1499

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hoshal VL Jr, Ause RG, Hoskins PA (1971) Fibrin sleeve formation on indwelling subclavian central venous catheters. Arch Surg 102:353–358

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fabri PJ, Mortallo JM, Ebbert ML, Kudsk KA et al (1984) Clinical effect of nonthrombotic total parenteral nutrition catheters. JPEN 8:705–707

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kudsk KA, Powell C, Mirtallo JM, Fabri PJ et al (1985) Heparin does not reduce catheter sepsis during total parenteral nutrition. JPEN 9:348–349

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bailey MJ (1979) Reduction of catheter-associated sepsis in parenteral nutrition using low-dose intravenous heparin. BMJ 23:1671–1673

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kamal GD, Pfaller MA, Rempe LE, Jebson PJ (1991) Reduced intravascular catheter infection by antibiotic bonding: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. JAMA 265:2364–2368

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maki DG, Wheeler SJ, Stolz SM, Mermel LA (1991) Clinical trial of a novel antiseptic central venous catheter. The 31st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, September 29-October 2:176 (Abstract)

  14. Pemberton LB, Lyman B, Lander V, Covinsky J (1989) Sepsis from triple- vs single-lumen catheters during total parenteral nutrition in surgical or critically ill patients. Arch Surg 121: 591–594

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hilton E, Haslett T, Borenstein MT, Isenberg JD et al (1988) Central catheter infections: single- versus triple-lumen catheters; influence of guide wires on infection rates when used for replacement of catheters. Am J Med 84:667–672

    Google Scholar 

  16. McCarthy MC, Shives JK, Robison RJ, Broadie RA (1987) Prospective evaluation of single and triple lumen catheters in total parenteral nutrition. JPEN 11:259–262

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miller JJ, Venus B, Mathru M (1984) Comparison of the sterility of long-term central venous catheterization using single lumen, triple lumen, and pulmonary artery catheters. Crit Care Med 12:634–637

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bernard RW, Stahl WM, Chase RM (1971) Subclavian vein catheterizations: a prospective study; II. Infectious complications. Ann Surg 173:191–200

    Google Scholar 

  19. Farkas JC, Liu N, Bleriot JP, Chevret S et al (1992) Single- versus triple-lumen central catheter-related sepsis: a prospective randomized study in a critically ill population. Am J Med 93: 277–282

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pomp A, Stella L, Caldwell D, Albina J (1988) Catheter-related sepsis: single lumen catheters (SLC) vs triple lumen catheters (TLC) JPEN 12:23s (Abstract)

  21. Lee RB, Buckner R, Sharp KW (1988) Do multi-lumen catheters increase central venous catheter sepsis compared to single-lumen catheters? J Trauma 28: 1472–1475

    Google Scholar 

  22. Applefeld JJ, Caruthers TE, Reno DS Civetta JM (1978) Assessment of the sterility of long term cardiac catheterization using the thermodilution Swan-Ganz catheter. Chest 74:377–380

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kaye W, Wheaton M, Potter-Bynoe G (1983) Radial and pulmonary artery catheter-related sepsis. Crit Care Med 11:249–252

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hudson-Civetta JA, Civetta JM, Martinez OV, Hoffman TA (1987) Risk and detection of pulmonary artery catheter-related infection in septic surgical patients. Crit Care Med 15:29–34

    Google Scholar 

  25. Johnston WE, Prough DS, Royster RL, Peacock JE et al (1984) Short-term sterility of the pulmonary artery catheter inserted through an external plastic shield. Anesth 61:461–464

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bach A, Bohrer H, Geiss HK (1992) Safety of a guidewire technique for replacement of pulmonary artery catheters. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 6: 711–714

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kaiser CW, Koornick AR, Smith N, Soroff HS (1981) Choice of route for central venous cannulation: subclavian or internal jugular vein? A prospective randomized study. J Surg Oncol 17: 345–354

    Google Scholar 

  28. Senagore A, Waller JD, Bonnell BW, Bursch LR et al (1987) Pulmonary artery catheterization: a prospective study of internal jugular and subclavian approaches. Crit Care Med 15:35–37

    Google Scholar 

  29. Burr C, Ainefeld EW (1978) The caval catheter. Springer, Berlin, pp 39–65

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sessler CN, Glauser FL (1987) Central venous cannulation done by house officers in the intensive care unit: a prospective study. South Med J 80: 1239–1248

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gil RR, Kruse JA, Thill-Baharozian MC, Carlson RW (1989) Triple- vs single-lumen central venous catheters. Arch Intern Med 149:1139–1143

    Google Scholar 

  32. Collignon P, Soni N, Pearson I, Sorrell T et al (1988) Sepsis associated with central vein catheters in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 14:227–231

    Google Scholar 

  33. Brun-Buisson C, Abrouk F, Legrand P, Huet Y et al (1987) Diagnosis of central venous catheter-related sepsis; critical level of quantitative tip cultures. Arch Intern Med 147:873–877

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pinilla JC, Ross DF, Martin T, Crump H (1983) Study of the incidence of intravascular catheter infection and associated septicemia in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 11:21–25

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bjornson HS, Colley R, Bower RH, Duty VP et al (1982) Association between microorganism growth at the catheter insertion site and colonization of the catheter in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition. Surgery 92:720–727

    Google Scholar 

  36. Snydman DR, Pober BR, Murray SA, Gorbea HF et al (1982) Predictive value of surveillance skin cultures in total-parenteral-nutrition-related infection. Lancet II:1385–1388

    Google Scholar 

  37. Maki DG, Ringer M, Alvarado CJ (1991) Prospective randomized trial of povidone-iodine, alcohol, and chlorhexidine for prevention of infection associated with central venous and arterial catheters. Lancet 338:339–343

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bozzetti F, Terno G, Bonfanti G, Scarpa D et al (1983) Prevention and treatment of central venous catheter sepsis by exchange via a guidewire. Ann Surg 198:48–52

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sitzmann JV, Townsend TR, Siler MC, Bartlett JG (1984) Septic and technical complications of central venous catheterization: a prospective study of 200 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 202: 766–770

    Google Scholar 

  40. Powell CR, Traetow MJ, Fabri PJ, Kudsk KA et al (1985) Op-site dressing study: a prospective randomized study evaluating povidone iodine ointment and extension set changes with 7-day op-site dressings applied to total parenteral nutrition subclavian sites. JPEN 9:443–446

    Google Scholar 

  41. Maki DG, McCormack KN (1987) Defatting catheter insertion sites in total parenteral nutrition is of no value as an infection control measure. Am J Med 83:833–840

    Google Scholar 

  42. Essop AR, Frolich J, Moosa MR, Miller M et al (1984) Risk factors related to bacterial contamination of indwelling vascular catheters in non-infected hosts. Intensive Care Med 10: 193–195

    Google Scholar 

  43. Prager RL, Silva J Jr (1984) Colonization of central venous catheters. South Med J 77:458–461

    Google Scholar 

  44. Armstrong CW, Mayhall CG, Miller KB, Newsome HH Jr et al (1986) Prospective study of catheter replacement and other risk factors for infection of hyperalimentation catheters. J Infect Dis 154:808–816

    Google Scholar 

  45. Conly JM, Grieves K, Peters B (1989) A prospective, randomized study comparing transparent and dry gauze dressings for central venous catheters. J Infect Dis 159:310–319

    Google Scholar 

  46. Maki DG, Cobb L, Garman JK, Shapiro JM et al (1988) An attachable silver-impregnated cuff for prevention of infection with central venous catheters: a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Am J Med 85:307–314

    Google Scholar 

  47. Flowers RHIII, Schwenzer KJ, Kopel RF, Fisch MJ et al (1989) Efficacy of an attachable subcutaneous cuff for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infection. JAMA 261:878–883

    Google Scholar 

  48. Welch GW, McKeel DW, Silverstein P, Walker HL (1974) The role of catheter composition in the development of thrombophlebitis. Ann Intern Med 138: 421–424

    Google Scholar 

  49. Powell C, Regan C, Farri PJ, Ruberg RL (1982) Evaluation of opsite catheter dressings for parenteral nutrition: a prospective, randomized study. JPEN 6:43–46

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ricard P, Martin R, Marcoux JA (1985) Protection of indwelling vascular catheters: incidence of bacterial contamination and catheter-related sepsis. Crit Care Med 13:541–543

    Google Scholar 

  51. McCredie KB, Lawson M, Marts K, Stern J (1984) A comparative evaluation of transparent dressings and gauze dressings for central venous catheters. JPEN 8:96

    Google Scholar 

  52. Hoffmann KK, Weber DJ, Samsa GP, Rutala WA (1992) Transparent polyurethane-film as an intravenous catheter dressing: a meta-analysis of the infection rates. JAMA 267:2072–2076

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hill RL, Fisher AP, Ware RJ, Wilson S et al (1990) Mupirocin for the reduction of colonization of internal jugular cannulae-a randomized controlled trial. J Hosp Infect 15:311–321

    Google Scholar 

  54. Samsoondar W, Freeman JB (1985) Colonization of intravascular monitoring devices. Crit Care Med 13:753–755

    Google Scholar 

  55. Moyer MA, Edwards LD, Farley L (1983) Comparative culture methods on 100 intravenous catheters: routine, semiquantitative, and blood cultures. Arch Intern Med 143:66–69

    Google Scholar 

  56. Weinstein RA, Emori TG, Anderson RL, Stamm WE (1976) Pressure transducers as a source of bacteremia after open heart surgery: report of an outbreak and guidelines for prevention. Chest 69:338–344

    Google Scholar 

  57. Weinstein RA, Stamm WE, Kramer L, Corey L (1976) Pressure monitoring devices: overlooked source of nosocomial infection. JAMA 236:936–938

    Google Scholar 

  58. Buxton AE, Anerson RL, Klimek J, Quintiliani R (1978) Failure of disposable domes to prevent septicemia acquired from contaminated pressure transducers. Chest 74:508–513

    Google Scholar 

  59. Dryden GE; Brickler J (1979) Stopcock contamination. Anesth Analg 58: 141–142

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sitges-Serra A, Puig P, Linares J, Perez JL et al (1984) Hub colonization as the initial step in an outbreak of catheter-related sepsis due to coagulase negative staphylococci during parenteral nutrition. JPEN 8:668–672

    Google Scholar 

  61. Falchuk KH, Peterson L, McNeil BJ (1985) Microparticulate-induced phlebitis: its prevention by in-line filtration. N Engl J Med 312:78–82

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sitges-Serra A, Linares J, Perez JL, Jaurrieta E et al (1985) A randomized trial of the effect of tubing changes on hub contamination and catheter sepsis during parenteral nutrition. JPEN 9:322–325

    Google Scholar 

  63. Band JD, Maki DG (1979) Safety of changing intravenous delivery systems at longer than 24-hour intervals. Ann Intern Med 91:173–178

    Google Scholar 

  64. Gorbea HF, Snydman DR, Delaney A, Stockman J et al (1984) Intravenous tubing with burettes can be safely changed at 48-hour intervals. JAMA 215:2112–2115

    Google Scholar 

  65. Snydman DR, Donnelly-Reidy M, Perry LK, Martin WJ (1987) Intravenous tubing containing burettes can be safely changed at 72 hour intervals. Infect Control 8:113–116

    Google Scholar 

  66. Maki DG, Botticelli JT, LeRoy ML, Thielke TS (1987) Prospective study of replacing administration sets for intravenous therapy at 48- vs 72-hour intervals. JAMA 258:1777–1781

    Google Scholar 

  67. Gertner J, Herman B, Pescio M, Wolff MA (1979) Risk of infection in prolonged central venous catheterization. Surg Gynecol Obstet 149:567–570

    Google Scholar 

  68. Snyder RH, Archer FJ, Endy T, Allen TW et al (1988) Catheter infection: a comparison of two catheter maintenance techniques. Ann Surg 208: 651–653

    Google Scholar 

  69. Cobb DK, High KP, Sawyer RG, Sable CA et al (1992) A controlled trial of scheduled replacement of central venous and pulmonary-artery catheters. N Engl J Med 327:1062–1068

    Google Scholar 

  70. Eyer S, Brummitt C, Carossley K, Siegel R et al (1990) Catheter-related sepsis: prospective, randomized study of three methods of long-term catheter maintenance. Crit Care Med 18: 1073–1079

    Google Scholar 

  71. Newsome HH, Armstrong CW, Mayhall GC, Sugerman HJ et al (1984) Mechanical complications from insertion of subclavian venous feeding catheters: comparison of de novo percutaneous venipuncture to change of catheter over guidewire. JPEN 8: 560–562

    Google Scholar 

  72. Hagley MT, Martin B, Gast P, Traeger SM (1992) Infections and mechanical complications of central venous catheters placed by percutaneous venipuncture and over guidewires. Crit Care Med 20:1426–1430

    Google Scholar 

  73. Pettigrew RA, Lang SDR, Haydock DA, Parry BR et al (1985) Catheter-related sepsis in patients on intravenous nutrition: a prospective study of quantitative catheter cultures and guidewire changes for suspected sepsis. Br J Surg 72:52–55

    Google Scholar 

  74. Cercenado E, Ena J, Rodriguez-Crexems M, Romero I et al (1990) A conservative procedure for the diagnosis of catheter-related infections. Arch Intern Med 150:1417–1420

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Medical College of Virginia, USA

    C. R. Reed, C. N. Sessler, F. L. Glauser & B. A. Phelan

Authors
  1. C. R. Reed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. N. Sessler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. L. Glauser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B. A. Phelan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reed, C.R., Sessler, C.N., Glauser, F.L. et al. Central venous catheter infections: Concepts and controversies. Intensive Care Med 21, 177–183 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01726542

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01726542

Key words

Search

Navigation