Skip to main content
Log in

Intravascular ultrasound imaging for guidance of atherectomy and other plaque removal techniques

  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intravascular ultrasound imaging provides a direct view of atherosclerotic disease, generatingin vivo information about the depth and mechanical characteristics of plaque at any point in the vessel wall. For this reason, ultrasound has significant potential to serve as a guidance modality for catheter-based techniques designed to remove or ablate plaque. Although the current generation mechanical atherectomy, laser ablation and ultrasound pulverization techniques all have some specificity for attacking plaque as opposed to normal vessel wall, it appears that in practice all of these devices will continue to carry a risk of traumatizing or even perforating arteries. In addition, it seems highly likely that aggressive ‘debulking’ of plaque will require some type of guidance beyond angiography — a role which ultrasound is theoretically well suited to play.

The purpose of this review is to consider the theoretical and practical applications of ultrasound imaging as a guide to catheter-based plaque removal and ablation techniques. Specific uses will be discussed with respect to both directional and coaxial therapeutic devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glagov S, Weisneberg E, Zarins CK et al. Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic arteries. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 1371–1375.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Freudenberg H, Lichtler PR. The normal wall segments in coronary stenosis: A postmortal study. Z Kardiol 1981; 79: 863–869.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Simpson JB, Selmon MR, Robertson GC et al. Transluminal atherectomy for occlusive peripheral vascular disease. Am J Cardiol 1988; 61: 96G-101G.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stack RS, Quigley PJ, Sketch MH, Newman GE, Phillipis HR III. Extraction atherectomy. In: Topol EJ, ed, Interventional Cardiology. Philadelphia; WB Saunders Co, 1990; 590–602.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hansen DD, Auth DC, Hall M, Ritchie JL. Rotational endarterectomy in normal canine coronary arteries: preliminary report. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 11: 1073–1077.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nordstrom LA, Casaneda-Zuniger WR, Young EG, Von Seggern KB. Direct organ laser exposure for recanalization of peripheral arteries: Early results. Radiology 1988; 168: 359–364.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sherman CT, Litvack F, Grundfest W et al. Coronary angioscopy in patients with unstable angina pectoris. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 912–919.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ramee SR, White CJ, Collins TJ et al. Percutaneous angioscopy during coronary angioplasty using a steerable microangioscope. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17: 100–105.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leon MB, Lu DY, Prevosti LG et al. Human arterial surface fluorescence: Atherosclerotic plaque identification and effects of laser atheroma ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12: 94–102.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Isner JM, Donaldson BS, Fortin AH, Tischler A, Clarke RH. Attenuation of the media of coronary arteries in advanced atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol 1986; 58: 937–939.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Losordo DW, Chokshi SK, Harding M, Pieczek A. Three-dimensional intravascular ultrasonic imaging of intraarterial stents: Validation of technique by histologic morphology. Circulation 1990; 82 (suppl III): III-103 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kitney RI, Moura L, Straughan K: 3-D visualization of arterial structures using ultrasound and Voxel modelling. Int J Card Imag 1989; 4: 135–143.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garratt KN, Holmes DR, Bell MR et al. Restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy: Difference between primary atheromatous and restenosis lesions and influence of subintimal tissue resection. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 1665–1671.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hinohara T, Rowe MH, Robertson GC et al. Effect of lesion characteristics on outcome of directional coronary atherectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17: 1112–1120.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Backa D, Polnitz AV, Nerlich A, Hofling B. Histologic comparison of atherectomy biopsies from coronary and peripheral arteries. Circulation 1990; 82 (suppl III): III-34 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Simpson JB, Robertson GC, Selmon MH, Sipperly ME, Braden LJ, Hinohara T. Restenosis following successful directional atherectomy. Circulation 1989; 80 (suppl II): II-582 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  17. DeCesare NB, Popma JJ, Whitlow PL, Pinkerton CA, Kereikas DJ, Garrett KN, Ellis SG. Excision beyond the ‘normal’ arterial wall with directional coronary atherectomy — acute and long-term outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17: 384A.

  18. Robertson GC, Rowe MH, Selmon MR, Hinohara T, Vetter JW, Braden LJ, Simpson JB. Directional coronary atherectomy for lesions with complex morphology. Circulation 1990; 82 (suppl III): III-312 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Simpson JB, Rowe MH, Selmon MR, Robertson GC, Vetter JW, Leggett JH, Hinohara T. Restenosis following directional coronary atherectomy in de novo lesions of native coronary arteries. Circulation 1990; 82 (suppl III): III-313 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  20. White NW, Webb JG, Rowe MH, Simpson JB. Atherectomy guidance using intravascular ultrasound: Quantitation of plaque burden. Circulation 1989; 80 (suppl II) II-374 (abstract).

  21. Yock PG, Fitzgerald, Sykes PJ et al. Morphologic features of successful coronary atherectomy determined by intravascular ultrasound imaging. Circulation 1990; 82 (suppl III): III-676 (abstract).

  22. Smucker ML, Scherb DE, Howard PF et al. Intracoronary ultrasound: How much ‘angioplasty effect’ in atherectomy. Circulation 1990; 82 (suppl III): III-676 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sharaf BL, Williams DO. ‘Dotter Effect’ contributes to angiographic improvement following directional coronary atherectomy. Circulation 1990; 82 (suppl III): III-310 (abstract).

  24. Keren G, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Hansch EC, Oblon C, Leon MB, Kent KK. Intravascular ultrasound of coronary atherectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17: 157A (abstract).

  25. Yock PG, Fitzgerald PJ, Jang YT et al. Initial trials of a combined ultrasound/atherectomy catheter. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 78: 17A (abstract).

  26. Aretz HT, Martinelli MA, LeDet EG: Intraluminal ultrasound guidance of transverse laser coronary atherectomy. Int J Card Imaging 1989; 4: 153–157.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Linker DR, Bylock A, Amin AB et al. Catheter ultrasound imaging demonstrates the extent of tissue disruption of excimer laser irradiation of human aorta. Circulation 1989; 80 (suppl II): II-581 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yock PG, Fitzgerald PJ, White N, Linker DT, Angelsen BA. Intravascular ultrasound as a guiding modality for mechanical atherectomy and laser ablation. Echocardiography 1990; 7: 425–431.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Siegel RJ, Fishbein NC, Forrester J et al. Ultrasonic plaque ablation, a new method for recanalization of partially occluded arteries. Circulation 1988; 78: 1443–1448.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rosenschein U, Bernstein JJ, DiSegni E et al. Experimental ultrasonic angioplasty: Disruption of atherosclerotic plaques and thrombiin vitro and arterial recanalizationin vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 15: 711–717.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yock, P.G., Fitzgerald, P.J., Sudhir, K. et al. Intravascular ultrasound imaging for guidance of atherectomy and other plaque removal techniques. Int J Cardiac Imag 6, 179–189 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01797850

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01797850

Key words

Navigation