Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of three quality of life measures in intractable epilepsy

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding how epilepsy affects an individual's quality of life (QOL) requires reliable and valid QOL measures. Analyses of reliability and validity rarely examine measures obtained in the same sample, making comparisons among measures difficult. We report analyses of internal consistency reliability, face, content, construct and criterion validity for the Epilepsy Surgery inventory-55 (ESI-55, a measure based on the SF-36 Health Survey), the Sickness impact Profile (SIP) and the Washington Psychosocial Seizure inventory (WPSI) administered concurrently in the same sample of intractable epilepsy patients. Results generally support the validity of all three measures in assessing the aspects of QOL they were designed to address. The ESI-55 and SIP assess a broad, multidimensional construct of QOL in epilepsy, compared with the more specific focus of the WPSI on psychological and social adjustment. Judged by objective psychometric criteria, the ESI-55 and SIP are preferred over the WPSI in studies of the broad impact of epilepsy on quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taylor DC. Psychiatric and social issues in measuring the input and output of epilepsy surgery. In: Engel J, Jr., ed.Surgical treatment of the epilepsies. New York: Raven Press, 1987: 485–503.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hermann BP. Quality of life in epilepsy.J Epilepsy 1992;5: 153–165.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hermann BP, Whitman S. Neurobiological, psychosocial and pharmacological factors underlying interictal psychopathology in epilepsy.Adv Neurol 1991;55: 439–452.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher RS, Parsonage M, Beaussart M, et al. Epilepsy and driving: an international perspective.Epilepsia 1994;35: 675–684.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Collings JA. Psychosocial well-being and epilepsy: An empirical study.Epilepsia 1990;31: 418–426.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thompson P, Oxley J. Socioeconomic accompaniments of severe epilepsy.Epilepsia 1988;29 (Suppl 1): 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Taylor DC, Falconer MA. Clinical, socio-economic, and psychological changes after temporal lobectomy for epilepsy.Br J Psychiatry 1968;114: 1247–1261.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rausch R, Crandall P. Psychological status related to surgical control of temporal lobe seizures.Epilepsia 1982;23: 191–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Augustine AE, Novelly RA, Mattson RH, et al. Occupational adjustment following neurosurgical treatment of epilepsy.Ann Neurol 1984;15: 68–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bladin PF. Psychosocial difficulties and outcome after temporal lobectomy.Epilepsia 1992;33: 898–907.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Guldvog B, Loyning Y, Hauglie-Hanssen E, Flood S, Bjomaes H. Surgical versus medical treatment for epilepsy. II. Outcome related to social areas.Epilepsia 1991;32: 477–486.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hermannet al This issue

  13. Bergner M. Measurement of health status.Med Care 1985;23: 696–704.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gill T, Feinstein A. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements.JAMA 1994;272: 619–626.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sutherland HJ, Till JE. Opinion polling and decision making: a critical appraisal of quality of life assessment.Qual Life Res 1994;3: 155–162.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life.Med Care 1989;27 (Suppl 3): S217-S232.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ware JE, Brook RH, Davies AR, Lohr KN. Choosing measures in health status for individuals in general populations.Am J Public Health 1981;71: 620–625.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hays RD, Anderson R, Revicki D. Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures.Qual Life Res 1993;2: 441–449.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments.J Chronic Dis 1987;40: 171–178.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vickrey BG, Hays RD, Graber J, Rausch R, Engel J, Jr., Brook RH. A health-related quality of life instrument for patients evaluated for epilepsy surgery.Med Care 1992;30: 299–319.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure.Med Care 1981;19: 787–805.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dodrill CB, Batzel LW, Queisser HR, Temkin NR. An objective method for the assessment of psychological and social problems among epileptics.Epilepsia 1980;21: 123–135.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vickrey BG, Hays RD, Hermann BP, Bladin PF, Batzel LW. Outcomes with respect to quality of life. In: Engel J, Jr., ed.Surgical Treatment of the Epilepsies. 2nd Edn. New York: Raven Press, 1993: 623–635.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Engel J, Jr. Outcome with respect to epileptic seizures. In: Engel J, Jr., ed.Surgical Treatment of the Epilepsies. New York: Raven Press, 1987; 553–572.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dodrill CB, Breyer DN, Diamond MB, Dubinsky BL, Geary BB. Psychosocial problems among adults with epilepsy.Epilepsia 1984;25: 168–175.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dodrill CB, Beier R, Kasparick M, Tacke I, Tacke U, Tan S. Psychosocial problems in adults with epilepsy: comparison of findings from four countries.Epilepsia 1984;25: 176–183.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dodrill CB, Commentary: Psychological evaluation. In: Engel J, Jr., ed.Surgical Treatment of the Epilepsies. New York: Raven Press, 1987; 199–201.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dodrill CB, hermann BP, Rausch R, Chelune GJ, Oxbury S. Neuropsychological testing for assessing prognosis following surgery for epilepsy. In: Engel J, Jr., ed.Surgical Treatment of the Epilepsies. 2nd Edn. New York: Raven Press, 1993; 263–271.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ware JE, Jr., Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B.SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Brook RH, Ware JE, Rogers WH, et al.Conceptualization and measurement of health of adults in the Health Insurance Study. Volume VII: Overview. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation (publication no. R-1987/8-HEW), 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection.Med Care 1990;30: 473–483.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vickrey BG, Hays RD, Spritzer KL. Methodological issues in quality of life assessment for epilepsy surgery. In: Chadwick DW, Baker GA, Jacoby A, eds.Quality of life and quality of care in epilepsy: Update 1993. London: Royal Society of Medicine Services Limited Round Table Series 31, 1993; 27–37.

  33. Bergner L, Hallstrom AP, Bergner M, Eisenberg MS, Cobb LA. Health status of survivors of cardiac arrest and of myocardial infarction controls.Am J Public Health 1985;75: 1321–1323.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Deyo RA, Inui TS, Leninger J, Overman S. Physical and psychosocial function in rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical uses of a self-administered health status instrument.Arch Intern Med 1982;142: 879–882.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hart LG, Evans RW. The functional status of ESRD patients as measured by the Sickness Impact Prolife.J Chronic Dis 1987;40 (Suppl 1): 117S-130S.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rothman ML, Hedrick S, Inui TS. The Sickness Impact Profile as a measure of the health status of noncognitively impaired nursing home residents.Med Care 1989;27 (Suppl.): S167

    Google Scholar 

  37. Follick MJ, Smith TW, Ahern DK. The Sickness Impact Profile: a global measure of disability in chronic low back pain.Pain 1985;21: 67–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. McLean A, Dikmen S, Tempkin N, Wyler AR, Gale JL. Psychosocial functioning at 1 month after head injury.Neurosurgery 1984;14: 393–399.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. McSweeney AJ, Grant I, Heaton RK, Adams KM, Timms RM. Life quality of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Arch Intern Med 1982;142: 4173–4178.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika 1951;16: 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mosier CI. On the reliability of a weighted composite.Psychometrika 1943;8: 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fleiss JL.Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd Edn. New York: Wiley, 1981; 212–236.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Campbell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychol Bull 1959;56: 81–105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hayashi T, Hays RD. A microcomputer program for analyzing multitrait-multimethod matrices.Behav Res Meth Instr Comp 1987;19: 345–348.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Steiger J. Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix.Psychol Bull 1980;2: 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Liang MH, Larson MG, Cullen KE, Schwartz JE. Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research.Arthritis Rheum 1985;28: 542–547.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Graham J.The MMPI: A practical guide. Oxford University Press; New York, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Nunnally J.Psychometric Theory. 2nd Edn. New York: McGraw Hill, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hays RD, Stewart AL. The structure of self-reported health in chronic disease patients.Psychol Assess 1990;2: 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Batzel LW, Dodrill CB. Neuropsychological and emotional correlates of marital status and ability to live independently in individuals with epilepsy.Epilepsia 1984;25: 594–598.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Dikmen S, Morgan SF. Neuropsychological factors related to employability and occupational status in persons with epilepsy.J Nervous Ment Dis 1980;168: 236–240.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Dodrill CB. Number of seizure types in relation to emotional and psychosocial adjustment in epilepsy. In: Porter RJ et al., ed.Advances in epileptology: XVth epilepsy international symposium. New York: Raven Press, 1984; 541–544.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Smith DF, Baker GA, Dewey M, Jacoby A, Chadwick DW. Seizure frequency, patient-perceived seizure severity and the psychosocial consequences of intractable epilepsy.J Epilepsy 1991;9: 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hermann BP, Schwartz MS, Karnes WE, Vahdat P. Psychopathology in epilepsy: relationship of seizure type to age at onset.Epilepsia 1980;21: 15–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Brown SW, McGowan MFL, Reynolds EH. The influence of seizure type and medication on psychiatric symptoms in epileptic patients.Br J Psychiatry 1986;148: 300–304.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Giordani B, Berent S, Sackellares JC, et al. Intelligence test performance of patients with partial and generalized seizures.Epilepsia 1985;26: 37–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Mittan RJ. Fear of seizures. In: Whitman S, Hermann BP, eds.Psychopathology in epilepsy: Social dimensions. New York: Oxford University Press 1986: 90–121.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hermann BP, Wyler AR, Ackerman B, Rosenthal TL. Short-term psychological outcome of anterior temporal lobectomy.J Neurosurg 1989;71: 327–334.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Jacoby A. Epilepsy and the quality of everyday life: findings from a study of people with well-controlled epilepsy.Soc Sci Med 1992;34: 657–666.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Furnham A. Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation.Person Indiv Diff 1986;7: 385–400.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Berzon R, Hays RD, Shumaker SA. International use, application and performance of health-related quality of life instruments.Qual Life Res 1993;2: 367–368.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Vickrey BG, Hays RD, Rausch R, Sutherling WW, Engel J, Jr., Brook RH. Quality of life of epilepsy surgery patients as compared with outpatient with hypertension, diabetes, heart disease and/or depressive symptoms.Epilepsia 1994;35: 597–607.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Tan S. Psychosocial functioning of adult epileptic and MS patients and adult normal controls on the WPSI.J Clin Psychol 1986;42: 528–534.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Comprehensive Epilepsy Program, Department of Neurology, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave., Box 673, 14642, Rochester, NY, USA

    J. T. Langfitt

Authors
  1. J. T. Langfitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langfitt, J.T. Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of three quality of life measures in intractable epilepsy. Qual Life Res 4, 101–114 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01833605

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01833605

Key words

Search

Navigation