Abstract
Acute pyogenic sacroiliac joint infection and osteomyelitis of adjacent bones often present with severe, poorly localized lower back, pelvic or hip pain. Five cases of sacroiliac joint infection or sacroiliac bone osteomyelitis were evaluated by MRI. MRI may be a helpful diagnostic tool to evaluate early changes of infection in the sacroiliac area. It is very sensitive for detecting bone marrow abnormalities; however, it is nonspecific and can not accurately differentiate osteomyelitis from sacroiliitis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tang JSH, Gold RH, Basset LW, Seeger LL (1988) Musculoskeletal infection of the extremities: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 166:205
Unger E, Moldofsky P, Gatenby R, Hartz W, Broder G (1988) Diagnosis of osteomyelitis by MR imaging. AJR 150:605
Beltran J, Noto AM, McGhee RB, Freedy RM, McCalla MS (1987) Infections of the musculoskeletal system: high-field-strength MR imaging. Radiology 164:449
Modic MT, Pflanze W, Feiglin DHI, Belhobek G (1986) Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal infections. Radiol Clin North Am 24:247
Erdman WA, Tamburro F, Jayson HT, Weatherall PT, Ferry KB, Peshock RM (1991) Osteomyelitis: characteristics and pitfalls of diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 180:533
Dangman BC, Hoffer FA, Rand FF, O'Rourke EJ (1992) Osteomyelitis in children: gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 182:743
Siddiqui AR (1985) Nuclear imaging in pediatrics. Year Book, Chicago, pp 229–272
Lewin JS, Rosenfield NS, Hoffer PB, Downing D (1986) Acute osteomyelitis in children: combined Tc-99m and Ga-67 imaging. Radiology 158:795
Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Bock GW, Mitchell DG, Hume EL, Pathria MN, Resnick D (1993) Diagnosis of osteomyelitis: utility of fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 189:251
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haliloglu, M., Kleiman, M.B., Siddiqui, A.R. et al. Osteomyelitis and pyogenic infection of the sacroiliac joint. Pediatr Radiol 24, 333–335 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02012119
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02012119