Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical factors for successful cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer

  • Clinical Assisted Reproduction
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To study how clinical factors such as embryo quality, cell stage of embryo at cryopreservation, and synchronization of developmental stages between embryo and endometrium at thawing affect the implantation rate after cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer (ET), these factors were examined in 106 cryopreserved-thawed ETs including 204 embryos.

Results: In 86 embryos graded as high quality before transfer by morphological evaluation, 31 implantations were successful, while the other, low-quality embryos did not implant at all. High-quality embryos received less cryoinjury during cryopreservation compared to the injuries sustained by embryos in moderate and poor quality. When cyopreservation was performed at the 1-, 2-, and 3-day cell stages, pregnancies were similarly achieved among most of the embryos at all cell stages. At thawed ETs in natural ovulation cycles, there were some differences among the developmental stages between thawed embryo and endometrium that received the thawed transferred embryos. Although the transfer timelag ranged a day or more, asynchronism of endometrium growth to the cell stage did not reduce pregnancy rates.

Conclusions: These results indicated that embryo quality evaluated morphologically was the most important clinical factor for successful implantation of cryopreserved-thawed ET.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paulson R J, Sauer M V, Lobo R A: Embryo implantation after human in vitro fertilization: Importance of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 1990;53:870–874

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Garcia J E: Conceptus transfer.In In Vitro Fertilization—Norfolk, H W Jones Jr, G S Jones, G D Hodgen, Z Rosenwaks (eds). Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1986, pp 215–220

    Google Scholar 

  3. Claman P, Armant D R, Seibel M M, Wang T, Oskowitz S P, Taymor M L: The impact of embryo quality and quantity on implantation and the establishment of viable pregnancies. J Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer 1987;4:218–222

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balen A H, MacDougall J, Tan S-L: The influence of the number of embryos transferred in 1060 in-vitro fertilization pregnancies on miscarriage rates and pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1324–1328

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hughes E G, King C, Wood E C: A prospective study of prognostic factors in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1989;51:838–844

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Friedler S, Giudice L C, Lamb E J: Cryopreservation of embryos and ova. Fertil Steril 1988;49:743–764

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nakamura K, Osawa M, Kondo I, Inagaki S, Shibata K, Narita O, Suganuma N, Tomoda Y: Menotropin stimulation after prolonged gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist pretreatment for in vitro fertilization in patients with endometriosis. J Assist Reprod Genet 1992;9:113–117

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Inagaki S, Suganuma N, Kitagawa T, Fukugaki H, Nakamura K, Kondo I, Tomoda Y: Development of an effective and simple insemination method for the in vitro fertilization of patients with male-factor infertility. Asia-Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;20:375–382

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fukugaki H, Suganuma N, Kitagawa T, Yamamoto M, Hibi H, Miyake K, Tomoda Y: Successful in vitro fertilization and pregnancy by the micromanipulation with epididymal sperm. J Assist Reprod Genet 1994;11:452–458

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Testart J, Lassalle B, Belaisch-Allart J, Forman R, Rainhorn JD, Frydman R: High pregnancy rate after early human embryo freezing. Fertil Steril 1986;46:268–272

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kondo I, Suganuma N: Embryo quality in failed in vitro fertilization patients. Assist Reprod Rev 1994;4:80–84

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cummins J M, Breen T M, Harrison K L, Shaw J M, Wilson L M, Hennessey J F: A formula for scoring human embryo growth rates in in vitro fertilization: Its value in predicting pregnancy and in comparison with visual estimates of embryo quality. J Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer 1986;3:284–295

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen J, Inge K L, Suzman M, Wiker S R, Wright G: Videocinematography of fresh and cryopreserved embryos: A retrospective analysis of embryonic morphology and implantation. Fertil Steril 1989;51:820–827

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Trounson A, Sathananthan A H: The application of electron microscopy in the evaluation of two to four cell human embryos cultured in vitro for embryo transfer. J Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer 1984;1:153–165

    Google Scholar 

  15. Punjabi U, Vereecken A, Delbeke L, Angle M, Gielis M, Gerris J, Johnston J, Buytaert P H: Embryo-derived platelet activating factor, a marker of embryo quality and viability following ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. J Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer 1990;7:321–326

    Google Scholar 

  16. Testart J, Lassalle B, Forman R, Gazengel A, Belaisch-Allart J, Hazout A, Rainhorn J-D, Frydman R: Factors influencing the success rate of human embryo freezing in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril 1987;48:107–112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bolton V N, Hawes S M, Taylor C T, Parsons J H: Development of spare human preimplantation embryos in vitro: An analysis of the correlations among gross morphology, cleavage rates, and development to the blastocyst. J Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer 1989;6:30–35

    Google Scholar 

  18. Testart J, Volante M, Lassalle B, Gazengel A, Belaisch-Allart J, Hazout A, de Ziegler D, Frydman R: Comparison of cryoprotectants and stages of human embryos.In Advances in Assisted Reproductive Technologies, S Mashiash, Z Ben-Rafael, N Laufer, J G Schenker (eds). New York, Plenum Press, 1990, pp 573–587

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bergh PA, Navot D: The impact of embryonic development and endometrial maturity on the timing of implantation. Fertil Steril 1992;58:537–542

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Harper M J K: The implantation window. Bailliere's Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1992;6:351–371

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jones M A, Cao Z-D, Anderson W, Norris C, Harper M J K: Capillary permeability changes in the uteri of recipient rabbits after transfer of blastocysts from indomethacin-treated donors. J Reprod Fertil 1986;78:261–273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Milligan S R, Mirembe F M: Time course of the changes in uterine vascular permeability associated with the development of the decidual cell reaction in ovariectomized steroid-treated rats. J Reprod Fertil 1984;70:1–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mandelbaum J, Junca A M, Plachot M: The implantation window in humans after fresh or frozen-thawed embryo transfers.In Advances in Assisted Reproductive Technologies, S Mashiash, Z Ben-Rafael, N Laufer, J G Schenker (eds). New York, Plenum Press, 1990, pp 729–735

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kondo, I., Suganuma, N., Ando, T. et al. Clinical factors for successful cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 13, 201–206 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02065936

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02065936

Key words

Navigation