Skip to main content
Log in

A scale for measuring propensity for abusiveness

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A brief self-report scale is described that assesses propensity for male abusiveness of a female partner in intimate relationships. The scale items are nonreactive, containing no explicit reference to abusive behavior. The scale has good psychometric properties, with a Cronbach's alpha of .91 and three distinct factors. The scale was validated against reports of abuse victimization by mens'’ female partners using the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory (Tolman, 1988). The scale correlated .51 with women's reports of male Domination/Isolation tactics and .47 with Emotional Abuse scale scores. A discriminant function for high vs. low abusiveness indicated that the Propensity for Abusiveness Scale (PAS) correctly classified 82.2% of men into high (one standard deviation above the mean) or low abusiveness (one standard deviation below) abusiveness. Social desirability corrections do not significantly alter the pattern of correlations of the PAS with criterion variables. A cross-validation of the scale supported the initial results. The scale also correlates significantly with physical abuse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arias, I., and Beach, S. R. (1987). Validity of self-reports of marital violence.J. Fam. Viol. 2(2): 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, K., and Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four category model.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 61(2): 226–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briere, J., and Runtz, M. (1989). The Trauma Symptom Checklist (TSC-33): Early data on a new scale.J. Interpers. Viol. 4(2): 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, J. J., and Dutton, D. G. (1986). Assessment of wife assault with the Conflict Tactics Scale: Using couple data to quantify the differential reporting effect.J. Marr. Fam. 48: 375–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Check, J., and Malamuth, N. (1985).The Hostility Toward Women Scale, Paper presented at the International Society for Research on Aggression, Victoria, B.C.

  • Choca, J. P., Shanley, L. A., and Van Denburg, E. (1992).Interpretative Guide to the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory, APA Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, N. L., and Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models and relationship quality in dating couples.J. Personal. Social Psychology 58: 644–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., and Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.J. Consult. Psychol. 24: 349–354.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G. (1995a). Behavioral and affective correlates of Borderline Personality Organization in wife assaulters.Int. J. Law Psychiatry 17(3): 265–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G. (1995b). Trauma symptoms and PTSD profiles in perpetrators of intimate abuse.J. Traum. Stress 8(2): 299–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G. (1995c). The origin and structure of the abusive personality.J. Personal. Dis. 8(3): 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G. (1993). William Head Project: Research Report #1, Correction Service of Canada, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G., and Hemphill, K. J. (1992). Patterns of socially desirable responding among perpetrators and victims of wife assault.Viol. Vict. 7(1): 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G., Starzomski, A., and Ryan, L. (1994).Antecedents of abusive personality and abusive behavior in wife assaulters, Unpublished Manuscript (under review). Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia.

  • Dutton, D. G., and Starzomski, A. J. (1995a). Psychological differences in court vs. self referred wife assaulters.Crim. Just. Behav. 21(2): 203–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G, and Starzomski, A. J. (1995b). Borderline personality in perpetrators of psychological and physical abuse.Viol. Vict. In press.

  • Dutton, D. G., Saunders, K., Starzomski, A., and Bartholomew, K. (1995). Intimacy-anger and insecure attachment as precursors of abuse in intimate relationships.J. Appl. Social Psychol. In press.

  • Gerslma, C., Emmelkamp, P. M. G., and Arrindell, W. A. (1990). Anxiety, depression and perception of early parenting: A meta-analysis.Clin. Psychol. Rev. 10: 251–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D., and Bartholomew, K. (1992).Testing a Two Dimensional Model of Adult Attachment: A Latent Variable Approach, Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo.

  • Gunderson, J. G. (1984).Borderline Personality Disorder, American Psychiatric Press, Inc., Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, C., and Shaver, P. R. (1987). Conceptualizing romantic love as an attachment process.J. Personal Social Psychol. 52: 511–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, L. (1992). Development of the severity of violence against women scales.J. Fam. Viol. 7(2): 103–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon, T. (1981).Disorders of Personality, DSM-III: Axis II, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon, T. (1987).Manual for the Manual for the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-II, National Computer Systems, Minneapolis, Minn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, J., Clarkin, J., Appelbaum, A., Carr, A., Kernberg, P., Lotterman, A., and Haas, G. (1985). A self-report instrument for Borderline Personality Organization. In McGlashan, T. H. (ed.),The Borderline: Current Empirical Research, The Progress in Psychiatry Series, American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC., pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perris, C., Jacobsson, L., Lindstrom, H., von Knorring, L., and Penis, H. (1980). Development of a new inventory for assessing memories of parental rearing behavior.Acta Psychiat. Scand. 61: 265–274.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 46: 598–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. W., Campbell, R. L., and Clatyer, J. R. (1982). New inventory of measurement of parental rearing patterns: An English form of the EMBU.Acta Psychiat. Scand. 66: 499–507.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. (1991). Procedures for adjusting self-reports of violence for social desirability bias.J. Interpers. Viol. 6(3): 336–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J. M. (1986). The multidimensional anger inventory.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 51(1): 191–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring family conflict and violence: The conflict tactics scale.J. Marr. Fam. 41: 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners.Viol. Vict. 4(3): 159–177.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dutton, D.G. A scale for measuring propensity for abusiveness. J Fam Viol 10, 203–221 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110600

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110600

Key words

Navigation