Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Serum progesterone concentrations on the day after human chorionic gonadotropin administration and progesterone/oocyte ratios predict in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer outcome

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue-pretreated in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles, pregnancy rates are inversely related to serum progesterone levels on the day of administration of human chorionic gonadotropin. The relationship of the progesterone concentration on other days in the periovulatory period to pregnancy rates in such cycles is little studied. We therefore retrospectively analyzed the relationship between progesterone concentrations on the day after human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy in 114 cycles, 28 and 23 of which produced clinical and ongoing/delivered pregnancies, respectively. To assess the effect of the extent of follicular luteinization on success, we also studied the relationship between the progesterone concentration per oocyte retrieved and pregnancy for the day of and day after human chorionic gonadotropin.

Results

Progesterone concentrations on the day after human chorionic gonadotropin were inversely associated with clinical pregnancy by multiple logistic regression analysis (P<0.05). Progesterone/oocyte ratios were inversely associated with clinical pregnancy (P<0.05) and ongoing/delivered pregnancy (P<0.02) for both the day of and the day after human chorionic gonadotropin.

Conclusion

The study results extend the window of time during which elevated progesterone concentration is associated with poor outcome to at least 2 days. This finding is consistent with hypothetical mechanisms attributing the link between progesterone concentration and outcome to either endometrial or follicle/oocyte events. The association of lack of follicular luteinization (low progesterone per oocyte ratios) and favorable outcome suggests a predominant effect of progesterone on follicle/oocyte quality. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms underlying the association between progesterone and in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hamori M, Stuckensen JA, Rumpf D, Kniewald T, Kniewald A, Kurz CS: Premature luteinization of follicles during ovarian stimulation ofin vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1987;2:639–643

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kagawa T, Yamano S, Nishida S, Murayama S, Aono T: Relationship among serum levels of luteinizing hormone, estradiol, and progesterone during follicle stimulation and results ofin vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). J Assist Reprod Genet 1992;9:106–112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mio Y, Sekijima A, Iwabe T, Onohara Y, Harada T, Terakawa N: Subtle rise in serum progesterone during the follicular phase as a predictor of the outcome ofin vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1992;58:159–166

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schoolcraft W, Sinton E, Schlenker T, Huynh D, Hamilton F, Meldrum D: Lower pregnancy rate with premature luteinization during pituitary suppression with leuprolide acetate. Fertil Steril 1991;55:563–566

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Silverberg KM, Burns WN, Olive DL, Riehl RM, Schenken RS: Serum progesterone levels predict success ofin vitro fertilization/embryo transfer in patients stimulated with leuprolide acetate and human menopausal gonadotropins. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1991;73:797–803

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Abbasi R, Kubovcik M, DiMattina M: Hormonal parameters associated with poor pregnancy outcome in patients with elevated progesterone levels undergoing hyperstimulation with leuprolide acetate (LA) and human menopausal gonadotropins (hMG) for GIFT/IVF cycles. Fertil Steril 1990;54(Suppl 1):abstrP-114, S112-S113

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fanchin R, de Ziegler D, Taieb J, Hazout A, Frydman R: Premature elevation of plasma progesterone alters pregnancy rates ofin vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1993;59:1090–1094

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Check JH, Choe J, Nowroozi K, Hoover L: The influence of the serum progesterone level at the time of hCG on subsequent pregnancy rates fromin vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Fertil Steril 1992;58(Suppl 1):abstr P-056, S136-S137

    Google Scholar 

  9. Medical Research International, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART), The American Fertility Society:In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in the United States: 1990 results from the IVF-ET registry. Fertil Steril 1992;57:15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hassiakos D, Toner JP, Muasher SJ, Jones Jr HW: Implantation and pregnancy rates in relation to oestradiol and progesterone profiles in cycles with and without the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist suppression. Hum Reprod 1990;5:1004–1008

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Trounson A, Howlett D, Rogers P, Hoppen H-O: The effect of progesterone supplementation around the time of oocyte recovery in patients superovulated forin vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1986;45:532–535

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Garcia JE, Acosta AA, Hsiu J-G, Jones HW Jr: Advanced endometrial maturation after ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotropin/human chorionic gonadotropin forin vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1984;41:31–35

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Forman RG, Eychenne B, Nessmann C, Frydman R, Robel P: Assessing the early luteal phase inin vitro fertilization cycles: Relationships between plasma steroids, endometrial receptors, and endometrial histology. Fertil Steril 1989;51:310–316

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sharma V, Whitehead M, Mason B, Pryse-Davies J, Ryder T, Dowsett M, Campbell S, Collins W: Influence of superovulation on endometrial and embryonic development. Fertil Steril 1990;53:822–829

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bergh PA, Drews M, Masuku S, Hofmann GE, Birkenfeld A, Navot D: Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation may result in profound stromal advancement and is linked to subtle, premature luteinization. Fertil Steril 1991;56(Suppl 1):abstr P-102, S150

    Google Scholar 

  16. Forrest TS, Elyaderani MK, Muilenberg MI, Bewtra C, Kable W, Sullivan P: Cyclic endometrial changes: US assessment with histologic correlation. Radiology 1988;167:233–237

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sakamoto C, Yoshimitsu K, Nakamura G, Ootsuka H, Yoshida K: Sonographic study of the endometrial responses to ovarian hormones in patients receiving ovarian stimulation. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1988;27:407–414

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grunfeld L, Walker B, Bergh PA, Sandler B, Hofmann G, Navot D: High-resolution endovaginal ultrasonography of the endometrium: A noninvasive test for endometrial adequacy. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:200–204

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Welker BG, Gembruch U, Diedrich K, Al-Hasani S, Krebs D: Transvaginal sonography of the endometrium during ovum pickup in stimulated cycles forin vitro fertilization. J Ultrasound Med 1989;8:549–553

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gonen Y, Casper RF: Prediction of implantation by the sonographic appearance of the endometrium during controlled ovarian stimulation forin vitro fertilization (IVF-ET). J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1990;7:146–152

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sher G, Herbert C, Maassarani G, Jacobs MH: Assessment of the late proliferative phase endometrium by ultrasonography in patients undergoingin vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Hum Reprod 1991;6:232–237

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ueno J, Oehninger S, Brzyski RG, Acosta AA, Philput CB, Muasher SJ: Ultrasonographic appearance of the endometrium in natural and stimulatedin vitro fertilization cycles and its correlation with outcome. Hum Reprod 1991;6:901–904

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fleischer AC, Herbert CM, Hill GA, Kepple DM, Worrell JA: Transvaginal sonography of the endometrium during induced cycles. J Ultrasound Med 1991;10:93–95

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Check JH, Nowroozi K, Choe J, Dietterich C: Influence of endometrial thickness and echo patterns on pregnancy rates duringin vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1991;56:1173–1175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dickey RP, Olar TT, Curole DN, Taylor SN, Rye PH: Endometrial pattern and thickness associated with pregnancy outcome after assisted reproduction technologies. Hum Reprod 1992;7:418–421

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Khalifa E, Brzyski RG, Oehninger S, Acosta AA, Muasher SJ: Sonographic appearance of the endometrium: The predictive value for the outcome ofin vitro fertilization in stimulated cycles. Hum Reprod 1992;7:677–680

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Howles CM, Macnamee MC, Edwards RG: The effect of progesterone supplementation prior to the induction of ovulation in women treated forin vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1987;2:91–94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Howles CM, Macnamee MC, Edwards RG: Progesterone supplementation in the late follicular phase of anin vitro fertilization cycle: A “natural” way to time oocyte recovery? Hum Reprod 1988;3:409–412

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Macnamee MC, Edwards RG, Howles CM: The influence of stimulation regimes and luteal phase support on the outcome of IVF. Hum Reprod 1988;3(Suppl 2):43–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mahadevan MM, Fleetham J, Taylor PJ: Effects of progesterone on luteinizing hormone release and estradiol/progesterone ratio in the luteal phase of women superovulated forin vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1988;50:935–937

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ben-Nun I, Ghetler Y, Jaffe R, Siegal A, Kaneti H, Fejgin M: Effect of preovulatory progesterone administration on the endometrial maturation and implantation rate afterin vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1990;53:276–281

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Navot D, Bergh PA, Williams M, Garrisi GJ, Guzman I, Sandler B, Fox J, Schreiner-Engel P, Hofmann GE, Grunfeld L: An insight into early reproductive processes through thein vivo model of ovum donation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1991;72:408–414

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bergh PA, Navot D: The impact of embryonic development and endometrial maturity on the timing of implantation. Fertil Steril 1992;58:537–542

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tarlatzis BC, Laufer N, DeCherney AH, Polan ML, Haseltine FP, Behrman HR: Adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate levels in human follicular fluid: Relationship to oocyte maturation and achievement of pregnancy afterin vitro fertilization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1985;60:1111–1115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Burns WN, Rao TR, Olive DL, Jacobs JD, Riehl RM, Schenken RS: Immediately preovulatory levels of messenger ribonucleic acid for inhibin alpha-subunit are diminished in granulosa cells from successfulin vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1991;6:351–355

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Penzias AS, Shamma FN, Gutmann JN, Seifer DB, DeCherney AH, Lavy G: Luteinizing response to human chorionic gonadotropin does not predict outcome in gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist-suppressed/human menopausal gonadotropin-stimulatedin vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 1992;9:244–247

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, 78284-7836, San Antonio, Texas

    William N. Burns, Craig A. Witz, Nancy A. Klein, Kaylen M. Silverberg & Robert S. Schenken

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, 98195, Seattle, Washington

    Nancy A. Klein

Authors
  1. William N. Burns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Craig A. Witz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nancy A. Klein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kaylen M. Silverberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Robert S. Schenken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burns, W.N., Witz, C.A., Klein, N.A. et al. Serum progesterone concentrations on the day after human chorionic gonadotropin administration and progesterone/oocyte ratios predict in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 11, 17–23 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213692

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213692

Key words

Search

Navigation