Summary
Eighty out-patients (50 F, 30 M), aged 58±12 years (range: 26–84) and weighing 72±10 kg (range: 50–97), presenting with an acute or subacute (<3 months) episode of rotator cuff tendinitis without (n=28) or with movement restriction (n=52) of the shoulder and having a pain intensity of at least 4 on VAS for pain at rest or on active movement, were treated at random and in double blind conditions for 1 to 4 weeks with 1 weekly periarticular anterior injection of tenoxicam 20 mg or placebo. Tenoxicam treated patients improved more than placebo-injected patients in a statistically highly significant manner with regard to clinical index, pain on VAS during active movement and at rest, active mobility (degrees), pain or pressure and clinical global impression (assessed by investigator and patient). There was a nonsignificant opinion that placebo treated patients consumed more rescue medication. Safety assessments were not significantly better in the placebo-treated patients through local tolerability tended to be better in that group. These results indicate that tenoxicam 20 mg injected locally is effective in alleviating pain and in improving shoulder mobility in patients with a painful shoulder episode and suggest that such a treatment is safe and well tolerated. Local injection of tenoxicam seems to be a promising new treatment of acute, painful, local inflammatory processes in Rheumatology, Orthopaedics, Physical Medicine and Sports Medicine. Further studies in other pathologies are warranted.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Famaey, J.P., Crielaard, J.M. Nonclassical injections of NSAIDs: 1. Intraarticular injections. In: Therapeutic Applications of NSAIDs, Subpopulations and New Formulations, Eds: Famaey, J.P., Paulus, H.E., New York: Dekker, 1992, 425–429.
Withrington, R.H., Girgis, F.L., Seifert, M.H. A placebocontrolled trial of steroid injections in the treatment of rotator cuff tendonitis. Scand J Rheumatol 1985, 14, 76–78.
Owen, D.S. Aspiration and injection of joints and soft tissues. In: Textbook of Rheumatology, Eds.: Kelly, Harris, Ruddy & Sledge, Philadelphia: Saunders, 1985, 546–560.
Price, R., Sinclair, H., Heinrich, I., Gibson, T. Local injection treatment of tennis elbow — hydrocortisone, triamcinolone and lignocaine compared. Br J Rheumatol 1991, 30, 39–44.
Mahieu, E., Guillou, G.B. A critical viewpoint on intraarticular corticotherapy in the drug treatment of osteoarthritis. Rev Esp Reumatol 1993, 20 (suppl 1), 326 (abstract).
White, R.H., Paull, D.M., Fleming, K.W. Rotator Cuff Tendonitis: Comparison of subacromial injection of a long acting corticosteroid versus oral indomethacin therapy. J Rheumatol 1986, 13, 608–613.
Petri, M., Dobrow, R., Neiman, R., Whiting-O'Keefe, Q., Seaman, W.E. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the treatment of the painful shoulder. Arthritis Rheum 1987, 30, 1040–1045.
Mardjuadi, A., Dequeker, J. Double-blind trial comparing bufexamac infiltrations with triamcinolone acetonide infiltrations in patients with periarthritis of the shoulder. Curr Med Res Opin 1978, 5, 401–405.
Gatter, R.A. Arthrocentesis technique and intrasynovial therapy. In: Arthritis and Allied Conditions, Ed: McCarthy, D.J., Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1989, 646–656.
Wouters, M. Post-marketing surveillance trial on the efficacy and safety of repetitive IM administration of tenoxicam in the ambulatory treatment of acute sciatica. Rev Esp Reumatol 1993, 20 (suppl 1), 416 (abstract).
Jeunet, F., Enz, W., Guentert, T. Tenoxicam used as parenteral formulation for acute pain in rheumatic conditions. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl 1989, 80, 59–61.
Bird, H. Intraarticular and intralesional therapy. In “Rheumatology”, Eds.: J.H. Klippel and P. Dieppe 1994, 8, 16.116.6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Itzkowitch, D., Ginsberg, F., Leon, M. et al. Peri-articular injection of tenoxicam for painful shoulders: A double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Clin Rheumatol 15, 604–609 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02238552
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02238552