Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the sensitivity of bioimpedance to volume changes in body water

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The sensitivity of whole-body electrical impedance measurements to changes in the volume of total body water in 12 children undergoing haemodialysis has been assessed. The impedance (I) of each child was measured at 20-min intervals during dialysis using the standard four-electrode technique to apply a constant current (800 μA, 50 kHz) between the wrist and ankle on the nonfistula side of the patient. The ultrafiltration volume (U) was also recorded. A simple electrical model suggests that U = aHt2 ((1I0)-(1/I)), where lo is the whole body impedance at the start of dialysis, a is a constant and Ht is patient height. No significant changes in I were measured on 4 patients undergoing dialysis without ultrafiltration, whereas in 8 patients undergoing ultrafiltration and dialysis I increased. Linear regression analysis and the above equation gave a mean value for a = 0.566 1 Ohm/cm2 (coefficient of variation = 3%), (meanr = 0.97), values comparable to those values obtained from isotope dilution studies. Predicted fluid loss in 8 patients following a single dialysis session gave a mean overestimate of 4.3% (limits of agreement 27.3% and −19.7%), although in 6 of the patients agreement was to within 6%. Changes in impedance reflect changes in total body water in children undergoing haemodialysis and are relatively insensitive to factors such as the possible differences in electrolyte levels between these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoffer EC, Meador CK, Simpson DC (1969) Correlation of whole body impedance with total body water volume. J Appl Physiol 27: 531–534

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kushner RF, Schoeller DA (1986) Estimation of total body water by bioelectrical impedance analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 44: 417–424

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lukaski HC, Bolonchuck WW, Hall CB, Siders WA (1986) Validation of tetrapolar bioelectrical impedance method to assess human body composition. J Appl Physiol 60: 1327–1332

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davies PSW, Preece MA, Hicks CJ, Halliday D (1988) The prediction of total body water using bioelectrical impedance in children and adolescents. Ann Hum Biol 15: 237–240

    Google Scholar 

  5. Azcue M, Freid M, Pencharz PB (1993) Use of bioelectrical impedance analysis to measure total body water in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 16: 440–445

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gregory JW Greene SA, Scrimgeour CM, Rennie MJ (1991) Body water measurement in growth disorders: a comparison of bioelectrical impedance and skinfold thickness techniques with isotope dilution. Arch Dis Child 66: 220–222

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kouw PM, Olthof CG, TerWee PM, Oe LP, Donker AJH, Schneider H, de Vries PMJM (1992) Assessment of post-dialysis dry weight: an application of the conductivity measurement method. Kidney Int 41: 440–444

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kurtin PS, Shapiro AC, Tomita H, Raizman D (1990) Volume status and body composition of chronic dialysis patients: utility of bioelectrical impedance plethysmography. Am J Nephrol 10: 363–367

    Google Scholar 

  9. Olthof CG, de Vries PMJM, Kouw PM, Oe PL, Schneider H, deLange JJ, Donker AJM (1993) Non-invasive conductivity method for detection of dynamic body fluid changes: in vitro and in vivo validation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 8: 41–46

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jebb SA, Elia M (1991) Assessment of changes in total body water in patients undergoing renal dialysis using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Clin Nutr 16: 81–84

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bland JM (1987) An introduction to medical statistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 188–215

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1: 307–310

    Google Scholar 

  13. McAdams ET, Jossinet J (1991) The importance of electrode skin impedance in high resolution electrocardiography. Automedica 13: 187–208

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smye SW, Norwood HM, Buur T, Bradbury M, Brocklebank JT (1994) Comparison of extracellular fluid volume measurement in children by99Tcm-DTPA clearance and multifrequency impedance techniques. Physiol Meas 15: 251–260

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smye SW, Sutcliffe J, Pitt E (1993) A comparison of four commercial systems to measure whole body electrical impedance. Physiol Meas 14: 473–478

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kong CH, Thompson CM, Lewis CA, Hill PD, Thompson FD (1993) Determination of total body water in uraemic patients by bioelectrical impedance. Nephrol Dial Transplant 8: 716–719

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bradbury, M.G., Smye, S.W. & Brocklebank, J.T. Assessment of the sensitivity of bioimpedance to volume changes in body water. Pediatr Nephrol 9, 337–340 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02254204

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02254204

Key words

Navigation