Skip to main content
Log in

Bone density of the radius, spine, and hip in relation to percent of ideal body weight in postmenopausal women

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine (L2–L4) and hip (at femoral neck, Ward's triangle, and greater trochanter sites) were determined by dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA), and of the radius by single-photon absorptiometry (SPA) in healthy postmenopausal women aged 40–70 years. The relationships of BMC and BMD to years since menopause were examined separately in 97 women who were above 115% of ideal body weight (IBW) and in 128 women below. The heavier women had significantly greater mean BMC and BMD at each site than did the normal-weight women. In the normal-weight women, there was a significant negative correlation between BMD and years since menopause at each measurement site except the greater trochanter. In the obese women, BMD decreased with increasing years since menopause at the radius site only and BMC declined with increasing years after menopause at the hip (femoral neck and Ward's triangle region) as well as the radius. Thus, body size is a significant determinant of BMD in this population. The pattern of loss of BMD from Ward's triangle and femoral neck regions of hip are similar to that of the spine. The BMC and BMD findings in the hip suggest that remodeling occurs at this weight-bearing site which has a favorable effect on bone strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Daniell HW (1976) Osteoporosis of the slender smoker. Arch Intern Med 136:298–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Seeman E, Melton LJ, O'Fallon WM, Riggs BL (1983) Risk factors for spinal osteoporosis in men. Am J Med 75:977–983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yano K, Wasnich RD, Vogel JM, Heibrun LK (1984) Bone mineral measurements among middle-aged and elderly Japanese residents in Hawaii. Am J Epidemol 119:751–764

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Seeman E, Offord KP, Dunn KL, Mazess RB, Johnson KA, Melton LJ (1981) Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging. Differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndrome. J Clin Invest 70:716–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aubrey BJ, Jacobsen PC, Grubb SA, McCartney WH, Vincent LM, Talmage RV (1984) Bone density in women: a modified procedure for measurement of distal radial density. J Orthop Res 2:314–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Russell RM, McGandy R, Jelliffe D (1984) Reference weights: practical considerations. Am J Med 76:767–769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Peppler WW, Mazess RB (1981) Total body bone mineral and lean body mass by dual-photon absorptiometry I. Theory and measurement procedure. Calcif Tissue Int 33:353–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Mazess RB, Towsley M, Lindsay R, Markhard L, Dempster D (1985) Dual-photon Gd-153 absorptiometry of bone. Radiol 156:203–206

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gotfredsen A, Borg J, Christiansen C, Mazess RB (1984) Total body bone mineral in vivo by dual photon absorptiometry II. Accuracy. Clin Physiol 4:357–362

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dunn WL, Wahner HW, Riggs BL (1980) Measurement of bone mineral content in human vertebrae and hip by dual photon absorptiometry. Radiology 136:485–487

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hanson JA, Mazess RB, Barden H (1986) Influence of source activity on dual-photon scans. J Bone Miner Res 1:281 [abstract]

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cameron JR, Sorenson J (1963) Measurement of bone mineral in vivo: an improved method. Science 142:230–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nilas L, Gotfredsen A, Christiansen C (1986) Total and local bone mass before and after normalization for indices of bone and body size. Scan J Lab Invest 46:53–57

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nordin BEC, Young MM, Bentley B, Ormondroyd P, Sykes J (1968) Lumbar spine densitometry methodology and results in relation to the menopause. Clin Radiol 19:459–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Krolner B (1982) Osteoporosis and normality: how to express the bone mineral content of lumbar vertebrae. Clin Physiol 2:139–146

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kley HK, Deselaers, Peerenboom H, Kruskempen HL (1980) Enhanced conversion of androstenedione to estrogens in obese males. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 51:1128–1132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE (1985) Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude. Calcif Tissue Int 37:411–417

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dawson-Hughes, B., Shipp, C., Sadowski, L. et al. Bone density of the radius, spine, and hip in relation to percent of ideal body weight in postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 40, 310–314 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556691

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556691

Key words

Navigation