Skip to main content
Log in

Reference test errors bias the evaluation of diagnostic tests for ischemic heart disease

  • Perspectives
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Goroll AH, May LA, Mulley AG. Primary care medicine. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1981;6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Committee for evaluating medical technologies in clinical use of the Institute of Medicine. Assessing medical technologies. Washington. DC: National Academy Press, 1985;82.

  3. Goldman L. Quantitative aspects of clinical reasoning. In: Braunwald E, Isselbacher KJ, Petersdorf RG, Wilson JD, Martin JB, Fauci AS, eds. Harrison’s princples of internal medicine. 11th ed. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company, 1987;7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buck AA, Gart JJ. Comparison of a screening test and a referent test in epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol 1966;83:586–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hui SL, Walter SD. Estimating the error rates of diagnostic tests. Biometrics 1980;36:167–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vacek PM. The effect of conditional dependence on the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Biometrics 1985;41:959–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Thibodeau LA. Evalating diagnostic tests. Biometrics 1981;37:801–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. DeNeef P. Evaluating rapid tests for streptococcal pharyngitis: the apparent accuracy of a diagnostic test when there are errors in the standard of comparison. Med Decis Making 1987;7:92–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Feinstein AR. Clinical epidemiology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1985;618–22.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Tugwell P. Clinical epidemiology: a basic science for clinical medicine. Boston: Little, Brown, 1985;110.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Wagner EH. Clinical epidemiology—the essentials. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1982;51–5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Griner PF, Mayewski RJ, Mushlin AI, Greenland P. Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Principles and applications. Ann Intern Med 1981;94(part 2):559–600.

    Google Scholar 

  13. White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB, et al. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N Engl J Med 1983;310:819–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arnett EN, Isner JM, Redwood DR, et al. Coronary artery narrowing in coronary heart disease: comparison of cineangiographic and necropsy findings. Ann Intern Med 1979;91:350–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Staiger J, Adler CP, Dieckmann H, Barmeyer J. Postmortem angiographic and pathologic anatomic findings in coronary heart disease: a comparative study using planimetry. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1980;3:139–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Harthorne JW. Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation 1976;53:627–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. DeRouen TA, Murray JA, Owen W. Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms. Circulation 1977;55:324–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Weiner DA, Ryan TJ, McCabe CH, et al. Exercise stress testing. Correlations among history of angina, ST-segment response and prevalence of coronary-artery disease in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS). N Engl J Med 1979;301:230–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hlatky MA, Pryor DB, Harrell FE, Califf RM, Mark DB, Rosati RA. Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiography. Multivariate analysis. Am J Med 1984;77:64–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Melin JA, Piret LJ, Vanbutsele RJM, et al. Diagnostic value of exercise electrocardiography and thallium scintigraphy in patients without previous myocardial infarction: a Bayesian approach. Circulation 1981;63:1019–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Detry JMR, Kapita BM, Cosyns J, Sottiaux B, Brasseur LA, Rousseau MF. Diagnostic value of history and maximal exercise electrocardiography in men and women suspected of coronary heart disease. Circulation 1977;56:756–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rozanski A, Diamond GA, Berman DS, Forrester JS, Morris D, Swan HJC. The declining specificity of exercise radionuclide ventriculography. N Engl J Med 1983;309:518–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rozanski A, Diamond GA, Forrester JS, Berman DS, Morris D. Alternative referent standards for cardiac normality. Implications for diagnostic testing. Ann Intern Med 1984;101:164–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ransohoff DF, Feinstein AR. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med 1978;299:926–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Epstein SE, Kent KM, Goldstein RE, Borer JS, Douglas DR. Strategy for evaluation and surgical treatment of the asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patient with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1979;43:1015–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from the Department of Medicine and Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado.

Dr. Boyko is a recipient of a career development award from the National Foundation for Ileitis and Colitis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyko, E.J., Alderman, B.W. & Baron, A.E. Reference test errors bias the evaluation of diagnostic tests for ischemic heart disease. J Gen Intern Med 3, 476–481 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02595925

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02595925

Keywords

Navigation