Abstract
This study seeks to explore the antecedents of perceptions of neighborhood problems (PNP). The primary goal of this analysis is to explicate the relationship between objective neighborhood properties and PNP. A secondary goal is to examineperson-centered contextual aggregations based on one’s spatial proximity to nearby residential characteristics through the use of a geographic information system. The data used in this analysis consist of a diverse sample of 1,115 adults 65+ in Washington D.C., Montgomery, and Prince George’s Counties in Maryland. The study’s primary contextual indicator, the level of poverty in neighborhoods, acts as the most significant factor shaping PNP. The effects on PNP of neighborhoods with a higher concentration of poverty do not impact residents equally; rather, positive achievement, mainly education and income, appear to buffer PNP. Additionally, these findings suggest that the contextual aggregation of neighborhood properties matters relative to the magnitude, significance, and direction of neighborhood effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aneshensel, C.S., & Sucoff, C.A. (1996). The neighborhood context of adolescent mental health.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 37, 293–310.
Austin, M.D., Furr A., & Spine, M. (2002). The effects of neighborhood conditions on perceptions of safety.Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 417–427.
Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics. (2000). Older americans 2000: Key indicators of well-being. Retrieved June 1, 2003. (http://www.agingstats.gov/chartbook2000/healthstatus.html)
Ferraro, K.F. (1996). Women’s fear of victimization: Shadow of sexual assault?Social Forces, 75(2), 667–690.
Garofalo, J., & Laub, J. (1978). The fear of crime: Broadening our perspective.Victimology: An International Journal, 3, 242–253.
Greene, M.S. (1999). Moving in and moving up, blacks transform a county.The Washington Post, Nov. 22, A1.
Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2003). Medicare: Medicare at a glance. Washington, D.C.
Huie, S.A., Hummer, R.A., & Rogers, R. (2002). Individual and contextual risks of death among race and ethnic groups in the united states.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(3), 359–381.
Iannotta, J.G., & Ross, J.L. (2002).Equality of opportunity and the importance of place: Summary of a workshop. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In L.E. Lynn & M.F.H. McGerary (Eds.), inInner-city poverty in the United States (pp. 111–186). Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
LaGrange, R.L., Ferraro, K.F., & Supancic, M. (1992). Perceived risk and fear of crime: Role of social and physical incivilities.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 311–334.
LeClere, F.B., Rogers, R.G., & Peters, K.D. (1997). Ethnicity and mortality in the United States: Inidvidual and community correlates.Social Forces, 76(1), 169–198.
LeClere, F.B., Rogers, R.G., & Peters, K.D. (1998). Neighborhood social context and racial differences in women’s heart disease mortality.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 39, 91–107.
Lewis, D.A., & Maxfield, M.G. (1980). Fear in the neigborhoods: An investigation of the impact of crime.Journal of Rearch in Crime and Delinquency, 17, 160–189.
Lewis, D.A., & Salem, G. (1986).Fear of crime: Incivility and the production of a social problem. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Liem, R., & Liem, J. (1978). Social class and mental illness recondsidered: The role of economic stress and social support.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 139–156.
McLeod, J.D., & Nonnemaker, J.M. (1999). Social stratification and inequality. In C.S. Aneshensel & J.C. Phelan (Eds.),Handbook of the sociology of mental health (pp. 321–344). New York, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Pearlin, L.I. (1989). The sociological study of stress.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 30, 241–56.
Pearlin, L.I., & Skaff, M.M. (1996). Stress and the life course: A paradigmatic alliance.The Gerontologist, 36, 239–247.
Robert, S.A. (1998). Community-level socioeconomic status effects on adult health.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 39, 18–37.
Rohe, W.M., & Burby, R.J. (1988). Fear of crime in public housing.Environment and Behavior, 20, 700–720.
Ross, C.E. (2000). Neighborhood disadvantage and adult depression.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 177–87.
Ross, C.E., & Mirowsky, J. (1999). Disorder and decay: The concept and measurement of perceived neighborhood disorder.Urban Affairs Review, 34, 412–432.
Ross, C.E., & Mirowsky, J. (2001). Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and health.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42, 258–276.
Ross, C.E., Reynolds, J.R., & Geis, K.J. (2000). The contingent meaning of neighborhood stability for residents’ psychological well-being.American Sociological Review, 65, 581–597.
Sampson, R.J., Morenoff, J.D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing neighborhood effects: Social processes and new directions in research.Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478.
Topa, G. (2002). Social interactions, local spillovers and unemployment.Review of Economic Studies, 68, 261–295.
U.S. Census Bureau, Sample File 1 Data. (2000). P12A/P12B, Washington DC, PG and Montgomery counties MD, sex by age (white alone) and (black alone). Retrieved, January 10, 2003. (http://factfinder.Census.gov/servlet/DTTable).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
His current research interests include: neighborhood effects, spatial methods using a GIS, and health disparities in cancer mortality. Currently, Dr. Meersman is a scientist, Social Determinants Surveillance Research (contractor) at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) working on issues related to health disparities, access to mammography screening, and spatial methodologies.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meersman, S.C. Objective neighborhood properties and perceptions of neighborhood problems: Using a geographic information system (GIS) in neighborhood effects and aging research. Ageing International 30, 63–87 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02681007
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02681007