Skip to main content
Log in

Morbidity associated with patient positioning in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of distal ureteral calculi

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 115 patients with 123 distal ureteral stones located below the lower border of the sacroiliac joint, in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was performed with a Siemens Lithostar Lithotriptor. Our initial experience with the prone position in 8 out of 49 cases did not reveal stone fragmentation and on the final treatment sessions shock waves were allowed to enter via the obturator or sciatic foramen whilst the patients were in the supine position, in order to compare the results of treatments performed in both positions. The mean number of treatment sessions per patient, mean number of shock waves per treatment sessions, mean shock voltage per session and mean fluoroscopy time per session were significantly lower in the supine group than in the prone group (p<0.05 for all variables). ESWL of the distal ureteral stones in the prone position seems to have an associated patient morbidity when we compare the results of treatments performed in both positions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huffman, J. L., Bagley, D. H., Lyon, E. S.: Treatment of distal ureteral calculi using rigid ureteroscope.Urology, 20, 574 (1982).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lingeman, J. E., Sonda, P. L., Kahnoski, R. J., Coury, T. A., Newman, D. M., Mosbaugh, P. G., Mertz, J. H. O., Steck, R. E., Frank, B.: Ureteral stone management: Emerging concepts.J. Urol., 135, 1172 (1986).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Saunders, D. B., Trapp, G. R.: Basic and Clinical Biostatistics. Appleton and Lange, Norwalk, Connecticut 1990, p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  4. McCullough, D. L., Yeaman, L. D., Bo, W. J., Assimos, D. G., Kroovand, R. I., Griffin, A. S., Furr, E. G.: Do extracorporeal shock waves affect fertility and fetal development? A study of shock wave effects on the rat ovary and fetus.J. Urol. (Abstract),139, 325 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jenkins, A. D., Gillenwater, J. Y.: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the prone position: Treatment of stones in the distal ureter or anomalous kidney.J. Urol., 139, 911 (1988).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. El-Faqih, S. R., Husain, I., Ekman, P. E., Sharma, N. D., Chakrabarty, A., Talic, R.: Primary choice of intervention for distal ureteric stone: Ureteroscopy or ESWL?Br. J. Urol., 62, 13 (1988).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Becht, E., Moll, V., Neisius, D., Ziegler, M.: Treatment of prevesical ureteral calculi by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.J. Urol., 139, 916 (1988).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mueller, S. C., Wilbert, D., Thueroff, J. W., Alken, P.: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones: Clinical experience and experimental findings.J. Urol., 135, 831 (1986).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chaussy, Ch. (ed.): Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy. New Aspects in the Treatment of Kidney Stone Disease. Karger, Basel 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guntekin, E., Kukul, E., Kayacan, Z. et al. Morbidity associated with patient positioning in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of distal ureteral calculi. International Urology and Nephrology 26, 13–16 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768238

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768238

Keywords

Navigation