Skip to main content
Log in

Midline omphalovesical anomalies in children: Contribution of ultrasound imaging

  • Published:
Urologic radiology

Abstract

Based on reports of 9 surgically proven cases, the authors stress the contribution of high-resolution sonography in the work-up of omphalovesical midline anomalies in children. Sonography (US) proved useful, especially in disorders of urachal patency (cystic mass and sinus type of the malformation).

In the cystic-type mass (3 cases), a midabdominal echogenic cystic mass was demonstrated. The echogenic content resulted from infectious complication. In the sinus type, an echogenic, thickened, tubular omphalovesical tract (8–15 mm) was visualized. This tubular configuration results from the normal omphalovesical anatomy, as can be demonstrated by high-resolution US. With infection, the fascia surrounding the urachal remnants seems to limit the infection.

Differential diagnosis should include vesical duplications anomalies, dystrophic calcifications of the umbilical arteries remnants, and, in case of a solid mass, urachal carcinoma. Ultrasound should be part of the work-up of any suspected urachal or other midline anomaly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ney C, Friedenberg RM: Radiographic findings in anomalies of the urachus.J. Urol 99:288–291, 1968

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sanders RC, Oh KS, Dorst JP: B scan US: positive and negative contrast material evaluation of congenital urachal anatomy.Am J Roentgenol 120:448–452, 1974

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Valla JS, Mollard P: Pathologie de l’ouraque chez l’enfant.Chir Pediatr 22:17–23, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Newman BM, Karp MP, Jewett TC, Cooney DR: Advances in the management of infected urachal cysts.J Pediatr Surg 21:1051–1054, 1986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Williams BD, Fisk JD: Sonographic diagnosis of giant urachal cyst in the adult.AJR 136:417–418, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Retik AB, Bauer SB: Bladder and urachus. In Kelalis PP, King LR, Belman AB (eds):Clinical Pediatric Urology, Second edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1985, pp 743–751

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thomas AJ, Pollack MS, Libshitz HI: Urachal carcinoma: evaluation with CT.Urol Radiol 8:194–198, 1986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sarno RC, Klauber G, Carter BL: CT of urachal anomalies.J Comput Assist Tomogr 7:674–676, 1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Currarino G, Weinberg A: Dystrophic calcifications in obliterated umbilical artery.Pediatr Radiol 15:346–347, 1985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell J, Beasley S, Mac Mullin N, Hutson JM: Congenital prepubic sinus: possible variant of dorsal urethral duplication (Stephens types).J Urol 137:505–506, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fred Avni, E., Matos, C., Diard, F. et al. Midline omphalovesical anomalies in children: Contribution of ultrasound imaging. Urol Radiol 10, 189–194 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02926567

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02926567

Key words

Navigation