Abstract
To determine the availability and limitations of the detection of ischemic lesions by stress thallium-201 myocardial SPECT as the daily routine procedure, we compared and evaluated the detectability of the quantitative analysis (%uptake and washout rate (WR)) and visual evaluation in 104 patients with effort angina and 17 normal subjects.
Visual evaluation combined with WR analysis resulted in significantly higher sensitivity (88.0%) but lower specificity (60.2%) than the other methods. The sensitivity by visual evaluation was quite low in multivessel disease (MVD), and in the regions supplied by mild coronary stenosis or by the left circumflex artery. These were markedly improved by combining visual evaluation and WR analysis, but sensitivity in the MVD group was unsatisfactory even with this analytic method in comparison with the single vessel disease group. One of the causes of low sensitivity in the MVD group might be the “true negative”: No induction of the ischemia in the regions of milder stenosis, or the regions supplied by the collateral coronary flow.
We therefore conclude that the combination of visual evaluation as a qualitative analysis and WR analysis as a quantitative analysis, is the most useful daily routine procedure as a screening test for detecting ischemia.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pohost GM, Zir LM, Moore RH, et al: Differentiation of transiently ischemic from infarcted myocardium by serial imaging after a single dose of thallium- 201.Circulation 55: 294–301, 1977
Maddahi J, Garcia EV, Berman DS, et al: Improved noninvasive assessment of coronary artery disease by quantitative analysis of regional stress myocardial distribution and washout of thallium-201.Circulation 64: 924–935, 1981
Gewirtz H, Palodino W, Sulliran M, et al: Value and limitation of myocardial thallium washout rate in the noninvasive diagnosis of patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease.Am Heart J 106: 681–686, 1983
Burow RD, Pond M, Schafter AW, et al: “Circumferential profiles”; A new method for computer analysis of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging.J Nucl Med 20: 771–777, 1979
Garcia EV, Van Train K, Maddahi J, et al: Quantification of rotational thallium-201 myocardial tomography.J Nucl Med 26: 17–26, 1985
Matsuda H, Murata H, Toyama H, et al: Development of a new quantitative analysis for thallium myocardial SPECT images; Quantitative STEREOVIEW method and evaluation of its clinical usefulness.Jpn J Nucl Med 26: 845–854, 1989
Maeda H, Lee JD, Misawa T, et al: Bull’s-eye analyses in polar coordinate.Jpn J Nucl Med 25: 759–765, 1988
Klein JL, Garcia EV, DePuey EG, et al: Reversibility Bull’s-eye map to quantify reversibility of stressinduced SPECT thallium-201 myocardial perfusion defects.J Nucl Med 31: 1240–1246, 1990
Rigo P, Bailey IK, Griffith LSC, et al: Stress thallium- 201 myocardial scintigraphy for the detection of individual coronary arterial lesions in patients with and without previous myocardial infarction.Am J Cardiol 48: 209–216, 1981
Tamaki N, Yonekura Y, Murai T, et al: Stress thallium-201 transaxial emission computed tomography; Quantitative versus qualitative analysis for evaluation of coronary artery disease.J Am Coll Cardiol 4: 1213–1221, 1984
Narita M, Kurihara T, Murano K, et al: Quantitative analysis of exercise stress thallium-201 myocardial tomography; The evaluation of Bull’s eye map representation for the detection of coronary artery disease.Jpn J Nucl Med 24: 55–64, 1987
Kojima Y, Murata H, Nishimura S: Comparative evaluation of some analysis of stress-redistribution thallium-201 myocardial SPECT for myocardial is- chemia.Jpn J Nucl Med 24: 1511–1520, 1987
Kaul S, Chester DA, Pohost GM, et al: Influence of peak exercise heart rate on normal thallium-201 myocardial clearance.J Nucl Med 27: 26–30, 1986
Narita M, Kurihara T, Murano K, et al: Factors affecting myocardial thallium-201 washout rate after exercise stress and their significance for the detection of coronary artery disease.Jpn J Nucl Med 25: 141–150, 1988
Nakajima K, Muramori A, Taki J, et al: Evaluation of ischemic heart disease by thallium-201 washoutrate map using SPECT.Jpn J Nucl Med 26: 617–623, 1989
Okuzumi I: Assessment of relative washout rate(rW- R) in stress Tl-201 myocardial SPECT.Jpn J Nucl Med 26: 329–338, 1989
AHA Committee Report: A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease.Circulation 51: News from the American Heart Association, 1975
Camici P, Araujo LI, Spinks T, et al: Increased up- take of18F-fiuorodeoxyglucose in postischemic myocardium of patients with exercise-induced angina.Circulation 74: 81–88, 1986
Rigo P, Becker LC, Griffith LSC, et al: Influence of coronary collateral vessels on the results of thallium- 201 myocardial stress imaging.Am J Cardiol 44: 452–458, 1979
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takao, Y., Murata, H. & Katoh, K. Availability and limitations of thallium-201 myocardial SPECT quantitative analysis: Assessment as daily routine procedure for ischemic heart disease. Ann Nucl Med 5, 11–18 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03164608
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03164608