Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of evaluating renal scars by99mTc-DMSA planar and SPECT renal scans, intravenous urography, and ultrasonography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective study is to compare 3 types of99mTc-DMS A renal scan [(a) planar, (b) x-ray type film static SPECT presentation (SPECT-1) and (c) dynamic three-view display of SPECT slices (SPECT-2)], intravenous urography, and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of renal scars. All these studies were performed in 130 pediatric patients, with urinary tract infection (42 patients), vesicoureteral reflux (37), and unilateral or bilateral small kidney(s) (51). The number of renal scars detected was highest with the99mTc-DMS A renal SPECT-1 scan and next came the99mTc-DMSA renal SPECT-2 studies. There is a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the ability of planar and SPECT-1 to recognize renal defects. However, SPECT-2 may provide the best stereotactic localization and image quality of all the methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Savage JM, Dillon MJ, Shah V, Barratt TM, Williams DI. Renin and blood pressure in children with renal scarring and vesicoureteral reflux.Lancet 2: 411–414, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernstein J, Arant BS Jr. Morphological characteristics of segmental renal scarring in vesicoureteral reflux.J Urol 148: 1712–1714, 1992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berg UB. Long-term followup of renal morphology and function in children with recurrent pyelonephritis.J Urol 148: 1715–1720, 1992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Olbing H, Claesson I, Ebel KD, et al. Renal scars and parenchymal thinning in children with vesicoureteral reflux: a 5-year report of the International Reflux Study in Children (European Branch).J Urol 148: 1653–1656, 1992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Merrick MV, Uttley WS, Wild SR. The detection of pyelonephritic scarring in children by radioisotope imaging.Br J Radiol 53: 544–546, 1980.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shanon A, Feldman W, McDonald P, et al. Evaluation of renal scars by technetium-labeled dimercaptosuccinic acid scan, intravenous urography, and ultrasonography: A comparative study.J Pediatr 120: 399–403, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rushton HG, Majd M, Jantausch B, Wiedermann BL, Belman AB. Renal scarring following reflux and nonreflux pyelonephritis in children: evaluation with99mtechnetium-dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphy.J Urol 147: 1327–1332, 1992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Arant BS Jr. Medical management of mild and moderate vesicoureteral reflux: followup studies of infants and young children. A preliminary report of the Southwest Pediatric Nephrology Study Group.J Urol 148: 1683–1687, 1992.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kangarloo H, Gold RH, Fine RN, Diament MJ, Boechat MI. Urinary tract infections in infants and children evaluated by ultrasound.Radiology 154: 367–373, 1985.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dillon MJ, Gordon I, Shah V.99mTc-DMSA scarring and segmental renal vein renin estimates in children with renal scarring.Contrib Nephrol 39: 20–27, 1984.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Verber IG, Studley MR, Meller ST.99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid scan as the first investigation of urinary tract infections.Arch Dis Child 63: 1320–1325, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Smellie JM, Shaw PJ, Prescod NP, Bantock HM. 99mTc dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scan in patients with established radiological renal scarring.Arch Dis Child 63: 1315–1319, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Whitear P, Shaw P, Gordon I. Comparison of 99mTc dimercaptosuccinic acid scans and intravenous urography in children.Br J Radiol 63: 438–443, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ozen HA, Basar I, Erbas B, et al. DMSA renal scanning versus urography for detecting renal scars in vesicoureteral reflux.Eur Urol 17: 47–50, 1990.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Melis K, Vandevivere J, Hoskens C, Vervaet A, Sand A, van Acker KJ. Involvement of the renal parenchyma in acute urinary tract infection: the contribution of 99mTc dimercaptosuccinic acid scan.Eur J Pediatr 151: 536–539, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenberg AR, Rossleigh MA, Brydon MP, Bass SJ, Leighton DM, Farnsworth RH. Evaluation of acute urinary tract infection in children by dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphy: a prospective study.J Urol 148: 1746–1749, 1992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams ED. Renal single photon emission tomography: should we do it?Semin Nucl Med 22: 112–121, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mouratidis B, Ash JM, Gilday DL. Comparison of planar and SPECT99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy for the detection of renal cortical defects in children.Nucl Med Commun 14: 82–86, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Elison BS, Taylor D, van der Wall H, et al. Comparison of DMSA scintigraphy with intravenous urography for the detection of renal scarring and its correlation with vesicoureteral reflux.Br J Urol 69: 294–302, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Monsour M, Azmy AF, MacKenzy R. Renal scarring secondary to vesicoureteric reflux: critical assessment and new grading.Br J Urol 60: 320–324, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dwoskin JY, Perlmutter AD. Vesicoureteral reflux in children: a computerized review.J Urol 109: 888–890, 1973.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Smellie J, Edwards D, Hunter N. Vesicoureteral reflux and renal scarring.Kidney Int 8: S65–72, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Alon U, Pery M, Davidi G, Berant M. Ultrasonography in radiologic evaluation of children with urinary tract infection.Pediatrics 78: 58–64, 1986.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson CE, DeBaz BP, Shurin PA, DeBartolomeo R. Renal ultrasound evaluation of urinary tract infections in children.Pediatrics 78: 871–878, 1986.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Maneval DC, D’Argenio DZ, Wolf W. A kinetic model for99mTc-DMSA in the rat.Eur J Nucl Med 16: 29–34, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Taylor A, Lallone RL, Hagan PL. Optimal handling of dimercaptosuccinic acid for quantitative renal scanning.J Nucl Med 21: 1190–1193, 1980.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Goldraich NP, Alvarenga AR, Goldraich IH, Ramos OL, Sigulem D. Renal accumulation of Tc-99m DMSA in the artificially perfused isolated rat kidney.J Urol 134: 1282–1286, 1985.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Provoost AP, Van Aken M. The effect of DMSA loading on the renal handling of technetium-99m in rats.Uremia Invest 9: 147–150, 1986.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Murase K, Tanada S, Ishine M, Yokoyama M, Hamamoto K. Methods for measuring the renal uptake rate of99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA): a comparative study.J Nucl Med 6: 725–731, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Groshar D, Embon OM, Frenkel A, Front D. Renal function and technetium-99m-dimercaptosuccinic acid uptake in single kidney: the value ofin vivo SPECT quantitation.J Nucl Med 32: 766–768, 1991.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Itoh K, Asano Y, Tsukamoto E, et al. Single photon emission computed tomography with99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid in patients with upper urinary infection and/or vesicoureteral reflux.Ann Nucl Med 5: 29–34, 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yen, T.C., Chen, W.P., Chang, S.L. et al. A comparative study of evaluating renal scars by99mTc-DMSA planar and SPECT renal scans, intravenous urography, and ultrasonography. Ann Nucl Med 8, 147–152 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03165020

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03165020

Key words

Navigation