Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of computer display monitors for computed radiography diagnostic application in a radiology PACS

  • Scientific Note
  • Published:
Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study to compare the performance of the following display monitors for application as PACS CR diagnostic workstations is described. 1. Diagnostic quality, 3 megapixel, 21 inch monochrome LCD monitors. 2. Commercial grade, 2 megapixel, 20 inch colour LCD monitors. Two sets of fifty radiological studies each were presented separately to five radiologists on two occasions, using different displays on each occasion. The two sets of radiological studies were CR of the chest, querying the presence of pneumothorax, and CR of the wrist, querying the presence of a scaphoid fracture. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for diagnostic performance for each presentation. Areas under the ROC curves (AUC) for diagnosis using different monitors were compared for each image set and the following results obtained: Set 1: Monochrome AUC=0.873 +/- 0.026; Colour AUC=0.831 +/-0.032; Set 2: Monochrome AUC=0.945 +/- 0.014; Colour AUC=0.931 +/- 0.019; Differences in AUC were attributed to the different monitors. While not significant at a 95% confidence level, the results have supported a cautious approach to consideration of the use of commercial grade LCD colour monitors for diagnostic application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NEMA,Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Part 14: Grayscale Standard Display Function, PS 3.14, 2003.

  2. Metz, C. E.,Basic Principles of ROC Analysis, Seminars in Nuclear Medicine. 8(4): pp283–298, 1978.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hanley, J. A.,Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Methodology, Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Radiology. 29(3): pp307–335, 1989.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Swaving, M., van Houweingen, H., Ottes, F. P., and Steerneman, T.,Statistical Comparison of ROC Curves from Multiple Readers, Medical Decision Making. 16(2) pp143–152, 1996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Park, S. H., Goo, J. M. and Jo, C.,Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve: Practical Guide for Radiologists, Korean, J Radiol. 5(1): pp11–18, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. ROCIT, http://xray.bsd.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/roc_software.cgi, accessed June 2004.

  7. JROCfit, http://www.rad.jhmi.edu/roc, accessed June 2004.

  8. Hanley, J. A. and McNeil, B. J.,A Method of Comparing the Areas Under receiver Operating Characteristic Curves Derived from the Same Cases, Radiology. 148(3): pp839–843, 1983.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Sim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sim, L., Manthey, K., Esdaile, P. et al. Comparison of computer display monitors for computed radiography diagnostic application in a radiology PACS. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 27, 148–150 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178674

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178674

Key words

Navigation