Skip to main content
Log in

Validation and use of performance measures of functioning in a non-disabled older population: MacArthur studies of successful aging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessment of physical functioning in older persons has generally focused on identifying and characterizing subjects at the disabled end of the functional spectrum. This paper examines the validity of objective, standardized performance measures of physical functioning in characterizing the hierarchy of functioning in non-disabled, higher functioning older persons. Data are from 1192 participants aged 70–79 years in The MacArthur Research Network on Successful Aging Field Study. Participants were drawn from three communitybased populations and represented the upper tertile of functioning, based on cognitive and physical screening assessments. The cohort showed a great deal of heterogeneity on most of the performance measures of functioning that were used. Several analyses provided evidence that this variability was not random and that the performance measures were valid measures of functioning in this cohort: 1) individual performance measures showed a moderate degree of correlation with each other; 2) a summary measure of performance showed an association with chronic diseases and other factors known to be associated with health status; and 3) a larger group than expected by chance alone was found to be functioning at the very highest level. (Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 6: 410-419, 1994)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rowe J.W., Kahn R.L.: Human aging: usual and successful. Science 237: 143–149, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Butler R.N., Gleason H.P.: Productive aging: enhancing vitality in later life. Springer, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Curb J.D., Guralnik J.M., LaCroix A.Z., Korper S.P., Deeg D., Miles T., White L.: Effective aging: meeting the challenge of growing older. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 38: 827–828, 1990.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pinsky J.L., Leaverton P.E., Stokes J.: Predictors of good function: the Framingham Study. J. Chron. Dis. 40 (Suppl. 1): 159S–167S, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Guralnik J.M., Kaplan G.A.: Predictors of healthy aging: Prospective evidence from the Alameda County Study. Am. J. Publ. Health 79: 703–708, 1989.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Harris T., Kovar M.G., Suzman R., Kleinman J.C, Feldman J.J.: Longitudinal study of physical ability in the oldest-old. Am. J. Publ. Health 79: 698–702, 1989.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mor V., Murphy J., Masterson-Allen S., Willey C., Razmpour A., Jackson M.E., Greer D., Kats S.: Risk of functional decline among well elders. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 42: 895–904, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Roos N., Havens B.: Predictors of successful aging: a twelve-year study of Manitoba elderly. Am. J. Publ. Health 81: 63–68, 1991.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wiener J.M., Hanley R.J., Clark R., Van Nostrand J.F.: Measuring the activities of daily living: comparisons across national surveys. J. Gerontol. 45: S229–S237, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cornoni-Huntley J., Brock D.B., Ostfeld A. Taylor J.O., Wallance R.B., Lafferty M.E.: Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly, Resource data book. National Institutes of Health, NIH Pub. No. 86-2443, 1986.

  11. Guralnik J.M., Branch J.G., Curnmings S.R., Curb J.D.: Physical performance measures in aging research. J Gerontol. 44: M141–M146, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Berkman L.F., Seeman T.E., Albert M., Blazer D., Kahn R., Mohs R., Finch C., Schneider E., Cotman C., McCleam G., Nesselroade J., Featherman D., Garmezy N., McKhann G., Brim G., Prager D., Rowe J.: High, usual and impaired functioning in community-dwelling older men and women: findings from the MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Successful Aging. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 46: 1129–1140, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cornoni-Huntley J., Blazer D.G., Lafferty M.E., Everett D.F., Brock D.B., Farmer M.E.: Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly: Volume II. Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, NIH Pub. No. 90-495, Washington, 1990.

  14. Pfeiffer E.: A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 23: 433–441, 1975.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kats S., Downs T.D., Cash H.R., Grotz R.C.: Progress in the development of an index of ADL. Gerontologist 10: 20–30, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nagi S.Z.: An epidemiology of disability among adults in the United States. Milbank Mem. Fund Q. 6: 493–508, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosow I., Breslau N.: A Guttman health scale for the aged. J. Gerontol. 21: 556–559, 1966.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Williams M.E., Hadler N.M., Earp J.A.: Manual ability as a marker of dependency in geriatric women. J. Chron. Dis. 35: 115–122, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Csuka M.E., McCarty D.: Simple method for measurement of lower extremity muscle strength. Am. J. Med. 78: 77–81, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tinetti M.E., Spcechley M., Ginter S.: Risk Factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N. Engl. J. Med. 319: 1701–1707, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nevitt M.C., Cummings S.R., Kidd S., Black D.: Risk factors for recurrent nonsyncopal falls. JAMA 261: 2663–2668, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Seeman T.E., Charpentier P.A., Berkman L.F., Tinetti M.E., Guralnik J.M., Albert M., Blazer D., Rowe J.W.: Predicting changes in physical performance in a high functioning elderly cohort: MacArthur Studies of Successful Aging. J. Gerontol. Med. Sci. 49: M97–M108, 1994.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. SAS Institute Inc., SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 6, ed. 4, Volume 2, Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Guralnik J.M., LaCroix A.Z., Abbott R.D., Berkman L.F., Satterfield S., Evans D.A., Wallace R.B.: Maintaining mobility in late life. I. Demographyc characteristics and chronic conditions. Am. J. Epidemiol. 137: 845–857, 1993.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Manton K.G.: A longitudinal study of functional change and mortality in the United States. J. Gerontol. 43: S153–S161, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Branch L.G., Jette A.M.: A prospective study of long-term care institutionalization among the aged. Am. J. Publ. Health 72: 1373–1379, 1982.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Branch L.G., Katz S., Kniepmann K., Papsidero J.A.: A prospective study of functional status among community elders. Am. J. Publ. Health 74: 266–268, 1984.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guralnik, J.M., Seeman, T.E., Tinetti, M.E. et al. Validation and use of performance measures of functioning in a non-disabled older population: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Aging Clin Exp Res 6, 410–419 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324272

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324272

En]Keywords

Navigation