Skip to main content
Log in

Postural response in older adults with different levels of functional balance capacity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: Aging is frequently accompanied by a deterioration in postural control, but it is not clear whether the primary contributor is increasing age or a progressive loss of functional balance capacity. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that functional balance capacity contributes more than age to changes in postural response in the elderly. Methods: The study considered 3 groups of healthy young, and functionally-stable and functionally-unstable older adults (N=16 each group). Postural responses, including behavioral response patterns, joint angular displacement, displacement of the center of mass and center of pressure, and ground reaction forces, were induced and examined by submitting standing subjects to unexpected backward displacements in the surface supporting them. Results: Functionally-stable older adults showed similar postural response patterns to those of young adults, whereas functionally-unstable older adults differed from young adults in the control of hip, trunk, shear force, and center of pressure trajectory during balance recovery. Conclusions: These findings support the hypothesis that changes in postural control in the elderly correlate with their functional balance capacity and are not just a matter of age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blaszczyk JW, Lowe DL, Hansen PD. Ranges of postural stability and their changes in the elderly. Gait Posture 1994; 2: 11–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Panzer VP, Bandinelli S, Hallet M. Biomechanical assessment of quiet standing and changes associated with aging. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 151–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lord SR, Ward JA, Williams P. Exercise effect on dynamic stability in older women: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 232–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tinetti ME, Baker D, McAvay G, Claus E, Garrett P, Gottschalk M. A multifactorial intervention to reduce the risk of falling among elderly people living in the community. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 821–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bergland A, Jarnlo GB, Laake K. Predictors of falls in the elderly by location. Aging Clin Exp Res 2003; 15: 43–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Diener HC, Horak FB, Nashner LM. Influence of stimulus parameters on human postural responses. J Neurophysiol 1988; 59: 1888–905.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Horak FB, Nashner LM. Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations. J Neurophysiol 1986; 55: 1369–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nashner LM. Fixed patterns of rapid postural responses among leg muscles during stance. Brain Res 1977; 30: 13–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nashner LM, McCollum G. The organization of human postural movements: a formal basis and experimental synthesis. Behav Brain Sci 1985; 8: 135–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alexander NB, Shepard N, Gu MJ, Scultz A. Postural control in young and elderly adults when stance is perturbed: kinematics. J Gerontol 1992; 47: M79–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gu MJ, Shultz AB, Shepard AB, Alexander NB. Postural control in young and elderly adults when stance is perturbed: dynamics. J Biomech 1996; 29: 319–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Asai M, Watanabe Y, Shimizu K. Effects of vestibular rehabilitation on postural control. Acta Otolaryn (Stockh) 1997; Suppl l528: 116–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Horak FB, Nashner LM, Diener HC. Postural strategies associated with somatosensory and vestibular loss. Exp Brain Res 1990; 82: 167–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sheldon JH. The effect of age on the control of sway. Gerontol Clin 1963; 5: 129–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shumway-Cook A, Gruber W, Baldwin M, Liao S. The effect of multidimensional exercises on balance, mobility, and fall risk in community-dwelling older adults. Phys Ther 1997; 77: 46–57.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tinetti ME, Speechley M, Ginter SF. Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 1701–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Whipple RH, Wolfson LI, Amerman PM. The relationship of knee and ankle weakness to falls in nursing home residents: an isokinetic study. J Am Geriatr Soc 1987; 35: 13–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. K. Hill K, Kerse N, Lentini F, et al. Falls: a comparison of trends in community, hospital and mortality data in older Australians. Aging Clin Exp Res 2002; 14: 18–27.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bumin G, Uyanik M, Aki E, Kayiha H. An investigation of risk factors for falls in elderly people in a Turkish rest home: A pilot study. Aging Clin Exp Res 2002; 14: 192–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health 1992; 83: S7–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: theory and practical applications. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Berg KO, Maki BE, Willimas JI, Holliday PJ, Wood-Dauphinee SL. Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 1073–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sundermier L, Woollacott M, Roncesvalles N, Jensen J. The development of balance control in children. Comparisons of EMG and kinetic variables and chronological and developmental groupings. Exp Brain Res 2001; 136: 340–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hall CD, Woollacott MH, Jensen JL. Age-related changes in rate and magnitude of ankle torque development: implications for balance control. J Gerontol 1999; 54A: M507–13.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Roncesvalles MN, Jensen JL, Woollacott MH. Development of lower extremity kinetics for balance control in infants and young children. J Motor Behav 2001; 33: 180–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jensen JL, Brown LA, Woollacott MH. Compensatory stepping: the biomechanics of a preferred response among older adults. Exp Aging Res 2001; 27: 361–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Runge CF, Shupert FB, Zajac FE. Ankle and hip postural strategies defined by joint torques. Gait Posture 1999; 10: 161–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hall CD, Jensen JL. Age-related differences in lower extremity power following support surface perturbations. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50: 1782–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Baloh RW, Fife TD, Zwerling L, Socotch T, Jacobson K, Beell T. Comparison of static and dynamic posturography in young and older normal people. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994; 42: 405–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang-I Lin Ph.D, PT.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, SI., Woollacott, M.H. & Jensen, J.L. Postural response in older adults with different levels of functional balance capacity. Aging Clin Exp Res 16, 369–374 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324566

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324566

Key Words

Navigation