Abstract
The Kaplan-Meier and the Cox regression methods are the most used statistical techniques for performing “time to event analysis” in epidemiological and clinical research. The Kaplan-Meier analysis allows to build up one or more survival curves describing the occurrence of the outcome of interest over time according to the presence/absence of one or more exposures. The Cox regression method models the relationship between a specific exposure (either a continuous one like age, and systolic blood pressure or a categorical one like diabetes, degree of obesity, etc.) and the occurrence of a given outcome taking into account multiple confounders and/or predictors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stel VS, Zoccali C, Dekker FW, Jager KJ. The randomized controlled trial. Nephron Clin Pract 2009; 113: c337–42.
Bland JM. The logrank test. BMJ 2004; 328: 1073.
Postorino M, Marino C, Tripepi G, Zoccali C; Calabrian Registry of Dialysis and Transplantation. Prognostic value of the New York Heart Association classification in end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007; 22: 1377–82.
Tripepi G, Jager KJ, Dekker FW, Zoccali C. Testing for causality and prognosis: etiological and prognostic models. Kidney Int 2008; 74: 1512–5.
Cox DR. Regression models and time tables. J Roy Statist Soc B 1972; 34: 187–220.
Zoccali C, Mallamaci F, Benedetto FA et al; Creed Investigators. Cardiac natriuretic peptides are related to left ventricular mass and function and predict mortality in dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: 1508–15.
Stel VS, Dekker FW, Tripepi G, Zoccali C, Jager KJ. Survival analysis II: Cox regression. Nephron Clin Pract 2011; 119: c255–60.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
ElHafeez, S.A., Torino, C., D’Arrigo, G. et al. An overview on standard statistical methods for assessing exposure-outcome link in survival analysis (Part II): the Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Cox regression method. Aging Clin Exp Res 24, 203–206 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325249
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325249