Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An application of pain rating scales in geriatric patients

  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the applicability of three different pain rating scales, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Graphic Rating Scale (GRS) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), in geriatric patients. Data collection was performed in a geriatric clinic at a university hospital. A structured interview was conducted with 167 patients (mean age=80.5 years). Patients rated their current experience of pain twice with a 5-minute pause in-between on the VAS, GRS and NRS, and were then asked if they experienced pain, ache or hurt (PAH) or other symptoms. The correlations were high and significant both between the ratings of the VAS, GRS and NRS (r=0.78−0.92; p<0.001) (alternative-forms reliability), and between the test and retesting (r=0.75 − r=0.83; p<0.001) (test-retest reliability). A logistic regression analysis showed that the probability to accomplish a rating on the pain scales decreased with advancing age of the patient, and this was especially marked for the VAS. The probability of agreement between the patients’ ratings of pain and the verbal report of PAH tended to decrease with advancing age; this was especially so for the VAS. Patients who verbally denied PAH but reported pain on the scales rated it significant lower (p<0.001) than those who verbally reported PAH and rated the pain as well. Eighteen percent of patients who denied pain but rated a pain experience verbally expressed suffering or distress. The study suggests that pain rating scales such as the VAS, GRS and NRS can be used to evaluate pain experience in geriatric patients. However, agreement between verbally expressed experience of PAH, and the rated experience of pain tended to decrease with advancing age. This indicates that the pain-evaluating process will be substantially improved by an additional penetration supported by a wide variety of expression of hurt, ache, pain, discomfort and distress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferrell B.A., Ferrell B.R., Osterweil D.: Pain in the nursing home. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 38: 409–414, 1990.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ross M.M., Crook J.: Elderly recipients of home nursing services: pain, disability and functional competence. J. Adv. Nurs. 27: 1117–1126, 1998.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Closs S.J.: Pain in elderly patients: a neglected phenomenon? J. Adv. Nurs. 19: 1072–1081, 1994.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferrell B.A.: Pain management in elderly people. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 39: 64–73, 1991.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jensen M.P.: Validity of self-report and observation measures. In: Jensen T.S., Turner J. A., Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Pain, Progress in Pain Research and Management. IASP Press, Seattle, 1997, pp. 637–661.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jacox A.K.: Assessing pain. Am. J. Nurs. 79: 895–900, 1979.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. AHCPR: Management of cancer pain. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Turk D.C., Melzack R.: The measurement of pain and the assessment of people experiencing pain. In: Turk D.C., Melzack R. (Eds.), Handbook of pain assessment. Guilford Press, New York, 1992, pp. 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Closs S.J.: Pain and elderly patients: a survey of nurses knowledge and experiences. J. Adv. Nurs. 23: 237–242, 1996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McCaffery M.: Nursing management of the patient with pain, ed. 2. Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gaston-Johansson F.: Pain Assessment: With particular reference to pain terms, instrument development and pain description. Dissertation, University of Göteborg, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ferrell B.R., Ferrell B.A.: Pain in elderly persons. In: McGuire D.B., Yarbro C.H., Ferrell B.R. (Eds.), Cancer pain management. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston, 1995, pp. 159–205.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Herr K.A., Mobily P.R.: Comparison of selected pain assessment tools for use with the elderly. Appl. Nurs. Res. 6: 39–46, 1993.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Parmelee P.A.: Assessment of pain in the elderly. In: Lawton M.P., Teresi J. (Eds.), Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics. Springer, New York, 1994, pp. 281–301.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yates P., Dewar A., Fentiman B.: Pain: The views of elderly people living in long-term residential care settings. J. Adv. Nurs. 4: 667–674, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grossman S.A., Sheidler V.R., McGuire D.B., Geer C., San-tor D., Piantadosi S.: A comparison of the Hopkins Pain Rating Instrument with standard visual analogue and verbal descriptor scales in patients with cancer pain. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 7: 196–203, 1992.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Price C.I., Curless R.H., Rodgers H.: Can stroke patients use visual analogue scales? Stroke 30: 1357–1361, 1999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Carlsson A.M.: Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain 16: 87–101, 1983.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Downie W.W., Leatham P.A., Rhind V.M., Wright V., Branco J. A., Anderson J. A.: Studies with pain rating scales. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 37: 378–381, 1978.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kremmer E., Hampton Atkinson J., Ignelzi R.J.: Measurement of pain: Patient preference does not confound pain measurement. Pain 10: 241–248, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Seymour R.A.: The use of pain scales in assessing the efficacy of analgesics in post-operative dental pain. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 23: 441–444, 1982.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahles T.A., Blanchard E.B., Ruckdeschel J.C.: The multidimensional nature of cancer-related pain. Pain 17: 277–288, 1983.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Carpenter J.S., Brockopp D.: Comparison of patients’ ratings and examination of nurses’ responses to pain intensity rating scales. Cancer Nurs. 18: 292–298, 1995.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Paice J.A., Cohen F.L.: Validity of a verbally administered numeric rating scale to measure cancer pain intensity. Cancer Nurs. 20: 88–93, 1997.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. DeLoach L.J., Higgins M.S., Caplan A.B., Stiff J.L.: The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale. Anesth. Analg. 86: 102–106, 1998.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Choiniere M., Melzack R., Girard N., Rondeau J., Paquin M.J.: Comparisons between patients’ and nurses’ assessment of pain and medication efficacy in severe burn injuries. Pain 40: 143–152, 1990.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tesler M.D., Savedra M.C., Holzemer W.L., Wilkie D.J., Ward J.A., Paul S.M.: The word-graphic rating scale as a measure of children’s and adolescents’ pain intensity. Res. Nurs. Health 14: 361–371, 1991.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Choiniere M., Amsel R.: A visual analogue thermometer for measuring pain intensity. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 11: 299–311, 1996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Price D.D., McGrath P.A., Rafii A., Buckingham B.: The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 17: 45–56, 1983.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Heft M.W., Parker S.R.: An experimental basis for revising the graphic rating scale for pain. Pain 19: 153–161, 1984.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chapman C.R., Casey K.L., Dubner R., Foley K.M., Grace-ly R.H., Reading A.E.: Pain measurement: an overview. Pain 1: 1–31, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Huskisson E.C.: Measurement of pain. Lancet 2: 1127–1131, 1974.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jensen M.P., Karoly P., Braver S.: The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain 27: 117–126, 1986.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. McGuire D.B., Yarbro C.H.: The measurement of clinical pain. Nurs. Res. 33: 152–156, 1984.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Scott J., Huskisson E.C.: Graphic representation of pain. Pain 2: 175–184, 1976.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gaston-Johansson F.: Measurement of pain: the psychometric properties of the Pain-O-Meter, a simple, inexpensive pain assessment tool that could change health care practices. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 12: 172–181, 1996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Revill S.I., Robinson J.O., Rosen M., Hogg M.I.: The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia 31: 1191–1198, 1976.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ferraz M.B., Quaresma M.R., Aquino L.R., Atra E., Tugwell P., Goldsmith C.H.: Reliability of pain scales in the assessment of literate and illiterate patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 17: 1022–1024, 1990.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jensen M.P., McFarland C.A.: Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. Pain 55: 195–203, 1993.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Weiner D.K., Peterson B.L., Logue P., Keefe F.J.: Predictors of pain self-report in nursing home residents. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 10: 411–420, 1998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Herr K.A., Mobily P.R.: Complexities of pain assessment in the elderly. Clinical considerations. J. Gerontol. Nurs. 17: 12–19, 1991.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gueldner S.H., Hanner M.B.: Methodological issues related to gerontological nursing research. Nurs. Res. 38: 183–185, 1989.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Williams M.A., Oberst M.T., Bjorklund B.C., Kruse H.A., Coggon S.A.: Response formats in questionnaires used with older adults. In: Midwest Nursing Research Conference, Wichita, Kansas, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Walsh T.D.: Letter to the Editor. Pain 19: 96–98, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Donovan M., Dillon P., McGuire L.: Incidence and characteristics of pain in a sample of medical-surgical inpatients. Pain 30: 69–78, 1987.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geriatric Medicine, Göteborg University, Vasa Hospital, SE 411 33, Göteborg, Sweden

    I. Bergh M.D., A. Odén & B. Steen

  2. Department of Health Sciences, University College of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden

    I. Bergh M.D.

  3. Department of Health Care Pedagogics, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden

    B. Sjöström

Authors
  1. I. Bergh M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Sjöström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Odén
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B. Steen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Bergh M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bergh, I., Sjöström, B., Odén, A. et al. An application of pain rating scales in geriatric patients. Aging Clin Exp Res 12, 380–387 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03339864

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03339864

Key words

Search

Navigation