Skip to main content
Log in

Is the Australian HREC system sustainable?

  • Articles
  • Published:
Monash Bioethics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Australia, Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECs) have a vital role to play—as the primary institutional mechanism for ethical review of research—in protecting research participants, and promoting ethical research. Their ability to act effectively in this role is currently threatened by the limited support they receive and their burgeoning workloads. In this discussion paper, I trace some of the factors contributing to what I describe as a resource crisis in human research ethics. I suggest a review of the working of HRECs to canvas a range of alternatives which might serve to redress this crisis, so as to ensure the continued effectiveness of HRECs in protecting participants and promoting ethical research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Dodds.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dodds, S. Is the Australian HREC system sustainable?. Monash Bioethics Review 21, S43–S48 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351274

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351274

Keywords

Navigation