Skip to main content
Log in

The Ethics of Expectations

Biobanks and the Promise of Personalised Medicine

  • Articles
  • Published:
Monash Bioethics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Expectations play a major role in ‘driving’ biotechnology research and development. However, their ethical significance has been largely overlooked. This article examines the dynamics and ethics of expectations surrounding biotechnologies, focusing on biobanks and the promise of personalised medicines. It explores the personal and social implications of expectations, especially where technologies fail to eventuate. The article identifies the claims and practices that support the expectations pertaining to biotechnologies and some of the factors that work against the fulfilment of predicted innovations. It is argued that the role of expectations in shaping thinking and action needs to be taken seriously by those who are concerned about the ethical implications of biotechnologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, N. 2003. ‘Hope against hype: Accountability in biopasts, presents and futures’. Science Studies 16(2): 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, P. 1999. ‘Uses of expertise: Sources, quotes, and voice in the reporting of genetics in the news’. Public Understanding of Science 8: 285–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, O.; Petersen, A. 2008. ‘UK Biobank: Bioethics as a technology of governance’. In Biobanks: Governance in Comparative Perspective, edited by Gottweis, H.; Petersen, A. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S.M. 2006. ‘Pharmacogenetics, pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine: Are we there yet?’ Hematology 1: 111–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. 2003. Our Inheritance, Our Future: Realising the Potential of Genetics in the NHS. Norwich: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feero, W.G; Guttmacher, A.E; Collins, F.S. 2008. ‘The genome gets personal — almost’. JAMA 299(11): 1351–1352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H.; Petersen, A. 2008. Biobanks: Governance in Comparative Perspective. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedgecoe, A. 2004. The Politics of Personalised Medicine: Pharmacogenetics in the Clinic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzman, N.A; Marteau, T.M. 2000. ‘Will genetics revolutionize medicine?’ New England Journal of Medicine 343(2): 141–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikediobi, O.N. 2009. ‘Personalized medicine: Are we there yet?’ The Pharmacogenomics Journal 9: 85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ & Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. 2009. ‘Recession threatens UK stem cell progress’. BIONEWS 503, 7–14 April. Progress Education Trust: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langreth, R. 2008. ‘Biotech blues’. Forbes Magazine, 12 January 2009 (Available at: http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2009/0112/090.html; accessed 10 April 2009).

  • Law, J. 2006. Big Pharma: How the World’s Biggest Drug Companies Control Illness. London: Constable & Robinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, B.; Petersen, A. 2008. ‘Framing consent: The politics of “engagement” in an Australian biobank project’. In Biobanks: Governance in Comparative Perspective, edited by Gottweis, H.; Petersen, A. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, R.; Cassels, A. 2005. Selling Sickness: How Drug Companies Are Turning us all Into Patients. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pálsson, G. 2008. ‘The rise and fall of a biobank: The case of Iceland’. In Biobanks: Governance in Comparative Perspective, edited by Gottweis, H.; Petersen, A. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A. 2001. ‘Biofantasies: Genetics and medicine in the print news media’. Social Science and Medicine 52: 1255–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A. 2002. ‘Replicating our bodies, losing our selves: News media portrayals of human cloning in the wake of Dolly’. Body & Society 8(4): 71–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A. 2005. ‘Securing our genetic health: Engendering trust in UK Biobank. Sociology of Health and Illness 27(2): 271–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A; Anderson, A; Allan, S. 2005. ‘Science fiction/science fact: Medical genetics in fictional and news stories’. New Genetics and Society 24(3): 337–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A. 2006. ‘The genetic conception of health: Is it as radical as claimed?’ Health 10(4): 481–500.

  • Rout, M. 2009. ‘Doctor hounded by Vioxx drug reps’. The Australian, 15 April, p. 3.

  • Sharp, A. 2009. ‘Drug industry set for lower margins’. The Age (Business Day), 14 April, p. 3.

  • The Royal Society. 2005. Personalised Medicines: Hopes and Realities. London: Royal Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, K. 2009. ‘Biotech: The treatment regime of chronic illness is set to change’. BRW, 19–25 March, p. 23.

  • Wynne, B. 2006. ‘Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science — hitting the notes, but missing the music?’ Community Genetics 9: 211–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petersen, A. The Ethics of Expectations. Monash Bioethics Review 28, 22–33 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351307

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351307

Keywords

Navigation