Skip to main content
Log in

Temporal Discounting of Hypothetical Monetary Rewards by Adolescents, Adults, and Older Adults

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present experiment examined temporal discounting across 3 different age bands: adolescents, adults, and older adults (mean ages 14, 46, and 73 years, respectively). A computerized task was employed in which participants were asked to choose between larger rewards available at a specified time in the future—either £100 or £1,000 (approximately $200 and $2,000, respectively)— or a smaller reward available immediately. The subjective value of the reward decreased with increasing delay for each of the 3 age groups. A hyperbola-like function adequately described the group discounting data. The adolescent group discounted significantly more than the adult group when the larger later reward (LLR) was £100 but not when the LLR was £1,000. The adolescents discounted significantly more than the older adult group when the LLR was either £100 or £1,000. There were no significant differences in discounting between the adult and older adult groups. The results of the present study suggest that the rate of temporal discounting is higher in adolescents than in adults but is stable from middle adulthood to older adulthood. Furthermore, the process of temporal discounting appears to be quantitatively similar across the life span.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BINDER, L. M., DIXON, M. R., & GHEZZI, P. M. (2000). A procedure to teach self-control to children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 233–237.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • CRITCHFIELD, T. S., & KOLLINS, S. H. (2001). Temporal discounting: Basic research and the analysis of socially important behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 101–122.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DIXON, M. R., JACOBS, E. A., & SANDERS, S. (2006). Contextual control of delay discounting by pathological gamblers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 413–422.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DYMOND, S., REHFELDT, R. A., & SCHENK, J. J. (2005). Nonautomated procedures in derived stimulus relations research: A methodological note. The Psychological Record, 55, 461–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEINGOLD, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429–456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GREEN, L., FRY, A. F., & MYERSON, J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A life-span comparison. Psychological Science, 5, 33–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GREEN, L., MYERSON, J., & OSTASZEWSKI, P. (1999). Discounting of delayed rewards across the life span: Age differences in individual discounting functions. Behavioural Processes, 46, 89–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • JOHNSON, W., & BICKEL, W. (2002). Within subjects comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77, 129–146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • KIRBY, K. N., & MARAKOVIC, N. N. (1995). Modelling myopic decisions: Evidence for hyperbolic delay-discounting within subjects and amounts. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAZUR, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 5. The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value (pp. 55–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • MYERSON, J., & GREEN, L. (1995). Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MYERSON, J., GREEN, L., & WARUSAWITHARANA, M. (2001). Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 235–243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • RACHLIN, H. (1989). Judgment, decision, and choice: A cognitive/behavioral synthesis. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • RACHLIN, H., & GREEN, L. (1972). Commitment, choice and self-control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 17, 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RICHARDS, J. B., ZHANG, L., MITCHELL, S. H., & DE WIT, H. (1999). Delay or probability discounting in a model of impulsive behaviour: Effect of alcohol. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 71, 121–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROBERTS, B. W., CASPI, A., & MOFFITT, T. (2001). The kids are alright: Growth and stability in personality development from adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 670–683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louise A. McHugh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Whelan, R., McHugh, L.A. Temporal Discounting of Hypothetical Monetary Rewards by Adolescents, Adults, and Older Adults. Psychol Rec 59, 247–258 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395661

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395661

Navigation