Skip to main content
Log in

Effectiveness of early endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage for postoperative fluid collection

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Postoperative abdominal fluid collections (PAFCs) are a potentially fatal complication of pancreatobiliary surgery. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage has recently been shown to be effective in treating PAFCs of more than 4 weeks old. Little is currently known, however, regarding the EUS-guided drainage of PAFCs of less than 4 weeks. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of the early drainage (< 4 weeks) of PAFCs via EUS guidance.

Methods

The data of patients who had undergone EUS-guided PAFC drainage between July 2008 and January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Data of EUS-guided PAFC drainage were obtained from prospectively collected EUS database of our institute and reviewed of patients’ clinical parameters based on electrical medical record.

Results

A total of 48 patients who had undergone EUS-guided PAFC drainage within 4 weeks of pancreatobiliary surgery were enrolled. The indications of procedure included abdominal pain (n = 27), fever (n = 18), leukocytosis (n = 2), and increased size of PAFC during external tube drainage (n = 1). Technical success was achieved in all cases, and the clinical success rate was 95.8% (46/48). Four patients underwent secondary procedures. The median period from surgery to EUS-guide drainage was 14 days (Interquartile range [IQR] 10–16), and median time to resolution was 23.5 days (IQR 8.5–33.8). Adverse events occurred in two cases that were developed intracystic bleeding and were successfully resolved by arterial coil embolization.

Conclusions

Early EUS-guided drainage is a technically feasible, effective, and safe method in patients who have developing PAFCs within 4 weeks of pancreatobiliary surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PAFC:

Postoperative abdominal fluid collection

EUS:

Endoscopic ultrasound

NCD:

Nasocystic drainage

IQR:

Interquartile range

CT:

Computed tomography

FCSEMS:

Fully covered self-expanding metal stent

DP stent:

Double-pigtail plastic stent

LAMS:

Lumen-apposing metal stent

References

  1. Bang JY, Varadarajulu S (2015) Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage of postoperative abdominal fluid collections: What should we do to improve outcomes? Dig Endosc 27:726–727

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tellez-Avila F, Carmona-Aguilera GJ, Valdovinos-Andraca F, Casasola-Sanchez LE, Gonzalez-Aguirre A, Casanova-Sanchez I, Elizondo-Rivera J, Ramirez-Luna MA (2015) Postoperative abdominal collections drainage: Percutaneous versus guided by endoscopic ultrasound. Dig Endosc 27:762–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vin Y, Sima CS, Getrajdman GI, Brown KT, Covey A, Brennan MF, Allen PJ (2008) Management and outcomes of postpancreatectomy fistula, leak, and abscess: results of 908 patients resected at a single institution between 2000 and 2005. J Am Coll Surg 207:490–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Matthews JB (2011) Prevention, evaluation, and treatment of leaks after pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1327–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Neff R (2001) Pancreatic pseudocysts and fluid collections: percutaneous approaches. Surg Clin North Am 81(399–403):xii

    Google Scholar 

  6. Giovannini M (2018) Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 28:157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Muthusamy VR, Chandrasekhara V, Acosta RD, Bruining DH, Chathadi KV, Eloubeidi MA, Faulx AL, Fonkalsrud L, Gurudu SR, Khashab MA, Kothari S, Lightdale JR, Pasha SF, Saltzman JR, Shaukat A, Wang A, Yang J, Cash BD, DeWitt JM (2016) The role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory pancreatic fluid collections. Gastrointest Endosc 83:481–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Storm AC, Levy MJ, Kaura K, Abu Dayyeh BK, Cleary SP, Kendrick ML, Truty MJ, Vargas EJ, Topazian M, Chandrasekhara V (2020) Acute and early EUS-guided transmural drainage of symptomatic postoperative fluid collections. Gastrointest Endosc 91:1085-1091.e1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mudireddy PR, Sethi A, Siddiqui AA, Adler DG, Nieto J, Khara H, Trindade A, Ho S, Benias PC, Draganov PV, Yang D, Mok S, Confer B, Diehl DL (2018) EUS-guided drainage of postsurgical fluid collections using lumen-apposing metal stents: a multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 87:1256–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tilara A, Gerdes H, Allen P, Jarnagin W, Kingham P, Fong Y, DeMatteo R, D’Angelica M, Schattner M (2014) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage of postoperative pancreatic collections. J Am Coll Surg 218:33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee BU, Song TJ, Lee SS, Park DH, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH (2014) Newly designed, fully covered metal stents for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: a prospective randomized study. Endoscopy 46:1078–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, Tsiotos GG, Vege SS (2013) Classification of acute pancreatitis–2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 62:102–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Caillol F, Godat S, Turrini O, Zemmour C, Bories E, Pesenti C, Ratone JP, Ewald J, Delpero JR, Giovannini M (2019) Fluid collection after partial pancreatectomy: EUS drainage and long-term follow-up. Endosc Ultrasound 8:91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM, Christein JD (2011) EUS-guided therapy for management of peripancreatic fluid collections after distal pancreatectomy in 20 consecutive patients. Gastrointest Endosc 74:418–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Baron TH, Thaggard WG, Morgan DE, Stanley RJ (1996) Endoscopic therapy for organized pancreatic necrosis. Gastroenterology 111:755–764

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dhir V, Maydeo A (2015) EUS-guided pseudocyst drainage: Has the metal proved its mettle? Gastrointest Endosc 82:828–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen YI, Yang J, Friedland S, Holmes I, Law R, Hosmer A, Stevens T, Franco MC, Jang S, Pawa R, Mathur N, Sejpal DV, Inamdar S, Trindade AJ, Nieto J, Berzin TM, Sawhney M, DeSimone ML, DiMaio C, Kumta NA, Gupta S, Yachimski P, Anderloni A, Baron TH, James TW, Jamil LH, Ona MA, Lo SK, Gaddam S, Dollhopf M, Bukhari MA, Moran R, Gutierrez OB, Sanaei O, Fayad L, Ngamruengphong S, Kumbhari V, Singh V, Repici A, Khashab MA (2019) Lumen apposing metal stents are superior to plastic stents in pancreatic walled-off necrosis: a large international multicenter study. Endosc Int Open 7:E347-e354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lang GD, Fritz C, Bhat T, Das KK, Murad FM, Early DS, Edmundowicz SA, Kushnir VM, Mullady DK (2018) EUS-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing metal stents and plastic double-pigtail stents: comparison of efficacy and adverse event rates. Gastrointest Endosc 87:150–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saunders R, Ramesh J, Cicconi S, Evans J, Yip VS, Raraty M, Ghaneh P, Sutton R, Neoptolemos JP, Halloran C (2019) A systematic review and meta-analysis of metal versus plastic stents for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: metal stents are advantageous. Surg Endosc 33:1412–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bang JY, Hawes R, Bartolucci A, Varadarajulu S (2015) Efficacy of metal and plastic stents for transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: a systematic review. Dig Endosc 27:486–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Z, Zhao S, Meng Q, Wang S, Chen Y, Wang F, Li Q, Yao J, Du Y, Jin Z, Bai Y, Li Z, Wang D (2019) Comparison of three different stents for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection: A large retrospective study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 34:791–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mohan BP, Jayaraj M, Asokkumar R, Shakhatreh M, Pahal P, Ponnada S, Navaneethan U, Adler DG (2019) Lumen apposing metal stents in drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis, are they any better than plastic stents? A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published since the revised Atlanta classification of pancreatic fluid collections. Endosc Ultrasound 8:82–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lakhtakia S, Basha J, Talukdar R, Gupta R, Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Kumar BVN, Pal P, Kalpala R, Reddy PM, Pradeep R, Singh JR, Rao GV, Reddy DN (2017) Endoscopic “step-up approach” using a dedicated biflanged metal stent reduces the need for direct necrosectomy in walled-off necrosis (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 85:1243–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rana SS, Sharma V, Sharma R, Gupta R, Bhasin DK (2017) Endoscopic ultrasound guided transmural drainage of walled off pancreatic necrosis using a “step - up” approach: A single centre experience. Pancreatology 17:203–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Varadarajulu S, Christein JD, Wilcox CM (2011) Frequency of complications during EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections in 148 consecutive patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26:1504–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bang JY, Hasan M, Navaneethan U, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S (2017) Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) for pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) drainage: may not be business as usual. Gut 66:2054–2056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Song TJ, Lee SS, Moon JH, Choi HJ, Cho CM, Lee KH, Park SW, Kim SH, Lee SO, Lee YN, Lee JK (2019) Efficacy of a novel lumen-apposing metal stent for the treatment of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 90:507–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study concept and design: SSL; acquisition of data analysis and interpretation of data: HRL, DWO, TJS, DHP, SKL, MHK, KBS, JHL, DWH, SCK, and SSL; drafting of the manuscript: HRL and DWO; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: HRL, DWO, and SSL; statistical analysis: HRL and DWO; supervision: SSL.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang Soo Lee.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Dongwook Oh, Hwaryong Lee, Tae Jun Song, Do Hyun Park, MD, Sung Koo Lee, Myung-Hwan Kim, Ki Byung, Song, Jae Hoon Lee, Dae Wook Hwang, Song Cheol Kim, Seung Soo Lee, and Sang Soo Lee have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Guarantor of the article: Sang Soo Lee, MD, PhD, FASGE

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oh, D., Lee, H., Song, T.J. et al. Effectiveness of early endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage for postoperative fluid collection. Surg Endosc 36, 135–142 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08247-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08247-3

Keywords

Navigation