Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Throat and rectal swabs may have an important role in MRSA screening of critically ill patients

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major problem in intensive care units (ICU). International guidelines recommend screening patients for MRSA on admission, although consensus on sites required for optimum detection has not been reached. Our aim was to determine whether throat and rectal swabs identified a significant number of additional MRSA-colonised patients not captured by swabbing at keratinized skin carriage sites (anterior nares, perineum and axillae).

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Setting

30-Bed medical and surgical ICU in a tertiary teaching hospital.

Patients

One thousand four hundred and eighty adult patients consecutively admitted over 15 months.

Measurements and results

Swabs from carriage sites (anterior nares, perineum, axillae, throat and rectum), wounds and clinical samples taken within 48 h of ICU admission were analysed to identify patients admitted with MRSA. A complete set of carriage swabs were received from 1,470 patients. 105 (7%) patients were admitted with MRSA of which 63 (60%) were detected by a pooled keratinized skin swab (anterior nares, perineum, axillae). A further 36 (34%) patients were detected only by throat or rectal swabs. Indeed, throat and rectal swabs combined had a higher sensitivity than pooled keratinised skin swabs (76 vs. 60% P = 0.0247). Swabs from all carriage sites together detected 95% (100) of MRSA positive patients, with five patients being positive at wound sites only.

Conclusions

The throat and rectum are important and potentially hidden sites of MRSA carriage in critically ill patients. These findings prompt the need for larger studies to determine the most cost-effective screening strategy for MRSA detection.

Descriptor

Non-pulmonary nosocomial infections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Clancy M, Graepler A, Wilson M, Douglas I, Johnson J, Price CS (2006) Active screening in high-risk units is an effective and cost-avoidant method to reduce the rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in the hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 27:1009–1017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel JD, Rhinehart E, Jackson M, Chiarello L (2006) Management of multidrug-resistant organisms in healthcare settings. The Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/pdf/ar/mdroGuideline2006.pdf

  3. Huang SS, Yokoe DS, Hinrichsen VL, Spurchise LS, Datta R, Miroshnik I, Platt R (2006) Impact of routine intensive care unit surveillance cultures and resultant barrier precautions on hospital-wide methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 43:971–978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Muto CA, Jernigan JA, Ostrowsky BE, Richet HM, Jarvis WR, Boyce JM, Farr BM (2003) SHEA guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 24:362–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Meurman O, Routamaa M, Peltonen R (2005) Screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: which anatomical sites to culture? J Hosp Infect 61:351–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyce JM, Havill NL, Maria B (2005) Frequency and possible infection control implications of gastrointestinal colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 43:5992–5995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Klotz M, Zimmermann S, Opper S, Heeg K, Mutters R (2005) Possible risk for re-colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by faecal transmission. Int J Hyg Environ Health 208:401–405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maraha B, van Halteren J, Verzijl JM, Wintermans RG, Buiting AG (2002) Decolonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus using oral vancomycin and topical mupirocin. Clin Microbiol Infect 8:671–675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Edgeworth JD, Yadegarfar G, Pathak S, Batra R, Cockfield JD, Wyncoll D, Beale R, Lindsay JA (2007) An outbreak in an intensive care unit of a strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 239 associated with an increased rate of vascular access device-related bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 44:493–501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonisation: a strategy for NHS trusts—a summary of best practice. Department of Health, November 2006

  11. Gurran C, Holliday MG, Perry JD, Ford M, Morgan S, Orr KE (2002) A novel selective medium for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus result reporting in under 24 h. J Hosp Infect 52:148–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kelly S, Hardwick R, Wong J, Rao GG (2004) Laboratory evaluation of selective mannitol broth for MRSA screening. J Hosp Infect 58:239–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jeyaratnam D, Gottlieb A, Ajoku U, French GL (2008) Validation of the IDI-MRSATM system for use on pooled nose, axilla, and groin swabs and single swabs from other screening sites. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2008 Jan 15 (Epub ahead of print)

  14. Marshall C, Wesselingh S, McDonald M, Spelman D (2004) Control of endemic MRSA—what is the evidence? a personal view. J Hosp Infect 56:253–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wertheim HF, Melles DC, Vos MC, van Leeuwen W, van Belkum A, Verbrugh HA, Nouwen JL (2005) The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infect Dis 5:751–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Boyce JM, Havill NL, Otter JA, Adams NM (2007) Widespread environmental contamination associated with patients with diarrhea and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization of the gastrointestinal tract. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 28:1142–1147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Harbarth S, Schrenzel J, Renzi G, Akakpo C, Ricou B (2007) Is throat screening necessary to detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in patients upon admission to an intensive care unit? J Clin Microbiol 45:1072–1073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Coia JE, Duckworth GJ, Edwards DI, Farrington M, Fry C, Humphreys H, Mallaghan C, Tucker DR; Joint Working Party of the British Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy; Hospital Infection Society; Infection Control Nurses Association (2006) Guidelines for the control and prevention of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in healthcare facilities. J Hosp Infect 63:S1–44

    Google Scholar 

  19. de la Cal MA, Cerdá E, van Saene HK, García-Hierro P, Negro E, Parra ML, Arias S, Ballesteros D. (2004) Effectiveness and safety of enteral vancomycin to control endemicity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a medical/surgical intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect 56:175–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Viviani M, van Saene HK, Dezzoni R, Silvestri L, Di Lenarda R, Berlot G, Gullo A. (2005) Control of imported and acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in mechanically ventilated patients: a dose–response study of enteral vancomycin to reduce absolute carriage and infection. Anaesth Intensive Care 33:361–672

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Martin Gulliford for his invaluable assistance with the statistical analysis of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Infection, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ National Health Service Foundation Trust, Lambeth Palace Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK

    Rahul Batra, Alice C. Eziefula & Jonathan Edgeworth

  2. Intensive Care Unit, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ National Health Service Foundation Trust, Lambeth Palace Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK

    Duncan Wyncoll

Authors
  1. Rahul Batra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alice C. Eziefula
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Duncan Wyncoll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jonathan Edgeworth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahul Batra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Batra, R., Eziefula, A.C., Wyncoll, D. et al. Throat and rectal swabs may have an important role in MRSA screening of critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 34, 1703–1706 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1153-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1153-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation