Skip to main content
Log in

Informal home care and labor-force participation of household members

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Germany, informal home care is preferred to professional care services in the public discussion as well as in legal care regulations. However, only minor importance is ascribed to the opportunity costs caregivers face. Therefore, this article explores the influence home care has on the labor supply of caregivers who cohabitate with the care recipient. I use data from the German Socio-Economic Panel from 2001 to 2007, which allows researchers to merge the characteristics of both groups for the first time. Owing to diverging gender roles, I examine female and male caregivers separately. The results show that having an individual in need of care in the household does not decrease labor supply to an economically relevant quantity. As providing care might be endogenous to the labor-supply decision, I test for endogeneity by using characteristics of care recipients as instruments and I additionally test for sample attrition. Moreover, the panel structure allows me to control for unobserved heterogeneity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arber S, Ginn J (1995) Gender differences in the relationship between paid employment and informal care. Work Employ Soc 9(3): 445–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaz RF (1996) Full-time employment and informal caregiving in the 1980s. Med Care 34(6): 524–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolin K, Lindgren B, Lundborg P (2008) Your next of kin or your own career?: caring and working among the 50+ of Europe. J Health Econ 27(3): 718–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody EM, Schoonover CB (1986) Patterns of parent care when adult daughters work and when they do not. The Gerontologist 26(4): 372–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael F, Charles S (1998) The labour market costs of community care. J Health Econ 17(6): 747–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael F, Charles S (2003) Benefit payments, informal care and female labour supply. Appl Econ Lett 10(7): 411–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael F, Charles S (2003) The opportunity costs of informal care: does gender matter?. J Health Econ 22(5): 781–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doty P, Jackson ME, Crown W (1998) The impact of female caregivers’ employment status on patterns of formal and informal eldercare. The Gerontologist 38(3): 331–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer JW, Coward RT (1991) A multivariate comparison of the involvement of adult sons versus daughters in the care of impaired parents. J Gerontology 46(5): S259–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettner SL (1995) The impact of “parent care” on female labor supply decisions. Demography 32(1): 63–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettner SL (1996) The opportunity costs of elder care. J Hum Resour 31(1): 189–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fast JE, Williamson DL, Keating NC (1999) The hidden costs of informal elder care. J Family Econ Issues 20(3): 301–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Law Gazette (ed) (2008) Gesetz zur strukturellen Weiterentwicklung der Pflegeversicherung (Pflege-Weiterentwicklungsgesetz). Federal Law Gazette (BGBl.) Part I No.20). Bundesanzeiger Verlag mbH, Cologne

  • Federal Ministry of Health (ed) (2008) Leistungsansprüche der Versicherten an die Pflegeversicherung, Berlin

  • Federal Ministry of Justice (eds) (2003) German Social Code (SGB). Federal Law Gazette (BGBl.) Part I No.67. Bundesanzeiger Verlag, Cologne

  • Gilberg R (2000) Hilfe-und Pflegebedürftigkeit im höheren Alter: eine Analyse des Bedarfs und der Inanspruchnahme von Hilfsleistungen. Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitmueller A (2007) The chicken or the egg?: Endogeneity in labour market participation of informal carers in England. J Health Econ 26(3): 536–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heitmueller A, Inglis K (2004) Carefree? Participation and pay differentials for informal carers in Britain. IZA discuss paper no. 1273

  • Himes CL, Schneider U, Wolf DA (2001) The dynamics of long-term care service use in Germany. Vierteljahresh Wirtsch 70(1): 153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutschen Wirtschaft (2007) Deutschland in Zahlen 2007. Deutscher Instituts-Verlag GmbH, Köln

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RW, Lo Sasso AT (2000) The trade-off between hours of paid employment and time assistance to elderly parents at midlife. The Urban Institute, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Keese M, Meng A, Schnabel R (2010) Are you well prepared for long-term care? Assessing financial gaps in private German care provision. Ruhr Economic Paper 203

  • Moen P, Robison J, Fields V (1994) Women’s work and caregiving roles: a life course approach. J Gerontology 49(4): S176–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muurinen JM (1986) The economics of informal care: labor market effects in the national hospice study. Med Care 24(11): 1007–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavalko EK, Artis JE (1997) Women’s caregiving and paid work: causal relationships in late midlife. J Gerontology 52B(4): S170–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pezzin LE, Schone BS (1999) Intergenerational household formation, female labor supply and informal caregiving: a bargaining approach. J Hum Resour 34(3): 475–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothgang H (1997) Ziele und Wirkungen der Pflegeversicherung: Eine ökonomische Analyse. Campus-Verlag, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel R (2007) Zukunft der Pflege: Entwicklung der Pflegeversicherung bis 2050. Initiative Neue Soziale Marktwirtschaft, Köln

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneekloth U, Engels D (2006) Selbständigkeit und Hilfebedarf bei älteren Menschen in Privathaushalten: Pflegearrangements, Demenz, Versorgungsangebote. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider T, Drobnic S, Blossfeld HP (2001) Pflegebedürftige Personen im Haushalt und das Erwerbsverhalten verheirateter Frauen. Z Soziol 30: 362–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Schupp J, Künemund H (2004) Private Versorgung und Betreuung von Pflegebedürftigen in Deutschland. DIW-Wochenbericht, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Soldo BJ, Hill MS (1995) Family structure and transfer measures in the health and retirement study: background and overview. J Hum Resour 30: S108–S137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiess CK, Schneider U (2002) Midlife caregiving & employment: an analysis of adjustments in work hours and informal care for female employees in europe. ENEPRI working paper no. 9, February 2002

  • Staiger D, Stock JH (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65(3): 557–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern S (1995) Estimating family long-term care decisions in the presence of endogenous child characteristics. J Hum Resour 30(3): 551–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone RI, Short PF (1990) The competing demands of employment and informal caregiving to disabled elders. Med Care 28(6): 513–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viitanen TK (2005) Informal elderly care and women’s labour force participation across europe. ENEPRI Res Rep No. 13

  • Wagner GG, Frick JR, Schupp J (2007) The German Socio-Economic Panel study (SOEP)—scope, evolution and enhancements. Schmollers Jahrb 127(1): 139–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf DA, Soldo BJ (1994) Married women’s allocation of time to employment and care of elderly parents. J Hum Resour 29(4): 1259–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annika Meng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meng, A. Informal home care and labor-force participation of household members. Empir Econ 44, 959–979 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0537-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0537-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation