Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term changes in bone metabolism, bone mineral density, quantitative ultrasound parameters, and fracture incidence after spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional observational study in 100 paraplegic men

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To study the time course of demineralization and fracture incidence after spinal cord injury (SCI), 100 paraplegic men with complete motor loss were investigated in a cross-sectional study 3 months to 30 years after their traumatic SCI. Fracture history was assessed and verified using patients’ files and X-rays. BMD of the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), distal forearm (ultradistal part = UDR, 1/3 distal part = 1/3R), distal tibial diaphysis (TDIA), and distal tibial epiphysis (TEPI) was measured using DXA. Stiffness of the calcaneus (QUI.CALC), speed of sound of the tibia (SOS.TIB), and amplitude-dependent SOS across the proximal phalanges (adSOS.PHAL) were measured using QUS. Z-Scores of BMD and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) were plotted against time-since-injury and compared among four groups of paraplegics stratified according to time-since-injury (<1 year, stratum I; 1–9 years, stratum II; 10–19 years, stratum III; 20–29 years, stratum IV). Biochemical markers of bone turnover (deoxypyridinoline/creatinine (D-pyr/Cr), osteocalcin, alkaline phosphatase) and the main parameters of calcium phosphate metabolism were measured. Fifteen out of 98 paraplegics had sustained a total of 39 fragility fractures within 1,010 years of observation. All recorded fractures were fractures of the lower limbs, mean time to first fracture being 8.9 ± 1.4 years. Fracture incidence increased with time-after-SCI, from 1% in the first 12 months to 4.6%/year in paraplegics since >20 years (p<.01). The overall fracture incidence was 2.2%/year. Compared with nonfractured paraplegics, those with a fracture history had been injured for a longer time (p<.01). Furthermore, they had lower Z-scores at FN, TEPI, and TDIA (p<.01 to <.0001), the largest difference being observed at TDIA, compared with the nonfractured. At the lower limbs, BMD decreased with time at all sites (r=.49 to .78, all p<.0001). At FN and TEPI, bone loss followed a log curve which leveled off between 1 to 3 years after injury. In contrast, Z-scores of TDIA continuously decreased even beyond 10 years after injury. LS BMD Z-score increased with time-since-SCI (p<.05). Similarly to DXA, QUS allowed differentiation of early and rapid trabecular bone loss (QUI.CALC) vs slow and continuous cortical bone loss (SOS.TIB). Biochemical markers reflected a disproportion between highly elevated bone resorption and almost normal bone formation early after injury. Turnover declined following a log curve with time-after-SCI, however, D-pyr/Cr remained elevated in 30% of paraplegics injured >10 years. In paraplegic men early (trabecular) and persistent (cortical) bone loss occurs at the lower limbs and leads to an increasing fracture incidence with time-after-SCI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nottage WM (1981) A review of long-bone fractures in patients with spinal cord injury. Clin Orthop 155:65–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vestergaard P, Krogh K, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L (1998) Fracture rates and risk factors for fractures in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 36:790–796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Albright F, Burnett CH, Cope O, Parson W (1941) Acute atrophy of bone (osteoporosis) simulating hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1:711–716

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Roberts D, Lee W, Cuneo RC et al (1998) Longitudinal study of bone turnover after acute spinal cord injury. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:415–422

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Biering-Sorensen F, Bohr HH, Schaadt OP (1990) Longitudinal study of bone mineral content in the lumbar spine, the forearm and the lower extremities after spinal cord injury. Eur J Clin Invest 20:330–335

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Garland DE, Stewart CA, Adkins RH et al (1992) Osteoporosis after spinal cord injury. J Orthop Res 10:371–378

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilmet E, Ismail AA, Heilporn A, Welraeds D, Bergmann P (1995) Longitudinal study of the bone mineral content and of soft tissue composition after spinal cord section. Paraplegia 33:674–677

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Frey-Rindova P, de Bruin ED, Stüssi E, Dambacher MA, Dietz V (2000) Bone mineral density in upper and lower extremities during 12 months after spinal cord injury measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Spinal Cord 38:26–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Minaire P, Meunier P, Edouard C, Bernard J, Courpron P, Bourret J (1974) Quantitative histological data on disuse osteoporosis. Calcif Tiss Res 17:57–73

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Biering-Sorensen F, Bohr H, Schaadt O (1988) Bone mineral content of the lumbar spine and lower extremities years after spinal cord lesion. Paraplegia 26:293–301

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Szollar SM, Martin EME, Sartoris DJ, Parthemore JG, Deftos LJ (1998) Bone mineral density and indexes of bone metabolism in spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 77:28–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goemaere S, Van Laere M, De Neve P, Kaufman JM (1994) Bone mineral status in paraplegic patients who do or do not perform standing. Osteoporos Int 4:138–143

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bauman WA, Spungen AM, Wang J, Pierson RN, Schwartz E (1999) Continuous loss of bone during chronic immobilization: a monozygotic twin study. Osteoporos Int 10:123–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dauty M, Verbe BP, Maugars Y, Dubois C, Mathe JF (2000) Supralesional and sublesional bone mineral density in spinal cord injured patients. Bone 27:305–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ragnarsson KT, Sell HG (1981) Lower extremity fractures after spinal cord injury: a retrospective study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 62:418–423

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chow YW, Inman C, Pollintine P et al (1996) Ultrasound bone densitometry and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in patients with spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord 34:736–741

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Casez JP, Troendle A, Lippuner K, Jaeger P (1994) Bone mineral density at distal tibia using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in normal women and in patients with vertebral osteoporosis or primary hyperparathyroidism. J Bone Miner Res 9:1851–1857

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaufman JJ, Einhorn TA (1993) Perspectives: ultrasound assessment of bone. J Bone Miner Res 8:517–525

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Foldes A, Rimon A, Keinan D, Popovtzer M (1995) Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia: a novel approach for assessment of bone status. Bone 17:363–367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Joly J, Westhovens R, Borghs H et al (1999) Reference curve and diagnostic sensitivity for a new ultrasound device for the phalanges, the DBMsonic 1200, in Belgian women. Osteoporos Int 9:284–289

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Eichenholtz SN (1963) Management of long-bone fractures in paraplegic patients. J Bone Joint Surg 45:299–310

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ingram RR, Suman RK, Freeman PA (1989) Lower limb fractures in the chronic spinal cord injured patient. Paraplegia 27:133–139

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Comarr AE, Hutchinson RH, Borse E (1962) Extremity fractures of patients with spinal cord injuries. Am J Surg 103:732–739

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bergmann P, Heilporn A, Schoutens A, Paternot J, Tricot A (1977) Longitudinal study of calcium and bone metabolism in paraplegic patients. Paraplegia 15:147–159

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chantraine A (1971) Clinical investigations of bone metabolism in spinal cord lesions. Paraplegia 8:253–259

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vaziri ND, Pandian MR, Segal JL, Winer RL, Eltorai I, Brunnemann S (1994) Vitamin D, parathormone, and calcitonine profiles in persons with long-standing spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75:766–769

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Frost HM (1987) The mechanostat: a proposed pathogenic mechanism of osteoporosis and the bone mass effect of mechanical and non-mechanical agents. Bone Miner 2:73–85

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Burger EH, Klein-Nuhlend J, Van Stien ME, Veldhuizen JP (1987) Inhibiting effect of mechanical stimulation on bone resorption in vivo. In: Christiansen C, Rijs B (eds) Osteoporosis. Osteopress, Copenhagen, pp 767–770

  29. Demulder A, Guns M, Ismail A, Wilmet E, Fondu P, Bergmann P (1998) Increased osteoclast-like cells formation in long-term bone marrow cultures from patients with a spinal cord injury. Calcif Tissue Int 63:396–400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. D’Souza SM, Mac Intyre I, Girgis SI, Mundy GR (1986) Human synthetic calcitonin gene-related peptide inhibits bone resorption in vitro. Endocrinology 119:58–61

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Philippe Kress for his invaluable contribution to the preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kurt Lippuner.

Additional information

Both authors, Y. Zehnder and M. Lüthi, have equally contributed to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zehnder, Y., Lüthi, M., Michel, D. et al. Long-term changes in bone metabolism, bone mineral density, quantitative ultrasound parameters, and fracture incidence after spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional observational study in 100 paraplegic men. Osteoporos Int 15, 180–189 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1529-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1529-6

Keywords

Navigation