Skip to main content
Log in

Development of sensitivity-improved fluorescence-linked immunosorbent assay using a fluorescent single-domain antibody against the bioactive naphthoquinone, plumbagin

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A fluorescent single-domain antibody (fluobody), a fusion protein of a green fluorescent protein extracted from Aequorea coerulescens (AcGFP), a mutant that has been codon-optimized for mammalian expression, and a single-chain variable fragment antibody (scFv), against plumbagin (5-hydroxy-2-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone; PL) was successfully constructed and expressed in Escherichia coli. The expressed fluobody was purified, refolded, and characterized to develop a speedy, simple, and sensitive fluorescence-linked immunosorbent assay (FLISA) for the determination of PL. In this study, two kinds of fluobody containing PL-scFv at the N-terminus of AcGFP (N fluobody) or the C-terminus of AcGFP (C fluobody) were constructed with flexible amino acid linker (Gly4Ser)2 between PL-scFv and AcGFP for comparative purposes. Characterization of the fluobodies revealed that the C fluobody has better properties as a probe for FLISA than the N fluobody because the fluorescence intensity of C fluobody was 18-fold higher than that of N fluobody. Moreover, C fluobody exhibited a fourfold-higher binding affinity than the N fluobody. More interestingly, the limit of detection for PL measurement in FLISA (24 ng mL−1) was improved to eightfold higher than that in conventional ELISA (0.2 μg mL−1), indicating that a sensitive immunoassay could be developed by using fluobody instead of monoclonal antibody or scFv.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lin LC, Yang LL, Chou CJ (2003) Phytochemistry 62:619–622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Curreli N, Sollai F, Massa L, Comandini O, Rufo A, Sanjust E, Rinaldi A, Rinaldi AC (2001) J Basic Microb 41:253–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Likhitwitayawuid K, Kaewamatawong R, Ruangrungsi N, Krungkrai J (1998) Planta Med 64:237–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Medentsev AG, Akimenko VK (1998) Phytochemistry 47:935–959

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang YC, Huang TL (2005) J Chromatogr A 1094:99–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Itoigawa M, Takeya K, Furukawa H (1991) Planta Med 57:317–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. de Paiva SR, Figueiredo MR, Aragão TV, Kaplan MAC (2003) Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 98:959–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhargava SK (1984) Indian J Exp Biol 22:153–156

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ding Y, Chen ZJ, Liu S, Che D, Vetter M, Chang CH (2005) J Pharm Pharmacol 57:111–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Srinivasan L, Mathew N, Muthuswamy K (2009) Parasitol Res 105:1179–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hsu YL, Cho CY, Kuo PL, Huang YT, Lin CC (2006) J Pharmacol Exp Ther 318:484–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sandur SK, Ichikawa H, Sethi G, Ahn KS, Aggarwal BB (2006) J Biol Chem 281:17023–17033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Babula P, Mikelova R, Adam V, Kizek R, Havel L, Sladky Z (2006) J Chromatogr B 842:28–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsieh YJ, Lin LC, Tsai TH (2005) J Chromatogr A 1083:141–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hermanson GT (1996) Bioconjugate techniques. Academic, San Diego, pp 297–364

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Souriau C, Hudson PJ (2001) Expert Opin Biol Ther 1:845–855

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Casey JL, Coley AM, Tilley LM, Foley M (2000) Protein Eng 13:445–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Peipp M, Saul D, Barbin K, Bruenke J, Zunino SJ, Niederweis M, Fey GH (2004) J Immunol Methods 285:265–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cao M, Cao P, Yan HJ, Ren F, Lu WG, Hu YL, Zhang SQ (2008) Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 79:423–431

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Olichon A, Surrey T (2007) J Biol Chem 282:36314–36320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim IS, Shim JH, Suh YT, Yau KYF, Hall JC, Trevors JT, Lee H (2002) Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 66:1148–1151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Oelschlaeger P, Srikant-Iyer S, Lange S, Schmitt J, Schmid RD (2002) Anal Biochem 309:27–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sakamoto S, Putalun W, Tsuchihashi R, Morimoto S, Kinjo J, Tanaka H (2008) Anal Chim Acta 607:100–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sakamoto S, Taura F, Putalun W, Ponkitwitoon B, Tsuchihashi R, Morimoto S, Kinjo J, Shoyama Y, Tanaka H (2009) Biol Pharm Bull 32:434–439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bradford MM (1976) Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Umetsu M, Tsumoto K, Hara M, Ashish K, Goda S, Adschiri T, Kumagai I (2003) J Biol Chem 278:8979–8987

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Laemmli UK (1970) Nature 227:680–685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J (1979) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:4350–4354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Friguet B, Chaffotte AF, Djavadi-Ohaniance L, Goldberg ME (1985) J Immunol Methods 77:305–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Weiler E, Zenk MH (1976) Phytochemistry 15:1537–1545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Research Fellowship of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists. The research in this paper was also supported, in part, by a Grant in Aid from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Asian CORE Program; the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan; and the National Center for Genetic and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), Thailand

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroyuki Tanaka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sakamoto, S., Taura, F., Pongkitwitoon, B. et al. Development of sensitivity-improved fluorescence-linked immunosorbent assay using a fluorescent single-domain antibody against the bioactive naphthoquinone, plumbagin. Anal Bioanal Chem 396, 2955–2963 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-3535-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-3535-9

Keywords

Navigation