Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Harmonization of clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis and osteopenia in Europe: A difficult challenge

  • Clinical Practice Guidelines For The Prevention And Treatment Of Osteoporosis And Osteopenia
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Europe is a patchwork of various medical cultures and financial resources. Variations abound with respect to financing, accessibility to public health systems, health expenditures, drug registration and reimbursement, the prescription of drugs, and clinical applications, as well as the perception of osteoporosis itself. However, there are possibilities for the harmonization of medical services among the various countries within Europe. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EAEMP) is attending to the centralized or decentralized procedures for the registration of drugs. The Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science (GREES) is investigating guidelines for drug registration as well as gathering and making available medical references. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases (EFFO) is increasing awareness of the prevalence of the disease and the need for prevention and treatment. Finally, the International Federation of Societies on Skeletal Diseases (IFSSD) is coordinating epidemiologic, clinical, and social research.

There is a need for increased awareness of osteoporosis throughout Europe. Health authorities are in need of cost/ benefit reports leading to the registration and reimbursement of agents. Primary care physicians need information about osteoporosis and need to become involved in the diagnosis and science of the disease. Awareness needs to be generated among specialists; they need to be educated in the latest techniques for diagnosis and treatment. Finally, the general population needs to become aware of osteoporosis and to be encouraged to participate in the prevention and treatment of this disease.

Current screening and detection in Europe is being done by densitometry. However, other techniques on the horizon include ultrasound and biochemical markers. Primary prevention, i.e., maximizing peak bone mass, includes examining the genetics of osteoporosis to determine the high-risk population and promoting reasonable physical exercise and dietary/life-style habits (e.g., increased calcium and avoidance of tobacco). Secondary prevention includes the identification of high-risk groups through risk factors, biochemical markers, and densitometry and adherence to the World Health Organization definition of osteopenia-osteoporosis (adapted to financial concerns by GREES guidelines). Other therapies include hormone replacement agents (although there are risks for cancer and concerns about durability), calcium and other inhibitors of bone resorption, physical activity, and vitamin D prophylaxis in the elderly. Treatment of established or severe osteoporosis includes drugs upon availability (inhibitors of bone resorption and stimulators of bone formation), surgery, and experimental approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO Technical Répons Series 843 (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Geneva, Switzerland. ISBN 92-94 120843 0

  2. Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science (GREES) (1995) Recommendations for the registration of new chemical entities used in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. (Editorial) Calcif Tissue Int 57:247–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Slemenda CW, Miller JZ, Reister TK, et al. (1991) Calcium supplementation enhances bone mineral accretion in growing children. J Bone Miner Res 6(suppl 1):137

    Google Scholar 

  4. Reginster JY, Deroisy R, Sarlct N, et al. (1990) Relation between calcium intake during different periods of life and bone mineral content at the menopause. In: Christiansen C. Overguard K (eds) Osteoporosis 1990. Osteoprcss ApS. Copenhagen, Denmark, pp 400–401

    Google Scholar 

  5. Felson DT, Zhang Y, Hannan MT, et al. (1993) The effect of postmenopausal estrogen therapy on bone density in elderly women. N Engl J Med 329:1 141–1 140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chapuy MC, Arlot ME, Duboeuf F, et al. (1992) Vitamin D, and calcium to prevent hip fractures in the elderly women. N Engl J Med 327:1637–1642

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper C, Barker DJ, Wkkham C (1988) Physical activity, muscle strength, and calcium intake in fracture of the proximal femur in Britain. BMJ 297:1443–1446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reginster, J.Y.L. Harmonization of clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis and osteopenia in Europe: A difficult challenge. Calcif Tissue Int 59 (Suppl 1), S24–S29 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002239900172

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002239900172

Keywords

Navigation